BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs Quest SharePlex comparison

The compared BMC and Quest Software solutions aren't in the same category. BMC is ranked #21 in DDM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.6% mindshare in the category. Quest Software is ranked #48 in DI , and holds a 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Read 2 BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS reviews

67 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,622 Views
980 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Quest SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Quest SharePlex and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS compete in database management. Quest SharePlex is preferred for budget-conscious organizations due to pricing and support, while BMC provides an edge for environments requiring comprehensive features.

Features: Quest SharePlex provides efficient data replication, integration, and minimal downtime, ideal for mid-sized firms seeking simplicity and reliable performance. BMC Data Management offers advanced data optimization, auditing capabilities, and compliance tools, positioned for enterprises with large-scale critical data needs, fitting more complex deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest SharePlex ensures easy deployment and effective customer support, facilitating a smooth user experience. BMC Data Management comes with a complex deployment process requiring extensive configuration but offers comprehensive support for intricate setups.

Pricing and ROI: Quest SharePlex caters to cost-efficient businesses with lower setup costs and strong ROI. BMC Data Management, although more expensive initially, delivers significant ROI in high-performance environments with advanced features, justifying its higher cost for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Data Management for IMS...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st)

Quest SharePlex

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (48th)

Mindshare comparison

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS and Quest SharePlex aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS is designed for Database Development and Management and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, down 0.6% compared to last year.
Quest SharePlex, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 0.7% mindshare, down 0.8% since last year.

Database Development and Management

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

ManishJain7

Architect, Database Administration at Maximus

Excellent replication with good stability and very helpful support

I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training. Also, maybe if we could have a seperate section of showing out-of-sync tables in Foglight, instead of looking into the "warning" messages.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

Cons

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Insurance Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution. As someone involved in managing infrastructure, understandi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

From my perspective as an infrastructure guy, the most valuable aspect of BMC's data management solutions was their ability to optimize CPU cycles, improving IMS performance without directly impact...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dataloader.io vs BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS

Compared 100% of the time

More BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 65% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

Fivetran vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

January 2025

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS report

Download BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

February 2025

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Also Known As

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS, Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Transform the management of your DB2 databases to meet the scale and complexity of digital business

Run DB2 utilities with BMC Next Generation Technology to optimize your data and improve application performance
Eliminate downtime and increase availability of business services
Ensure the integrity of structured and unstructured data
Take control with intelligent automation and policy-driven rules
Bridge the gap from green-screen to modern, secure, self-service user interfaces
Move to DB2 12 and beyond with confidence

BMC

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Airline Tariff Publishing Co (ATPCO), AtTask, MetaScale

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex

February 2025

Free Report: BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs. Quest SharePlex report.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.