Control-M offers extensive integration capabilities and flexibility, excelling in support and deployment. In comparison, Redwood RunMyJobs is noted for its user friendliness and cost-effective pricing, providing a higher ROI. Each solution caters differently depending on specific needs and budget considerations.
AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.
IBM Workload Automation is chosen for its robust scheduling and versatile integration. In comparison, Redwood RunMyJobs is highlighted for its user-friendly interface and seamless cloud integration. IBM offers value through cost-effectiveness, while Redwood excels in operational efficiency and ease of deployment.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
Tidal by Redwood excels in job scheduling, reporting, and handling complex workflows. In comparison, Redwood RunMyJobs offers great integration options and ease of setup automation. Tidal prioritizes power and flexibility, while Redwood RunMyJobs focuses on user-friendly, budget-friendly solutions with simpler integrations.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
ActiveBatch by Redwood is used for data processing, automation, job scheduling, file transfers, server monitoring, and platform integration. It supports calculations, reporting, updates, and IT operations. Users benefit from centralized management and real-time monitoring. Improvements needed include better documentation, cloud support, UI, triggers, dashboards, reporting, and machine learning features.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
Redwood RunMyJobs offers competitive pricing, straightforward deployment, and responsive support, appealing to businesses seeking simplicity and cost efficiency. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS provides advanced integration capabilities, high reliability, and superior customer service, making it ideal for complex, large-scale implementations.
It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year.
This is a good product at a fair price.
It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year.
This is a good product at a fair price.
Axway Automator aids in task automation, enhancing operational efficiency. Notable features include scheduling flexibility and robust integration capabilities. Users appreciate the efficient resource management but mention that updates could be more seamless and better customer support is needed.
