Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs DX Performance Management comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category. BMC is ranked #1, while Broadcom is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. BMC holds a 33.3% mindshare in ICP, compared to Broadcom’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
BMC TrueSight Capacity Opti...
Read 2 BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization reviews
  • 305 Views
  • 84 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
DX Performance Management
Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews
  • 49 Views
  • 30 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization and DX Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight Capacity Opti...
Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning
1st
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DX Performance Management
Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (57th), DX NetOps (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization is 33.3%, up from 32.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Performance Management is 8.8%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure Capacity Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Appperf677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level
Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.
Read full review
Sandip Kheni - PeerSpot reviewer
The vertical database loads faster than any other product available
We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."
"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"
"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."
"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you.​"
"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels... are all very intuitive."
"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass."
"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."
"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."
"The most valuable feature of DX Performance Management is the quick way we can collect data without putting much effort. They have a lot of customization and features with the solution internally and out of the box. We can discover the device, and start collecting information. For example, if the device is available, we can receive the CPU and memory utilization, and the interface optimization is simple and very fast to implement."
"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."
"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."
More DX Performance Management pros
 

Cons

"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."
"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."
"Policies could be improved."
"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."
"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."
"It needs role-based administration."
"There are some areas in the technology right now, like with VMs, where we are lacking with our abilities to get inside the VM to monitor traffic within the machine."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."
"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."
More DX Performance Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."
"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
19%
Media Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about DX Performance Management?
The tool helps us understand network performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?
The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.
See all answers
What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?
Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management
Compared 37% of the time
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management
Compared 34% of the time
DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management Logo
DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management
Compared 29% of the time
More DX Performance Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

No data available
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management
March 2025
DX Performance Management reportDownload DX Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization
CA Performance Management
 

Overview

TrueSight Capacity Optimization is a digital enterprise management solution that aligns IT resources with service demands and business priorities, resulting in on-time service delivery and optimized costs. 

Applications and IT infrastructure need to work together

  • Reserve and schedule IT infrastructure resources for onboarding applications day-one
  • Forecast and model changes in demand to adjust IT resources as needed
  • Optimize the use of cloud services with visibility for best placement and cost of service
  • Plan and optimize your Hadoop infrastructure and budget
  • Report the cost of IT resources to business and IT stakeholders


BMC

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Dilliard's
Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Buyer's Guide
BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management
March 2025
Free Report: BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization vs. DX Performance Management report.
See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.