CA Deliver vs QlikView comparison

Broadcom and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Broadcom is ranked #45, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

CA Deliver

Read 3 CA Deliver reviews

77 Views
13 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 161 QlikView reviews

1,651 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Deliver

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and CA Deliver operate in different technology domains but have overlapping use cases in enterprise solutions. QlikView often appears advantageous due to its strong analytics and visualization capabilities.

Features: QlikView offers data integration, dynamic dashboards, and real-time analysis. In-memory data processing further distinguishes its analytics efficiency. CA Deliver's strengths include reliable large-volume document deliveries, automated workflows, and comprehensive distribution solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView allows for straightforward implementation and rapid deployment which minimizes time to operational status. CA Deliver has an intricate deployment process, but it offers extensive support which is beneficial for enterprises with dedicated resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView provides flexible pricing options and rapid ROI through its quick analytical insights and decision support systems. CA Deliver might require a higher initial investment due to substantial infrastructure needs; however, it promises long-term ROI by improving document management efficiency, offering a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Deliver vs. QlikView Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Deliver

Ranking in Reporting

45th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of CA Deliver is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 3.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting

Featured Reviews

it_user346092

Senior Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It's in essence a digital bank that keep customer information for 40 to 50 years, accessible 24/7.

It’s an archiving solution with all the support of CA. All your customer data flows through it, from their names to all their other details The benefits are that it keeps their information for over 40 to 50 years, so in essence it's a digital bank for customer information. This means that the…

Read full review

Arjun Meda

Assistant Vice President at HSBC India

Useful for data visualization and business intelligence

Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having one repository for various output formats and retention periods. Provides the flexibility to establish hundreds of different retention entries, based upon business need, and then group the like retention period outputs together on the same media. It is very efficient."

"Flexibility of report configuration; allows for quick and simple amendments to definitions."

"The user interface and dashboards are very good."

"We use QlikView for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with databases."

"The initial setup is not very complex."

"Easy to analyze data by click-through."

"It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations."

"It's pretty easy to deploy."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its associative data model. It allows me to discover hidden data and gain insights that are not immediately visible."

"Once you open it up, you see everything that you can do."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"Needs ability to allow export to xls/pdf, etc. (Note: this is available in add-on product CA – OM Web Viewer)."

"A common theme with all CA products is they state compatibility with new technologies when it has not yet been proven. I cite the example that CA mainframe products were deemed to be compatible with Extended Address Volumes (EAV) - larger sized disk volumes - when they were not."

"Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time."

"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of a feature that would allow us to add a common library of (our) commands used in load scripts and expressions, so with a keyword, we would get a drop down to select the command we are looking for, as opposed to the generic help."

"There's room for improvement in the area of management's handling of concerns."

"It would be nice if QlikView could be plugged in into the company's website or an online portal such as QlikSense is capable of. There are ways around but it takes enormous time to develop."

"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."

"More/newer visualisation components need to be added."

"For me, it is important to have a mix, what is the "view" and what is the "sense", Qlik Sense. They have two tools, but for me it is important to have only one tool, which combines the functions that we have from one side and the other side."

"QlikView certainly lacks in its ability to share visualizations or create visualizations easily."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable, licensing model suitable for large enterprises."

"Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."

"Pricing is a bit too high and I think licenses should be unlimited."

"The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."

"The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."

"It is expensive for small companies."

"QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

April 2025

Download CA Deliver product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

March 2025

Download QlikView product report

Overview

CA Deliver is an online report management system that provides you with tools to manage and reduce the cost of report distribution. Able to be utilized by itself or in conjunction with other enterprise report management solutions from CA Technologies, CA Deliver uses the power of the mainframe to automate the day-to-day report management functions of distribution, tracking and printing.

Broadcom

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

ERGO

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

CA Deliver vs. QlikView

March 2025

Free Report: CA Deliver vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Deliver vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Deliver vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.