Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances productivity and reduces costs by automating processes, improving efficiency, and streamlining operations for growth.
Sentiment score
8.0
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer quickly recovers costs, saves 30%-40% on resources, and enhances IT efficiency through automation.
I have seen a return on investment with ActiveBatch by Redwood, as it is cost-efficient and has improved time management.
This is the main benefit; when you have everything under control, it prevents you from losing money and time.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
ActiveBatch by Redwood's support is praised for quick responses, helpful assistance, and adaptability, despite occasional variation in quality.
Sentiment score
7.2
BMC Control-M's technical support is responsive and knowledgeable, with L3 highly praised and support quality varying by region.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
BMC provides excellent service.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
ActiveBatch by Redwood efficiently manages scalability, supporting thousands of jobs daily with minimal issues across various domains and time zones.
Sentiment score
7.0
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is scalable, robust for various sizes, with users managing operations despite licensing and space challenges.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
I have to pay per agent per server, which could be prohibitive for some organizations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
ActiveBatch by Redwood is reliable and efficient, with minimal downtime and maintenance, enhancing operational efficiency for organizations.
Sentiment score
7.9
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is highly stable, reliable, handles heavy workloads, and receives positive user stability ratings.
 

Room For Improvement

ActiveBatch requires enhanced usability, documentation, mobile alerts, and cloud integration to improve user experience and appeal.
BMC Control-M needs API expansion, cloud integration, user interface improvements, cost reduction, better support, security enhancements, and streamlined deployment.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
It is adequate for most scheduling needs.
BMC is already improving in artificial intelligence and integration with cloud.
 

Setup Cost

ActiveBatch offers good value with flexible licensing, comprehensive features, and is cost-effective compared to other automation tools.
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is costly but valuable, with pricing flexibility and additional module expenses for enterprises.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
 

Valuable Features

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency and workflow with automation, integration, and user-friendly features for seamless operations.
BMC Control-M enhances efficiency and reliability with seamless integration, robust security, flexible transfers, and an intuitive interface.
ActiveBatch by Redwood has positively impacted my organization by efficiently managing a significant volume of data and workflow between our database and applications on the web browser.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
The best features with MFT are accurate file transfer and visibility for file transfers.
 

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
18th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (34th), Workload Automation (19th)
BMC Control-M Managed File ...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer is 3.6%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer3.6%
ActiveBatch by Redwood2.2%
Other94.2%
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation
Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.
SirajShaik - PeerSpot reviewer
Improve operational efficiency through workflow orchestration
Its stability and the feature list are rich compared to other tools in the market. I have experienced a thirty percent reduction in operational time for developers, increasing efficiency in workflow orchestration design. The UI is great, with a minimal learning curve and caters to both click-and-monitor users and those who want to code.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise47
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
The pricing for licensing has increased. I'd rate the pricing three out of ten.
What needs improvement with BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
BMC is already improving in artificial intelligence and integration with cloud. AI can improve and is definitely an area where BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer continues to enhance.
What is your primary use case for BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?
Mostly, customers need to perform file transfers, which is a main use case for many customers. Many customers I worked with use various kinds of file transfers, and I use BMC Control-M Managed File...
 

Also Known As

ActiveBatch
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital
British Sky Broadcasting
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.