ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.5, while Redwood Software is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.6. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.1% mindshare in WA, compared to Redwood Software’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,146 Views
714 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redwood RunMyJobs

Read 30 Redwood RunMyJobs reviews

2,413 Views
1,115 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Redwood RunMyJobs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

ActiveBatch and Redwood RunMyJobs compete in the automation software category. ActiveBatch has the upper hand in centralized monitoring ease, while Redwood RunMyJobs excels in integration capabilities and real-time event monitoring.

Features: ActiveBatch offers centralized job monitoring through a user-friendly interface, simplifying job tracking and reducing manual effort. It provides extensive customization options for job configuration. Its centralized visibility supports efficient workflow management. Redwood RunMyJobs enhances workflow efficiency with its broad integration capabilities, supporting complex environments. Real-time event monitoring allows for quicker error detection and resolution, enhancing reliability. It also offers capabilities to streamline cloud and on-premise integrations.

Room for Improvement: ActiveBatch users indicate areas to improve in navigation and mobile alert systems; better support for cloud environments is also needed. Concerns about pricing for advanced integrations and learning curve exist. Redwood RunMyJobs could benefit from enhanced monitoring and alert services, better UC/CI/CD integration features, and expanding cloud-native functionalities along with machine learning capabilities to support more advanced use cases.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: ActiveBatch offers various deployment options, including on-premises and cloud solutions, though customer service feedback is mixed, with some reports of slow response times. Redwood RunMyJobs efficiently supports hybrid and public cloud settings and is noted for its responsive customer service, though improvements in documentation and engagement would benefit users.

Pricing and ROI: ActiveBatch users acknowledge the tool's comprehensive feature set for its cost, although some note increased costs due to pricing model changes. Strong ROI is mentioned via automation success and job efficiency. Redwood RunMyJobs is viewed as cost-effective with lower setup expenses, providing robust functionality for price, achieving strong ROI through enhanced workflow efficiency while initial setup might be costly for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

6th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th)

Redwood RunMyJobs

Ranking in Workload Automation

2nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redwood RunMyJobs is 4.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

MaheshKumar6

Senior Analyst at Electronics For Imaging, Inc

Future-proof and powerful with great support

Improvements include: 1) Cost of the Software. Redwood is more expensive than most of the other Automation Software available today; they could make it budget-friendly. 2) It has limited reporting features. Some basic reporting features are missing. 3) There is no option to extract data in Excel. This feature could help in finding errors in the data. 4) Integration with ServiceNow is not supported. 5) The cloud platform compatibility is not up to the mark. 6) Security standards need to be improved. 7) Handling failure is not great; the workflow stops when a job fails and human intervention is required. 8) Configuration and set-up are difficult for someone with less coding knowledge. 9) They need to provide more documentation to assist new users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"By implementing a sophisticated scheduling mechanism, the system allows for the precise triggering of jobs at user-selected frequencies, enabling a seamless and automated execution of tasks according to specified time intervals."

"ActiveBatch provides summary reports and logs for further analysis and improvements in monitoring servers, which is very handy."

"Easy to configure and simple to develop new features."

"The user interface is really incredible."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"By automating the job processes it has saved us a lot of time and resources."

"There won't be a memory outage issue, as it uses its own server/ECC memory only."

"We can achieve anything that anything that we would like to do. In SAP, it's not generally possible with just with SAP. So we have solution manager as an option, but run by job."

"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."

"One of Redwood Software's features that I liked was its event-driven automation, which allows IT teams to respond to real-time events, alerts, and notifications from numerous systems."

"Redwood is more flexible and we can schedule the tasks based on different time zones."

"Redwood RunMyJobs has been very useful for job scheduling and checking and monitoring jobs."

"It conjures simplicity from the depths of complexity, effortlessly shouldering burdensome workloads."

More Redwood RunMyJobs pros

Cons

"Whenever there is an overload, we are seeing crashes happening."

"The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."

"I have faced struggles to understand, set up the tool, and implement it in my early days as a new user."

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"As more organizations are moving towards a cloud-based infrastructure, ActiveBatch could incorporate more capabilities that support popular cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"Adding machine learning and AI capabilities would enable Redwood to automate more complex business processes and tasks."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing to new users with limited technical knowledge."

"Currently, our developers aren't able to access their own objects in the user acceptance testing server and production system server as they are assigned the developer access role, which is kind of a solid role, and no changes or additions can be made to it."

"Having a graphical user interface for the dashboard would be great."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing and accessible to a wide range of users."

"It has limited reporting features; some basic reporting features are missing."

"The documentation for this product is limited, which can be improved in the future."

"The product could be better in terms of its monitoring and alert service."

More Redwood RunMyJobs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"It initially surprised me because we went from an application that was priced by connection to agents/the number of agents to an application that was priced based on the number of job executions. At that time, many of the products we looked at were also priced on job execution. That seems to be more common in the business or in the vendors that provide solutions out there, but that was probably our biggest difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

What do you like most about Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

In Redwood Automation, we can easily fetch the daily reports from the system as per the client's requirement and track the status of every job which is running, aborted, or canceled.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

As compared to Control-M and UC4, the setup cost and pricing of Redwood are far less as they are delivering good functionality at this price point.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

There are fewer cons in Redwood as compared to other tools available in the market. That said, it would be a great thing if they would provide a few new features, like a health dashboard and a few ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 30% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 23% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

VisualCron vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Control-M vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 44% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 13% of the time

Automic Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 12% of the time

Stonebranch vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 10% of the time

More Redwood RunMyJobs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

January 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs

January 2025

Download Redwood RunMyJobs product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition, Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, RunMyJobs, Redwood RunMyJobs

Learn More

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Redwood Software

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

Redwood Software is a prominent player in the enterprise automation space, known for its robust and scalable solutions. It caters to a wide range of industries, offering tools for IT and business process automation. Redwood Software users on PeerSpot often highlights the flexibility and robustness of the solutions. Many users commend the platform for its ability to automate complex and time-consuming processes, which has led to significant time and cost savings. Additionally, the strong customer support and continuous updates are frequently mentioned, indicating a commitment to evolving with customer needs and technological advancements.

Redwood Software offers a holistic suite of automation tools, covering areas such as finance automation, IT process automation, and robotic process automation (RPA). This comprehensive approach ensures that various aspects of business operations can be automated, leading to increased efficiency and reduced manual intervention. Redwood Software is a cloud-native platform, which offers scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs.

Redwood Software users shares that its user interfaces is intuitive and this is reducing the learning curve and enabling users across different departments to leverage automation tools effectively. The platform offers sophisticated scheduling and workflow capabilities, allowing for the automation of complex processes.

Redwood Software excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of systems and applications. This integration is key for enterprises that operate in diverse IT environments, ensuring that automation can be implemented across different platforms and applications without compatibility issues. Another important factor for enterprises, is focus on compliance and security, Redwood Software incorporates robust security measures and compliance protocols.

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

AMD, American Home Shield, Avaya, Burberry, Centrica, City of Dallas, The Container Store, Core & Main, Daikin, Dart Containers, Deere, Energizer, Epson, Halliburton, Keen Foodware, National Gypsum, Rockport Group, Ryder, Technicolor, The University of Michigan, Virgin Money, Whitbread

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

January 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.