Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Workfront vs Wrike comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Adobe Workfront enhances efficiency, collaboration, and productivity, offering ROI through reduced costs, real-time updates, and improved user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.7
Users gained substantial financial savings and efficiency using Wrike, with ROI potentially tenfold and improved team visibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Adobe Workfront customer service is praised for responsiveness and expertise, despite occasional delays or costly advanced support.
Sentiment score
8.6
Wrike support is highly rated for responsiveness and expertise, offering quick resolutions and valuable community resources.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Adobe Workfront scales well for various organizations, managing users and projects smoothly with high performance and adaptable scalability.
Sentiment score
7.4
Wrike is scalable and customizable, though opinions vary on performance; cloud capabilities efficiently manage expansions without disruptions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Adobe Workfront is generally stable, with minimal downtime, quick issue resolutions, and requires modern browsers for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.5
Wrike is generally stable and effective, with minimal issues reported, mostly under specific conditions like variable internet speeds.
 

Room For Improvement

Adobe Workfront needs faster updates, user-friendly design, improved integrations, flexible customization, and better documentation for enhanced usability.
Wrike users desire improvements in reporting, interface, task management, mobile app, customization, collaboration, support, and cost efficiency.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
 

Setup Cost

Adobe Workfront pricing varies by license type, with significant subscription fees but potential discounts for existing Adobe customers.
Enterprise users appreciate Wrike's subscription model for its value and convenience, despite varying costs and perceptions.
 

Valuable Features

Adobe Workfront enhances collaboration and decision-making with customizable templates, workflow management, and strong integration supporting agile and waterfall methodologies.
Wrike users appreciate its intuitive interface, collaboration tools, integration, customization, task management features, and strong support resources.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront
Ranking in Project Management Software
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (1st)
Wrike
Ranking in Project Management Software
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 4.5%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent
Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.
Awadhesh Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously
There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
84%
University
2%
Computer Software Company
1%
Financial Services Firm
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?
I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?
Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...
What needs improvement with Workfront?
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...
What do you like most about Wrike?
The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality.
What needs improvement with Wrike?
There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also d...
What is your primary use case for Wrike?
I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.