IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

IBM and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. IBM is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Read 53 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews

1,998 Views
1,140 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 49 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

2,528 Views
1,747 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and IBM SevOne NPM compete in the network performance monitoring category. NETSCOUT appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive packet inspection capabilities and detailed traffic analysis.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE provides detailed traffic analysis, dynamic visual dashboards, and real-time communication monitoring. It offers deep packet inspection, which is crucial for extensive network investigation, and highlights dependency mapping for comprehensive visibility. IBM SevOne NPM shines with efficient SNMP data handling, high-frequency polling for real-time insights, and scalability in metrics collection, aiding in robust network performance management.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE could be improved with a more intuitive interface, reduced complexity, and fewer dependencies on physical appliances. IBM SevOne NPM would benefit from enhanced insight capabilities, advanced cloud monitoring features, and better management of high-frequency polling to minimize system impact.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and IBM SevOne NPM are strong in on-premises deployments. NETSCOUT demands more dedicated support, often needing local engineers, while IBM SevOne NPM offers reliable external support, which aids in scalability and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is considered expensive, with cost-effectiveness a concern despite its enhanced troubleshooting capabilities that offer measurable ROI. IBM SevOne NPM provides a scalable pay-as-you-go pricing model, appealing for gradual investment, which reduces troubleshooting times and improves network uptime.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th), Log Management (47th), Cloud Monitoring Software (27th)

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Grzegorz Nowak

Solution Architect at Wingu

Improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic

We use SevOne to collect and report on network flows SevOne improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic. We can look at bandwidth for specific endpoints on the customer's network and analyze traffic to identify issues. For example, maybe some connectors are unavailable.…

Read full review

Ruslan Melnyk

Business Unit Manager at BAKOTECH

Useful for network performance monitoring

My manager can explain the use cases attached to the product. I am a unit leader in my company, and I don't sell the product directly to our partners or customers. In my company, I manage certain processes and a team while building, developing, and providing them with a direction for the market. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a good solution for network performance monitoring since it is not cloud-based. My company sells NETSCOUT nGeniusONE in eight to ten countries. I think the solution is not good for capacity planning, but it is better to help find problems in applications because not every infrastructure is good at managing working applications. I think it is a solution meant for applications. The tool is useful for solving problems attached to applications. The tool's real-time network monitoring capability was used when the product was more reactive. In our company, if we use real-time monitoring, then we need to deal with raw traffic. In our company, if we don't see any problem in the real-time systems, we have the possibility to rely on the tool since it acts like a time machine for us, which can allow us to get back to the areas of problem and solve them. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. For many users, it can be a good monitoring system that can be scaled up in the future. I think it is a good product to start with when working systems in an environment. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is another tool used to manage raw traffic, and I find it to integrate well into our customers' network. I am not using it actively on the system. I use the tool for network packet brokers. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability. I have never had to worry about how to handle really big environments."

"SevOne has rich API capabilities, giving us the flexibility to control what we collect and customize the collection, creation, and manipulation of now metrics as necessary."

"I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or in-house. We don’t have to carry the data all over the globe. Also, I am impressed with the tool's flow reporting and Wi-Fi."

"In 90% of the cases, new devices are plug-and-play, so when a new version comes out then SevOne has support for it out of the box."

"We have benefited mainly from the use of the dashboard interface. It makes the network visually interesting for other people who are not in the network. A lot of people are not network techies who understand streams in the network. Based on location, we have streams coming in and out. They can see visually when there is some problem. They don't need to understand all the network technology behind it to be able to understand if everything is working well or if there is a problem."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the scale-up and scale-down. The scale-up is an operation where the CPU boosts-up and then the memory will boost-up. That works awesomely."

"The monitoring of the network is very customizable. That is its unique feature."

"I like SevOne's network flow reporting."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros

"The valuable features include packet analysis, packet capture, and [that] it's easy to use."

"The solution helps us get to root cause quickly by using the Media Monitor to help identify QoS mismatches for voice calls on the network."

"Valuable features include data threat detection, network analytics, and overall bandwidth monitoring."

"The stability of this product is ok."

"When we have any type of outage, and we dig into it, we are able to tell what the root cause is instead of having to go through Wireshark, etc."

"It's a consolidated, single tool that talks to multiple platforms. It's not vendor-proprietary; it's independent. It provides interoperability with different products, whether they are routing products, switching products, wireless, wired, load balancing, or proxy. It works with anything you can name."

"It is a scalable product."

