CA Unified Communications Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #102, while IBM is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

181 Views
135 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews

1,885 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

```html

CA Unified Communications Monitor and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) compete in the network performance monitoring space. While CA Unified Communications Monitor is valued for affordability and support, IBM SevOne NPM offers superior advanced features, justifying its higher price.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time monitoring tailored for communication networks, efficient alert systems, and strong integration support with unified communication tools. IBM SevOne NPM excels in comprehensive network analytics, automated reporting, and predictive performance capabilities across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve in simplifying its configuration processes, adding enhanced reporting features, and supporting wider network integrations. IBM SevOne NPM might refine its cost structure, expand compatibility with third-party tools, and enhance usability for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM offers a user-friendly deployment process and excellent documentation, paired with responsive customer service for smooth operations. CA Unified Communications Monitor has a more complex setup but is supported by a helpful service team.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is competitively priced, delivering solid ROI for budget-conscious businesses, particularly mid-sized ones. IBM SevOne NPM, despite a higher cost, provides valuable ROI for enterprises needing in-depth network analysis.

```

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

102nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

43rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (18th), Log Management (44th), Cloud Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Grzegorz Nowak

Solution Architect at Wingu

Improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic

We use SevOne to collect and report on network flows SevOne improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic. We can look at bandwidth for specific endpoints on the customer's network and analyze traffic to identify issues. For example, maybe some connectors are unavailable.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"In 90% of the cases, new devices are plug-and-play, so when a new version comes out then SevOne has support for it out of the box."

"One of the most valuable features is the graphs, which you can build instantly. I have used some open-source platforms in the past, but they are not as good. With SevOne, the sampling in the graph can be every few seconds, not just every few minutes, and that's really helpful. It's really fast."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the scale-up and scale-down. The scale-up is an operation where the CPU boosts-up and then the memory will boost-up. That works awesomely."

"We have benefited mainly from the use of the dashboard interface. It makes the network visually interesting for other people who are not in the network. A lot of people are not network techies who understand streams in the network. Based on location, we have streams coming in and out. They can see visually when there is some problem. They don't need to understand all the network technology behind it to be able to understand if everything is working well or if there is a problem."

"Its ability to monitor practically any type of network device via SNMP is most valuable. This is the main functionality that we're using. If a network device exposes a metric, such as interface utilization, SevOne will monitor it for us."

"We find that the reporting is particularly valuable in terms of not only communicating with our peer teams but also with the executives."

"We've had great feedback from our customers about SevOne support. They're willing to set up a remote session upon request. You have to go through three tiers of support with most vendors, and they ask a lot of screening questions before they will do a remote session. You need to spend a lot of time before an engineer will host a remote session to look at your problematic system."

"I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or in-house. We don’t have to carry the data all over the globe. Also, I am impressed with the tool's flow reporting and Wi-Fi."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"Would benefit with the addition of AI modules for proactive data insights."

"We need to be thinking about streaming telemetry protocols. They already have the port for enhanced visualization, which they already have through Data Insight."

"One area that requires a little bit of improvement is the topology of visualization and being able to map out connections, end-to-end. It's able to do that, but it's not as impressive as we would like it to be. We would like to understand the different interface types and the connection points better, through the visualization. Heatmaps also need further development."

"The tool needs improvement in non-Cisco SD-WAN."

"The method of searching for SIP and the way to create the groups."

"With the administrative management of the appliance, if some object appears from SevOne because something changed in the network or whatever, then as an administrator you will not be aware. If you are using this object in a report, this object will disappear from the report and you will not be aware of it. So, if you have 1,000 reports, you cannot always check these reports everyday to see if objects are missing or information has disappeared. We don't have any information on alerts, saying that something is happening there and maybe we need to take action. If an object was replaced by another one, or if a link was replaced by another one, then the graph needs to be changed because it doesn't exist in the graph anymore. However, we don't have this information."

"I would like to see live maps as an added feature. Also, build modules on AI and EML to provide better data insights that would proactively tell us what we should be looking after."

"SevOne could improve its flexibility because it isn't fully customizable and its out-of-the-box configuration doesn't cover all use cases."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing has been fair."

"For the value that you get from SevOne, it's worth the price. There are a lot of cheaper alternatives on the market, and even free options. But they require more staff, more resources, and engineers with more advanced knowledge of monitoring. That's what makes SevOne worth the price."

"The pricing has not evolved with the market, which is one of the reasons we are moving to a new product."

"Prices per license are not huge, but they exist."

"The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing."

"A blocking point is the high upfront cost because it is challenging to get it accepted and the purchase approved."

"There are cheaper solutions available."

"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SevOne Network Data Platform?

I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SevOne Network Data Platform?

The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?

There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

April 2025

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report

Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

SevOne

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...

IBM

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

April 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.