CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack comparison

Broadcom and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #71, while Grafana Labs is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Grafana Labs’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

159 Views
118 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 9 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

692 Views
501 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Grafana Enterprise Stack are competing in network monitoring and data visualization. Grafana Enterprise Stack seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced visualization and integration features, making it more comprehensive for in-depth data analysis.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor focuses on monitoring network performance and communication systems efficiently. It provides detailed insights into network health, offers structured support, and facilitates seamless integration into existing environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides advanced visualization tools, integrates with multiple data sources, and allows customizable dashboards, delivering a versatile data exploration experience.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its integration with modern data systems, improve its reporting functionalities, and expand its support for cloud environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack could simplify its learning curve for new users, offer more straightforward out-of-the-box solutions, and optimize its pricing model for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment model with structured support services tailored for network environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premise solutions, supported by a strong global community and professional services. CA's deployment is seamless, while Grafana offers flexibility and extensive community support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires an upfront investment with a predictable cost structure, aiming for quick ROI through improved network management. Grafana Enterprise Stack presents variable pricing based on deployment needs and feature sets, justifying the investment through comprehensive analysis capabilities that enhance data insights and long-term efficiency. CA focuses on dedicated monitoring capabilities, whereas Grafana aligns scalable pricing with its diverse functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), Network Monitoring Software (102nd)

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Gregory Diana

Managing Director at Exponential Energy (Pty) Ltd

Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points

In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"It is truly reliable."

"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I use the tool's free license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

From an analytics perspective, the integration of AI would be a beneficial improvement for Grafana Enterprise Stack.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

Our primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack includes monitoring cluster utilization, taking care of impact avoidance, conducting upgrades, ensuring storage memory does not become full, and id...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 38% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 10% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.