We performed a comparison between Broadcom Network Flow Analysis and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to have visibility. We deal with cybersecurity, so visibility is very important."
"It is an overall stable solution."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"The calculations part is the most valuable."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The product is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see more security features, like a lost protection package."
"Currently, Broadcom Network Flow Analysis does not support high-availability solutions, making it an area that needs improvement."
"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."
"One of the things we don't like is that Zabbix has a license structure with a price that is high compared to the competition. It's very high, for example, compared to something like Microsoft Teams."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
More Broadcom Network Flow Analysis Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is ranked 65th in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is rated 8.4, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Network Flow Analysis writes "A stable tool that helps identify the complete flow analysis in a network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is most compared with WatchTower Security Management App, Wireshark and SCOM, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.