BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and webMethods.io compete in the enterprise software category, specifically in file transfer and integration solutions. Control-M seems to have the upper hand in real-time monitoring and disaster recovery, while webMethods.io excels in application and business process integrations along with API management.
Features: BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer stands out with its integration with workload automation, robust alerting features, and file encryption during transfer. It also provides a flexible platform with a comprehensive dashboard for better real-time monitoring. WebMethods.io offers strong unit testing and debugging capabilities, impressive data mapping features, and effective application and B2B integrations. Users commend its flexibility in integrating with diverse systems and ease of API management.
Room for Improvement: BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer could enhance its API functionalities and streamline the deployment process of Control-M/Agent. There's also a need for expanded cloud feature availability to improve integration with platforms like AWS and Azure. WebMethods.io could improve the API Gateway's orchestration and documentation, tackle challenges related to version upgrades, and address performance issues with large file transfers, aiming to enhance stability and cost-effectiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has an on-premises deployment and is generally supported well, although some identify limitations in language-specific support and Level 2 support. WebMethods.io offers versatile deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and public clouds. Its technical support is seen as responsive, with some users suggesting improvements in language support and ticket resolution time.
Pricing and ROI: BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is perceived as expensive, with licensing typically based on the number of tasks or jobs, yet many users find the ROI justified by its functionality. WebMethods.io is also seen as costly, mainly for small businesses, but its pricing model is flexible enough to potentially justify expenses for larger enterprises. Despite varied pricing models which might confuse new users, the solution is valued for its features and often provides a good return on investment within a year.
This is the main benefit; when you have everything under control, it prevents you from losing money and time.
BMC provides excellent service.
I have to pay per agent per server, which could be prohibitive for some organizations.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
It is adequate for most scheduling needs.
BMC is already improving in artificial intelligence and integration with cloud.
Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
The best features with MFT are accurate file transfer and visibility for file transfers.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer | 3.6% |
| webMethods.io | 2.4% |
| Other | 94.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
Control-M Managed File Transfer is a market leader in the field of building, scheduling, and managing internal and external file transfers. Users of this solution are able to automate whole portions of the transfer process. They can set up a dynamic scheduling feature, which will activate once a transfer operation has concluded. This automatically updates the schedule of activities that your system is supposed to perform. However, this feature does not stop with simply setting a schedule. After the schedule is updated, the system will set those activities in motion. The automation relieves you of the need to assign a team to write scripts or any kind of manual work. This will ensure that everything runs on schedule while at the same time reducing the amount of resources necessary to make that happen.
Control-M Managed File Transfer has a simplified and unified dashboard. Users are able to view and access all of the system’s file transfer information. This platform provides a high level of visibility and intuitive use. It ensures that users will be able to view any stage of their file transfer operations at any time that they wish. Users can conduct a quick search with specific pre-set search options and find any piece of information they might require.
Key Features
Some of Control-M Managed File Transfer’s key features include:
Reviews from Real Users
Control-M Managed File Transfer stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the robustness of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with other related programs. It is constantly being upgraded to meet the varied needs of its users.
A software engineer at a computer software company notes the robust nature of this solution when he writes, “This solution has a vast amount of features, and with every new release, there are lots of new features introduced. The application has high availability - we have multiple customers and it's highly available. On an application level, if something goes down with the primary, then the application goes over to the secondary, so it's very, very easy to do disaster recovery.”
Another PeerSpot user, who is an RPA-WLA BU director at a tech services company, takes note of how easy it is to use Control-M Managed File Transfer in conjunction with other products. They point out, “It is easy to use and integrate with different solutions. It is a good solution that is easy to implement and deliver.”
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
