Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs OpenText ProVision comparison

BiZZdesign and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #28. BiZZdesign holds a 5.0% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BiZZdesign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Read 17 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews
  • 2,067 Views
  • 948 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
OpenText ProVision
Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews
  • 141 Views
  • 85 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

OpenText ProVision and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are enterprise architecture management tools with distinct functionalities. Based on the analysis, OpenText ProVision appeals to those focused on cost-effectiveness, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers a more comprehensive feature set for users seeking advanced capabilities.

Features: OpenText ProVision is known for its strong process modeling, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers comprehensive modeling tools, strong analytics, and collaboration facilities, making it a powerful option for those looking for an extensive toolkit.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ProVision offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides flexible deployment across diverse environments with proactive support, offering higher adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ProVision has lower initial setup costs and offers a quick ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. BiZZdesign HoriZZon requires a larger initial investment but offers a higher long-term ROI with its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
6th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (11th)
OpenText ProVision
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
28th
Average Rating
6.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (46th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 5.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Architecture Management
 

Featured Reviews

BijoyTalukder - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to get a clear overview of our enterprise architecture, especially when dealing with multiple departments
One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs. While the platform offers REST APIs, they have limitations when it comes to retrieving and exporting data. Obtaining detailed information at the individual application or component level, including IDs, costs, and deployment-related data, can be challenging through these APIs. This limitation makes it difficult to smoothly export such granular data. I have raised this issue with the BiZZdesign team, and they expressed interest in addressing it, but I'm not aware of the current status of this improvement effort. Nonetheless, improving the usability and flexibility of the REST APIs for data extraction is an area that could enhance the platform's capabilities.
Read full review
reviewer1944672 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration
I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization."
"This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool."
"t's a good tool. My colleagues that are making use of it for application, business processes, or data modeling, are very satisfied with it. They find it easy to use. The graphical representation is simple but therefore efficient, so I know that they are planning a very good commencement on the use of these tools."
"The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool."
"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."
"It is very easy to use. I can just click on an application component and find out if we are using this particular component. This provides us flexibility."
"One of the main advantages of this solution is that they have representation in the Open Group Forum, which means that any changes in ArchiMate are immediately implemented in BiZZdesign."
"The tool's most valuable feature is that its collaboration part is very good."
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros
"The stability of the product is very good."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
 

Cons

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."
"Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect."
"This tool is something of a beast - it takes a long time to learn, and it isn't possible for casual users and most architects. Unless a person spends 500 or 1,000 hours on the tool or does very concentrated sessions using all its functionalities, it's very difficult to master."
"The users of BiZZdesign should be able to enter their data or make modeling changes via HoriZZon."
"In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved."
"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."
"The repository of duplicate objects is bad."
"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."
"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."
"The price is reasonable."
"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."
"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."
"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."
"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."
"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult. We don't use the chart functionality much, and I think that is quite problematic at the moment. We have...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
I use the solution in my company for all sorts of things, like enterprise and solution architecture. As part of our design process, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is used for road mapping. We also use it for ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 17% of the time
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 10% of the time
ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 9% of the time
MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 9% of the time
Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 8% of the time
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors
Visio vs OpenText ProVision Logo
Visio vs OpenText ProVision
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText ProVision Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon
April 2025
BiZZdesign HoriZZon reportDownload BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
April 2025
OpenText ProVision reportDownload OpenText ProVision product report
 

Also Known As

HoriZZon
Metastorm ProVision
 

Overview

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

  • Multi-discipline collaboration
  • Data Integration
  • Advanced analytics
  • Models and Roadmaps
  • Governance & Security
  • Business Insight Graph
BiZZdesign
OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance
Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision
April 2025
Free Report: BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision
Find out what your peers are saying about BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.