"The system's ability to prevent downtime represents a significant return on investment, but I do not have specific numerical data."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

Cons

"In terms of having a complete view of our network performance, I would rate it a nine out of 10. The reason for not giving it a 10 is that there is no packet capture associated with SevOne, but we do have other tools in place to do that."

"User-friendly, multi-tenancy."

"We previously have had discussions on some reporting enhancements. So, we raised a feature request, which was delivered from SevOne."

"There are a lot of pain points. My main problem is that we don't have a high availability system. There are 20 peers. We're going to lose the end-of-life appliances that are old. If we lose a peer and it doesn't come back, we lose all that data. The reason we don't have high availability is because it's double the charge."

"The method of searching for SIP and the way to create the groups."

"Telemetry is hot these days, and IBM can improve SevOne's support for telemetry correction. Reporting is another feature that could be better. It provides the bare minimum functionality, which is good enough for most engineers, but the management isn't advanced. The new portal provides a much lighter view and better visualization, but the management is not so good."

"The reports are easy to configure but they are a bit outdated in terms of appearance and visualization."

"High-frequency polling is data-intensive because you're pulling more. If SevOne could figure out a way to manage the impact of high-frequency polling on the system, that would be very popular."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons

"I would love to have them reassemble fragmented packets. That would be a very big plus in my book."

"On a network the size of ours, the loading times seem a little extensive, 20 or 30 seconds to load up some graphs."

"One of the products we use is SolarWinds, and it provides a very cool mapping of an agent from end-to-end. If NETSCOUT could somehow implement that into their design... make it quicker and easier to get those net paths, it would be huge."

"The technical support could improve a bit with quicker responses for early on questions. What I think are simple questions are taking a long time to get answers to."

"I would recommend enhancing the APM capabilities."

"The solution is not easy to install."

"Another thing that would help out is if they packaged the NetFlow monitor into nGeniusONE. Their NetFlow monitor works with nGeniusONE where you can actually get the netflow of pretty much anything you hook it up to. But it's a separate box that you have to buy. If there was a way that could package that into nGeniusONE, it would be a complete package straight out of the box."

"Some of the filters could be easier to see and to set up. That's the only thing that I've ever had any trouble with."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."

"Many tools price things based on the number of KPIs that you're collecting around a device. In many cases, there could be hundreds of metrics that you need to collect. SevOne provides device-level pricing. That gives us the flexibility to turn on, and expand on, the metrics that we're collecting around those devices, without taking a financial hit."

"The pricing has not evolved with the market, which is one of the reasons we are moving to a new product."

"It is inexpensive compared to other monitoring tools."

"Prices per license are not huge, but they exist."

"There are different options available for licensing, with the per-device option being more expensive but more flexible."

"Although I don't have exact details in terms of cost, my experience has been that SevOne is willing to make a deal with the customer."

"The pricing has been fair."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice

"It is a little overall pricey and expensive, but you get what you pay for."

"This solution has saved us more than $50,000 a month and freed up 30 percent of our bandwidth."

"Cost is probably the biggest drawback. Compared to some of the newer vendors that have popped up in the space, it's definitely more on the expensive side... [But] it's been able to keep its value, even in the face of the cheaper competition."

"The price is only for acquisition; it's not a licence."

"The scalability becomes very expensive quickly."

"Make sure you get the low down on your licensing and understand the licensing requirements before making a purchase, especially when it comes to an upgrade. Make sure that it suits your needs before you commit to it. For example, we purchased ATA at version 6.2.1. At that time, the licensing covered everything we need. NETSCOUT comes out with 6.2.2, stating that in order to upgrade, you had to purchase CyberStream licensing. Now that requires some additional funding from both a capital investment and a maintenance cost. That's something that should have been said, "Well, if you want these additional features, you will need to purchase these CyberStreams." Otherwise, we should be allowed to continue on the basic operations as it is now through the newer releases without being stuck."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product may come across as a cheap tool for some, while it may seem costly for others."

"We have a premium customized contract for the solution."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SevOne Network Data Platform?

I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SevOne Network Data Platform?

The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?

SevOne could improve its flexibility because it isn't fully customizable and its out-of-the-box configuration doesn't cover all use cases.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

The pricing is a bit high yet not overly expensive. The cost depends on the size of the customer, as sizing controls the pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 14% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 6% of the time

NetBrain vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 4% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

February 2025

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report

Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

February 2025

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Also Known As

SevOne

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

Overview

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...

IBM

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)

Cerner Corporation

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2025

Free Report: IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.