Big Switch Networks vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

The compared Big Switch Networks and NETSCOUT solutions aren't in the same category. Big Switch Networks is ranked #9 in SDN , and holds a 3.1% mindshare in the category. NETSCOUT is ranked #23 in NMS , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Big Switch Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Big Switch Networks

Read 1 Big Switch Networks review

285 Views
224 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 47 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

2,705 Views
1,834 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Big Switch Networks

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Big Switch Networks and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aviatrix, Juniper and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN).

To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Networking (SDN) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Big Switch Networks

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Networking (SDN) (9th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (5th)

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Big Switch Networks is designed for Software Defined Networking (SDN) and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, down 5.3% compared to last year.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, on the other hand, focuses on Network Monitoring Software, holds 1.7% mindshare, up 1.5% since last year.

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jason Best

Data center network architect at Cloudwire

Sep 12, 2022

A flexible solution that can be integrated with third-party solutions whilst maintaining its automated nature

I think if I was to say something that could be improved, it would be a multi-data center nature of the implementation. Meaning, having an active-active data center with multiple entrance-exit points. I think that feature could be improved to provide a kind of anycast gateway solution into the functionality that would make it a lot more flexible and versatile. Maybe also making the solution a bit more like the NSX-T from VMware, more on the logical part of the solution, like micro-segmentation and the ability to have a distributed firewall across the whole solution, to implement it in an easier way than they currently do with the security aspect of the solution.

Read full review

Ruslan Melnyk

Business Unit Manager at BAKOTECH

Mar 20, 2024

Useful for network performance monitoring

My manager can explain the use cases attached to the product. I am a unit leader in my company, and I don't sell the product directly to our partners or customers. In my company, I manage certain processes and a team while building, developing, and providing them with a direction for the market. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a good solution for network performance monitoring since it is not cloud-based. My company sells NETSCOUT nGeniusONE in eight to ten countries. I think the solution is not good for capacity planning, but it is better to help find problems in applications because not every infrastructure is good at managing working applications. I think it is a solution meant for applications. The tool is useful for solving problems attached to applications. The tool's real-time network monitoring capability was used when the product was more reactive. In our company, if we use real-time monitoring, then we need to deal with raw traffic. In our company, if we don't see any problem in the real-time systems, we have the possibility to rely on the tool since it acts like a time machine for us, which can allow us to get back to the areas of problem and solve them. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. For many users, it can be a good monitoring system that can be scaled up in the future. I think it is a good product to start with when working systems in an environment. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is another tool used to manage raw traffic, and I find it to integrate well into our customers' network. I am not using it actively on the system. I use the tool for network packet brokers. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I liked about the solution is the quick and easy way you can build a network data center fabric."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The valuable features include packet analysis, packet capture, and [that] it's easy to use."

"The VoLTE model, call search and Media Monitor were essential when we launched VoLTE. We're relying heavily on them to troubleshoot our VoLTE calls."

"The details it provides are among the most valuable features; the ability to drill down and get to the packet level."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to drill down into any kind of troubles that are reported to us, by use of identifiers."

"The ability to be able to do detailed traffic analysis such as top-talkers, application-specific monitoring, and understanding them through patterns, is helpful. We're also able to gain an understanding of voice calls, voice traffic, whether we have packet loss in a certain part of the network or jitter or high latency that might be impacting the network. All of those are nice functionalities."

"It is an easy-to-scale platform."

"The most valuable feature is visibility."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

Cons

"I think if I was to say something that could be improved, it would be a multi-data center nature of the implementation."

"Initial setup was complex."

"We would like better end-to-end data flows. This is something that my users always complain about, as they don't know what the data flows are on the network. We would like to know every point along the line."

"One of the products we use is SolarWinds, and it provides a very cool mapping of an agent from end-to-end. If NETSCOUT could somehow implement that into their design... make it quicker and easier to get those net paths, it would be huge."

"It's not intuitive, it's not simple to use. It is probably the only monitoring tool, out of all the ones that I have, that I really need an expert on, an expert from nGenius, a contractor that I have to pay, to manage the tool. And that's because it's simply not easy to use. Netscout needs to focus on making it easier to use."

"Some of the filters could be easier to see and to set up. That's the only thing that I've ever had any trouble with."

"Initially, we were having a lot of issues with bugs when using version 6.1.1. There were a lot of problems with the dashboard causing confusion. We worked with our SE and the NETSCOUT engineering team to fix the visibility with the data. There should be a patch release to fix this issue. However, this seems to be working fine for us right now after the 6.2.2 upgrade."

"There is currently less visibility or GUI to analyse the packet for troubleshooting purposes."

"The feature I am looking for is the Arbor technology, especially to run in parallel with our firewall... It's getting there."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of switches that are going to be licensed to run the software."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"We have a premium customized contract for the solution."

"Make sure you get the low down on your licensing and understand the licensing requirements before making a purchase, especially when it comes to an upgrade. Make sure that it suits your needs before you commit to it. For example, we purchased ATA at version 6.2.1. At that time, the licensing covered everything we need. NETSCOUT comes out with 6.2.2, stating that in order to upgrade, you had to purchase CyberStream licensing. Now that requires some additional funding from both a capital investment and a maintenance cost. That's something that should have been said, "Well, if you want these additional features, you will need to purchase these CyberStreams." Otherwise, we should be allowed to continue on the basic operations as it is now through the newer releases without being stuck."

"The license becomes cost prohibitive very quickly."

"Like any company, we always want better pricing. The pricing is okay, but it's not a cheap solution. When you want to deploy it across an enterprise as large as ours, you go into seven figures. It's not a cheap solution to get out there."

"It is a little overall pricey and expensive, but you get what you pay for."

"The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense."

"This solution has saved us more than $50,000 a month and freed up 30 percent of our bandwidth."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product may come across as a cheap tool for some, while it may seem costly for others.

See all answers

Comparisons

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Big Switch Networks

Compared 31% of the time

APCON vs Big Switch Networks

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Big Switch Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Cumulus Networks vs Big Switch Networks

Compared 12% of the time

VMware NSX vs Big Switch Networks

Compared 9% of the time

More Big Switch Networks Competitors

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 12% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

October 2024

Download Big Switch Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

October 2024

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

Learn More

Big Switch Networks

NETSCOUT

Overview

Big Switch Networks is at the forefront of the next-generation of networking technologies. By combining industry standard switch hardware (“white box / branded white box “brite box”) with intelligent SDN control software, the company is delivering next-generation data center networking fabrics for the world’s most advanced data centers looking to achieve unmatched degrees of network automation at cloud-competitive price points.

Big Switch Networks has two data center networking solutions: Big Cloud Fabric, a data center switching fabric for OpenStack clouds or VMware virtualization environments, and Big Monitoring Fabric, a network packet broker that enables pervasive security and security, monitoring data center traffic for inline or out-of-band deployments. Big Switch is taking three key technologies: vendor agnostic switch hardware, SDN control software, and core-and-pod data center designs –and leveraging them for use in next-generation data center switching and monitoring solutions designed for use in enterprises, cloud providers, and service providers.

All Big Switch solutions run on high-performance open networking switches from Accton or Dell Technologies and leverage centralized SDN controller software for fabric-wide control and management. Big Switch Networks has two solutions:

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

Sample Customers

A10 Networks, Edge-Core Networks, Blue Coat Systems, BlueData, Broadcom Corporation, Canonical, Check Point Software Technologies, Citrix, Dell, FireEye, Garland, Hortonworks, Mirantis, Nexenta, Riverbed

Cerner Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aviatrix, Juniper and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN). Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.