CA App Synthetic Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Broadcom and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while SolarWinds is ranked #53 with an average rating of 6.0. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

309 Views
176 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

639 Views
371 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

CA App Synthetic Monitor and SolarWinds Pingdom are two leading tools for synthetic monitoring. Users seem to prefer SolarWinds Pingdom for its advanced features, while CA App Synthetic Monitor receives positive feedback for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features:CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out for its real-time performance monitoring, intuitive setup, and affordability. SolarWinds Pingdom is highly appreciated for its comprehensive monitoring solutions, including uptime, transaction monitoring, and versatile features.

Room for Improvement:Users indicate that CA App Synthetic Monitor could benefit from improved customization options, better reporting capabilities, and more detailed alerts. SolarWinds Pingdom could address user concerns by enhancing alerting systems, offering more competitive pricing, and improving customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CA App Synthetic Monitor is commended for its quick and straightforward deployment with reliable support. SolarWinds Pingdom also offers a streamlined deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer service responsiveness. While both provide easy deployment, CA App Synthetic Monitor is noted for better support consistency.

Pricing and ROI:CA App Synthetic Monitor offers a more affordable initial setup and delivers satisfactory ROI according to user feedback. SolarWinds Pingdom, although pricier, is perceived as offering significant value due to its extensive features. Users acknowledge the higher cost of Pingdom but feel the ROI justifies the expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

46th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

53rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

51%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Pingdom?

One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Pingdom?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Pingdom?

SolarWinds Pingdom and Cloudflare are third-party applications that we utilize through a browser without any additional setup. We simply rely on their services, which is why I lack familiarity with...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 39% of the time

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 38% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 23% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

No data available

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

April 2025

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.