Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs QPR ProcessDesigner comparison

BiZZdesign and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. BiZZdesign is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while QPR Software is ranked #25. BiZZdesign holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BiZZdesign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.
BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Read 17 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews
  • 1,997 Views
  • 916 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
QPR ProcessDesigner
Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews
  • 196 Views
  • 135 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

QPR ProcessDesigner and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are competing in business process management and enterprise architecture. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers strategic insights, whereas QPR ProcessDesigner focuses on cost-effectiveness and ease of integration.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner is aimed at seamless process modeling, flexible integration, and simplicity. BiZZdesign HoriZZon focuses on extensive analytical features, providing strategic insights and in-depth enterprise architecture analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner provides an easy deployment process with efficient customer support for quick integration. BiZZdesign HoriZZon involves a complex deployment requiring more initial adjustment, with strong support to enhance its capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner is competitively priced and offers rapid ROI, attracting budget-conscious organizations. BiZZdesign HoriZZon has higher setup costs but promises higher ROI through advanced, long-term strategic features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Ranking in Business Process Design
11th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (6th)
QPR ProcessDesigner
Ranking in Business Process Design
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design
 

Featured Reviews

BijoyTalukder - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to get a clear overview of our enterprise architecture, especially when dealing with multiple departments
One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs. While the platform offers REST APIs, they have limitations when it comes to retrieving and exporting data. Obtaining detailed information at the individual application or component level, including IDs, costs, and deployment-related data, can be challenging through these APIs. This limitation makes it difficult to smoothly export such granular data. I have raised this issue with the BiZZdesign team, and they expressed interest in addressing it, but I'm not aware of the current status of this improvement effort. Nonetheless, improving the usability and flexibility of the REST APIs for data extraction is an area that could enhance the platform's capabilities.
Read full review
it_user211722 - PeerSpot reviewer
FactView was easy to use and integrate.
Process simulation Performance monitoring Business intelligence I was a consultant mainly at Standard Bank, I worked for the supplier of the QPR Suite. It was used mainly for balanced scorecard to track organisation performance, but also for process mapping and monitoring as part of their Six…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is that the start times and loading times are short. It takes only a few seconds to load the repository and whenever I want to open diagrams, they are there almost immediately."
"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization."
"Among the valuable features is the ability to document standards. For example, we have mandatory operating standards that need to be followed by every application and every architecture. We use things like table charts and pie charts for documenting the costs incurred across the systems. All of these are good features."
"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."
"t's a good tool. My colleagues that are making use of it for application, business processes, or data modeling, are very satisfied with it. They find it easy to use. The graphical representation is simple but therefore efficient, so I know that they are planning a very good commencement on the use of these tools."
"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is that it allows you to work with different methods, using the same tool."
"BiZZdesign HoriZZon is scalable, and I'd give it an eight out of ten for scalability. Our customers are enterprise level companies, but the solution is suitable for small and mid-sized companies as well."
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros
"​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
 

Cons

"It lacks capabilities with regard to infrastructure modeling."
"The users of BiZZdesign should be able to enter their data or make modeling changes via HoriZZon."
"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."
"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."
"In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved."
"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."
"There is room for improvement in making it more seamless between the modeling and the analysis pieces. Sometimes you have to do some work in the backend to ensure that the HoriZZon portal really gets all of the information the way you want it. They are working on the seamlessness between what they call Enterprise Studio and HoriZZon."
"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."
"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."
"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."
"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."
"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."
"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."
"The price is reasonable."
"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult. We don't use the chart functionality much, and I think that is quite problematic at the moment. We have...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?
I use the solution in my company for all sorts of things, like enterprise and solution architecture. As part of our design process, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is used for road mapping. We also use it for ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 17% of the time
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 10% of the time
ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 9% of the time
MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 9% of the time
Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon Logo
Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon
Compared 8% of the time
More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 53% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 47% of the time
More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon
April 2025
BiZZdesign HoriZZon reportDownload BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2025
QPR ProcessDesigner reportDownload QPR ProcessDesigner product report
 

Also Known As

HoriZZon
ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide
 

Overview

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

  • Multi-discipline collaboration
  • Data Integration
  • Advanced analytics
  • Models and Roadmaps
  • Governance & Security
  • Business Insight Graph
BiZZdesign
Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.
QPR Software
 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance
ALPLA
Buyer's Guide
BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner
April 2025
Free Report: BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner
Find out what your peers are saying about BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.