C3M Cloud Control [EOL] vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks comparison

CyberArk and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

C3M Cloud Control [EOL]

Read 2 C3M Cloud Control [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...

Read 114 Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks reviews

23,019 Views
12,660 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

C3M Cloud Control [EOL]

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and C3M Cloud Control [EOL] compete in cloud security solutions. Prisma Cloud leads with superior support and pricing structures, while C3M Cloud Control [EOL] stands out with advanced features.

Features:Prisma Cloud integrates multifaceted security measures, threat detection across various cloud environments, and automated remediation capabilities. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] provides continuous compliance management and robust risk assessment tools, with the main differentiator being Prisma Cloud's extensive support for multi-cloud environments and C3M Cloud's compliance focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Prisma Cloud emphasizes a seamless deployment process and proactive customer support, aligning with diverse IT infrastructures. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] offers straightforward deployment tailored for compliance checks and attentive support. Prisma's deployment flexibility suits complex ecosystems, while C3M Cloud’s approach benefits compliance-centric security needs.

Pricing and ROI:Prisma Cloud features competitively structured pricing aligned with organizational security scales, often leading to favorable ROI due to its broad functionality. C3M Cloud Control [EOL] presents a value proposition through specialized compliance capabilities, offering excellent ROI for businesses prioritizing regulatory adherence. The distinction lies in Prisma Cloud's broad value without compromising cost versus C3M’s niche-focused financial advantage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,656 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

C3M Cloud Control [EOL]

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (9th), Container Security (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (2nd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (2nd)

Featured Reviews

BRUNO REYNAUD

Information Security Engineer - Pre-sales at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Reduces analysts workload, highly reliable, and scales well

We utilize C3M Cloud Control solely for demonstration purposes as there are limited cloud-based assets to work with. Our aim is to showcase to customers how they can reduce unnecessary permissions in their cloud environment The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable…

Read full review

reviewer2776578

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Image scanning has supported consistent security practices during cloud deployment

On a scale of ten, we would say people are happy with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for the part we use. People are okay with it. We probably would give an eight. We don't give ten because if we don't use the other parts of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, it's because it was difficult to implement from an operational point of view. We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts. People have other tools and in the end, we don't use the full capabilities of a product that we pay for. It's partially related to the difficulty to integrate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks runtime in our company's support process. We don't use the real-time monitoring part of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. We don't know about the automated remediation feature of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The remediation capability of C3M Cloud Control is its most valuable feature as it significantly reduces the workload for analysts, saving them a considerable amount of time."

"We haven't had an issue with stability so far."

"Prisma Cloud's real-time detection and monitoring of our entire system is the most useful."

"The ability to monitor the artifact repository is one of the most valuable features because we have a disparate set of development processes, but everything tends to land in a common set of artifact repositories. The solution gives us a single point where we can apply security control for monitoring. That's really helpful."

"Prisma Cloud also provides the visibility and control you need, regardless of how complex or distributed your cloud environments become. It helps to simplify that complexity. Now we know what the best practices are, and if something is missing we know."

"It has helped us understand the dynamic topology of our containers, and manage security through the application of policies that our pipelines apply straight from Git."

"The CSPM and CWPP functionalities are pretty good."

"Prisma Cloud's most important feature is its auto-remediation."

"The most valuable features are the alerts and auto-remediation because it allows us a lot of flexibility to customize and do things the Palo Alto team never intended. We faced some challenges with certificates because we also have next-gen firewalls. We would like to equip all the traffic because there have been many cases in which the developers have done things by mistake. Deploying certificates on virtual machines can be complex in a development environment, but we managed to do that with Prisma Cloud."

"It has a feature for customized security policy. I implement it in banking, health insurance, and other sectors, and every organization has its own customized policies and procedures. In Prisma Cloud, you can customize policies, and based on that, you can do monitoring."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks pros

Cons

"From our perspective, at this point, we need something called risk scoring as you get a lot of alerts, and sometimes you don't know which one's really going to cost if you don't take care of it. We need to understand, at a glance, which items are priorities."

"C3M Cloud Control could improve by adding features to support infrastructure instead of only trying to solve identities in the cloud."

"The UI is the worst."

"The regional cost of Prisma Cloud in South Africa is high and could be improved."

"The licensing is a bit confusing."

"The UI could be improved."

"Currently, custom reports are available, but I feel that those reports are targeting just the L1 or L2 engineers because they are very verbose. So, for every alert, there is a proper description, but as a security posture management portal, Prisma Cloud should give me a dashboard that I can present to my stakeholders, such as CSO, CRO, or CTO. It should be at a little bit higher level. They should definitely put effort into reporting because the reporting does not reflect the requirements of a dashboard for your stakeholders. There are a couple of things that are present on the portal, but we don't have the option to customize dashboards or widgets. There are a limited set of widgets, and those widgets don't add value from the perspective of a security team or any professional who is above L1 or L2 level. Because of this, the reach of Prisma Cloud in an organization or the access to Prisma Cloud will be limited only to L1 and L2 engineers. This is something that their development team should look into."

"This solution is more AWS and Azure-centric. It needs to be more specific on the GCP side, which they are working on."

"I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal."

"The UX part of Prisma's user interface could be simplified and the metrics tool should be highlighted more."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the support of C3M Cloud Control an eight out of ten."

"The product is very expensive, but the cost is a necessary evil; I don't know how we could have any kind of cloud presence without this type of monitoring. The pricing is calculated by module and resource usage. Ultimately, it saves us money in the amount of time we would spend uncovering what it uncovers, and we might not make the required discoveries without it anyway. Prisma offers incredible value, though I wish it were cheaper."

"Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year."

"Prisma Cloud is more expensive than some other solutions, but when we consider all of its use cases, the cost averages out."

"The price for Prisma Cloud is reasonable."

"I don't know a better way to do it, but their licensing is a little confusing. That's due to the breadth of different types of technologies they are trying to cover. The way you license depends on where you're securing. When they were Twistlock it was a simple licensing scheme and you could tell what you were doing. Now that they've changed that scheme with Palo Alto, it is quite confusing. It's very difficult to predict what your costs are going to be as you try to expand coverage."

"Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has helped the company save some money. Cost-wise, it's okay."

"The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your primary use case for Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?

Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.

See all answers

What Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform do you recommend?

We like Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, since it offers us incredible visibility into our entire cloud system. We are able to easily see where our container vulnerabilities lie and and where cl...

See all answers

What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs C3M Cloud Control [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More C3M Cloud Control [EOL] Competitors

Wiz vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Cyera vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

February 2026

Download C3M Cloud Control [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

February 2026

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks report

Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto

Overview

C3M Cloud Control is a 100% API based Cloud Security Posture Management and Compliance Assurance platform that offers an enterprise complete cloud control through actionable cloud security intelligence across your AWS, GCP, and Azure infrastructure.

CyberArk

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.

Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.

What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?

Dynamic Workload Identity: Enables unique workload identities for security purposes.
Automated Forensics: Offers detailed insights into threats and incidents automatically.
Runtime Protection: Provides ongoing detection and blocking of suspicious activities.
Multi-Cloud Security: Protects environments on AWS, Azure, and GCP simultaneously.
Compliance Management: Assists in meeting regulatory standards across cloud platforms.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens cloud defense lines with proactive monitoring.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers unified oversight of multiple cloud environments.
Efficient Misconfiguration Handling: Quickly identifies and addresses security lapses.
Seamless CI/CD Integration: Integrates security within development workflows.
Improved Visibility: Provides transparent insights into security operations and alerts.

Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne and others in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.