Buildkite vs Jenkins comparison

Buildkite and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Buildkite is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 92% of Buildkite users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

Buildkite

Read 14 Buildkite reviews

254 Views
99 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,156 Views
3,557 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Buildkite

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and Buildkite compete in the continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) space. While both offer robust platforms, Jenkins has the upper hand with its extensive plugin support, offering greater flexibility and customization.

Features: Jenkins provides extensive plugin support, flexibility, and scalability, allowing users to build pipelines and integrate with various tools. Buildkite offers ease in workflow management through YAML configurations, effective caching mechanisms for Docker containers, and a streamlined deployment process.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could enhance its interface for a modern look and improve the stability and usability of less common plugins. Specific issues exist with some plugins and integration with certain systems like Docker. Buildkite needs better third-party integration, improved plugin flexibility, and faster resolution of scalability concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, offering flexibility but can be complex to set up initially. Its strong community support is vast due to its open-source nature, though official customer support is limited. Buildkite primarily operates in the public cloud environment, providing simpler deployment for cloud-native setups. Both benefit from strong community support, but Jenkins's open-source model promotes more community-driven solutions, whereas Buildkite’s commercial model offers a more unified customer experience.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is free and open-source, making it cost-effective for businesses investing in setup and maintenance. It offers a significant ROI through improved productivity and reduced operational costs via automation. Buildkite's pricing is user-based and may be more accessible in terms of initial and ongoing costs, which is beneficial for teams using cloud solutions for deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Buildkite vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. Jenkins

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Buildkite

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Prabin Silwal

Senior Engineering Consultant at ASSURANCE IQ, INC.

Has an easy setup phase while also offering good documentation

The problem we are facing sometimes is that we have lots of unit testers, and we have to wait about ten minutes to complete all of those because we want to run or find a way. It's not directly due to the limitation of the tool as well, but when we are running the spec, we want to run those parallelly and decrease the downtime so that our deployment can be faster. I think that one is not possible only due to the it also depends upon the unit test framework as well we are using. When we tried with the multiple test cases in a parallel manner, there were some dependencies, and one over another kept failing. We make those sequential calls. The aforementioned area consists of the issues my company faced while using Buildkite.

Read full review

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you join our team, it's very easy to learn Buildkite. We have our own boilerplate, so you can just clone it and add your configuration steps. Plus, we have documentation available to guide you through the process."

"The tool's flexibility with pipelines gave us a lot of advantages, especially when managing a huge amount of microservices."

"Buildkite's UI is particularly intuitive, making it simple to add steps to your pipeline. It also provides detailed logging."

"The tool is simple and has no learning curve. If you know YAML, you can master it. It is simple to learn."

"You don't have to set up an agent in Buildkite like in Jenkins."

"Buildkite allows us to build automations and integration tasks effectively."

"Using Buildkite, it's much easier to manage pipelines. It's straightforward to understand what each pipeline returns, making it easy to edit configurations, such as passwords. Although there is a steep learning curve initially, the overall process is still comprehensible. Additionally, Buildkite offers features like hooks and triggers; for example, an action in the app can automatically trigger a pipeline. These elements can be added to specific pipelines, ensuring the entire process is automated."

"What I like best about Buildkite is its workflow management. You define YAML files to specify what needs to be done. The jobs can run based on a schedule, like a cron job, where you set it to run every night or every week. Additionally, you can set up triggers, such as new pushes to a repository."

More Buildkite pros

"Jenkins is the most widely used development tool, so there are many plugins and it's easy to integrate. There is a large user base to provide community support, which I find very valuable. If I need to find a better way to do something, I can always get help from the community. Automation is about thinking outside of the box, and other users are constantly adding new plugins."

"It is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are the ease of use and the information about how to use the features is readily available on the internet. Additionally, with the solution, I can use other reporting tools, such as Flow."

"This solution has helped us in automating the build and test process, reducing time."

"I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company."

"We can schedule anything with Jenkins, which is useful for deployment or anything that requires scheduling. It also has multiple plugins we can use for Maven, JUnit, etc."

"I can install Jenkins for integration from multiple developers and automate application delivery, staging, and production environments."

"Jenkins optimizes the CI/CD process, enhances automation, and ensures efficiency and management of our build and deployment pipeline."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"BuildKite should follow some providers like GitHub Actions. They can offer a shared agent or cloud agent."

"Since we were using Buildkite for the first time, we had a lot of difficulty understanding how it worked. We didn't find any documentation from third parties; only Buildkite provided documentation. As a result, we faced a steep learning curve. After some time, it became much easier to use. Initially, understanding certain features, like the R integration, was challenging."

"I would like to see some improvements in the hooks implementation."

"My company has had problems with the tool's parallel running and execution time. The testing framework also has some limitations. The tool cannot do everything."

"The solution should offer more options for installing an agent and give users the option of having a separate self-hosted or provisioned agent."

"Buildkite has issues while creating or extending branches as only the first five builds in the user-interface can be accessed and post that one has to access the next builds by remembering branch names without pagination which can be inconvenient."

"Based on the load, the agents can be scaled up and scaled down, and while they are scaling up, sometimes they just get stuck."

"The product must provide better integration with other tools."

More Buildkite cons

"The solution's UI can use a facelift and the logs can use more detailed information."

"And I don't care too much for the Jenkins user interface. It's not that user-friendly compared to other solutions available right now. It's not a great user experience. You can do just fine if you are a techie, but it would take a novice some time to learn it and get things done."

"In our case, we have several products built using Jenkins. It is quite difficult to navigate into the latest stable build in a given OS."

"I sometimes face a bottleneck when installing the plugins on an offline machine. Mapping the dependencies and then installing the correct sequence of dependencies is a nightmare, and it took me two days to do it."

"The learning curve is quite steep at the moment."

"Partition security for the workflow of projects is not yet an option."

"UI is quite outdated."

"The documentation could be more friendly, and more examples of how to use it."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The self-hosted option is pretty cheap."

"I don't think the tool is expensive."

"For a business plan, it was 19 USD per month per user."

"Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features."

"I find Buildkite cost-effective as it has definitely increased my productivity, especially on the deployment side. It saved a lot of my time and improved data management because I can handle different environments myself now."

"The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses."

"We used the solution’s free version."

"The solution is open source."

"We are using the freeware version of Jenkins."

"Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"The solution is one of the lowest costs compared to competitors."

"It is an open source."

"Jenkins is open source and free."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Buildkite?

One area that needs improvement in Buildkite is the requirement for rework of the code. There can be syntax errors when running the Buildkite pipeline, especially if someone has made manual changes...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Buildkite?

I use Buildkite for deployment tasks related to building AMI images and deploying routing profile queues into Amazon Connect. This involves using Buildkite in conjunction with GitHub. We create fil...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Buildkite?

With two years of experience on Buildkite, I would recommend it to others due to its manageable pipeline and the support team available for big issues. I am satisfied with it, rating its stability ...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Buildkite

Compared 65% of the time

Tekton vs Buildkite

Compared 35% of the time

More Buildkite Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite

March 2025

Download Buildkite product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

March 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Overview

Buildkite is a powerful CI/CD tool praised for its scalability and flexibility in automating and managing complex workflows across multiple platforms. Its integration capabilities with various systems and supports for secure, customizable environments enhance development efficiency and data privacy. The feedback highlights significant boosts in productivity and operational cost reduction, making Buildkite a strategic asset for businesses aiming to streamline development tasks and align with organizational goals.

Buildkite

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. Jenkins

March 2025

Free Report: Buildkite vs. Jenkins

Find out what your peers are saying about Buildkite vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Buildkite vs. Jenkins report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.