Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Sophos are both solutions in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Sophos is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 96% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Check Point CloudGuard Network Security are competitors in the network security category. Check Point CloudGuard seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat prevention and better suitability for cloud environments.

Features: Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers comprehensive network security with identity-based features, antivirus, and web filtering. It supports VPN and integrates well with Active Directory. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security provides advanced threat prevention, integrates with various cloud platforms, and offers auto-scaling capabilities, making it suitable for dynamic cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Sophos Cyberoam UTM has performance issues under high traffic and scalability limitations, with concerns about VPN features and product lifecycle. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security users report challenges with complex deployment and version upgrades, requesting better technical documentation and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Cyberoam UTM is generally praised for its on-premises deployment and reliable technical support, despite occasional concerns about response times post-acquisition. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security, while robust, struggles with deployment complexity but has mostly positive customer feedback, although technical support response times can be slow.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Cyberoam UTM is competitively priced though license costs can be high. It is viewed as cost-effective for small businesses with good ROI. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is regarded as expensive despite its flexible licensing model; however, users find the investment worthwhile for its enhanced security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate

Featured Reviews

DineshKumar28

Senior Manager at Cognizant

Sep 25, 2024

Effective threat prevention with responsive customer support

We are using Fortinet FortiGate as a firewall Fortinet FortiGate has been invaluable. It has helped save costs due to its various features, reliable performance, very good UI, low latency, and stability. The Threat Intel engine in Fortinet FortiGate is highly rated for its effectiveness in…

Read full review

PRASHANT GARJE

Manager - Enterprise Architecture and Cloud at Axis Bank

May 22, 2024

Cost-effective, supports automation, and provides good security

We have done a lot of automation with the firewall, but sometimes, there are some failures because of some bugs. The fixes for them are still not available. We have daily or weekly communication with the Check Point people giving support in the India region, but we have not seen much improvement or response to our requests for some additional features. We are moving to infra as a code, so we are expecting more advancements in this product. Just installing the patches is not going to help us. They need to focus on this area. I expect Check Point CloudGuard to come up with some AI/ML integration. A firewall is the first L3 security device available to you. It is the single point that manages or processes the traffic for an organization. There is a possibility that the device goes down or gets rebooted for any reason. The integration of artificial intelligence with the devices can help us to know in advance that there might be a surge in traffic. There might be a spike in the traffic, so we can have some additional firewalls integrated. This predictive analysis has to be there. This way, if required, a second, third, or fourth firewall can come into the picture. All the firewalls will process the traffic simultaneously. I am expecting such capability. This sort of feature is available with AWS. We are deploying all the firewalls on AWS, but it would be easy if, in the future, such a feature is available from the OEM or Check Point itself. It will be very helpful for the organization. We have had a couple of outages because of some misconfiguration. They were human errors but there were no prior indications that if we were making these sorts of changes, this would happen. People making the changes on the firewall were not aware of this, and that is the reason why the outage happened. In a financial organization, an outage of even five minutes can cost a lot.

Read full review

Kiarash Heydari

Information security manager at asa com

Jan 26, 2023

Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy

Sophos Cyberoam UTM has room for improvement in specific rules-based objects and redesign. The solution also needs to improve in adding rules and policies, including renewing and finding policies. The Sophos team should make Sophos Cyberoam UTM policies and rules better and more useful than the old ones because that can be difficult and confusing sometimes. For example, adding policies or rules can be confusing, and that can be risky. To improve Sophos Cyberoam UTM, Sophos should add an IPS or IDS signature feature in the current plans offered to customers. Upgrading or patching the solution can be slow, so that's another area for improvement. In the next version of Sophos Cyberoam UTM, I want it to have an appliance management feature, similar to what's in FortiManager, where you can connect all appliances and manage the devices because that would be easier in terms of reporting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good source for firewall protection."

"The most valuable features are that it is very simple to configure and to manage."

"The wireless control is helpful."

"Mainly the FortiGate reporting system is very good. It guides us through all the expectations of security. Fortinet provides us all that we need for security. Also, Fortinet FortiGate is a next-generation firewall. It is much more advanced than others."

"It's quite comfortable to handle the FortiGate firewall."

"Fortinet FortiGate is user-friendly and affordable."

"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate is the simple configuration."

"With FortiClient, you can easily connect when you are home, check out what you want to do, and connect to your network when you are not at work. You can switch on servers and you can check what is wrong."

More Fortinet FortiGate pros

"The solution could improve to have a DLP feature."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring. We can easily monitor what kind of stuff comes over to our network and we can then check the dashboard and work accordingly."

"Check Point CloudGuard is quick to deploy and easy for the customer to use."

"The most valuable features are the VPN Blade, IPS Blade, the URL filtering, and the Applications Control Blade."

"Workflows across the company ecosystem have can flow smoothly without experiencing any challenges."

"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the ease of use. It was not difficult to learn."

"The versatility is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The query feature is going to be a game-changer for us as we move forward."

More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security pros

"The solution's interface is user-friendly, and the web protection is good. The tool is highly stable. The product is scalable. The technical support is good. We chose Sophos Cyberoam UTM because their focus on security research is higher compared to other brands. It's an all-in-one solution with antivirus, EDR, wireless protection, and web protection integrated into one box. The initial setup was straightforward."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The product is a simple and user-friendly UTM that can handle accounting, reporting, firewall, IPS, and antivirus for industries."

"In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features."

"Good user interface."

"I'm more inclined towards the conventional firewall. So for me, I'm more geared towards the standard firewall type functionalities as well as the web application firewall because that seems to work fine."

"I believe it's the advanced security software that offers SMPP protection for the agent."

"I like Sophos Cyberoam UTM as a security component or device for organizations. Performance-wise, it's a satisfactory solution, and it works okay. It also has good features."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM pros

Cons

"It's my understanding that more of the current generation features could be brought in. There could be more integration with EDRs, for example."

"Some of the software stability could improve."

"In the balance between links feature normally you can just choose one option to balance. It would be better for the solution to have more than one option, preferably three."

"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having a frequent ask questions(FAQ) area for people to receive quick answers to popular questions. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have an SMS notification feature. For example, if you cannot access your email you could receive an SMS message."

"The cloud features and integration could be improved."

"Fortinet FortiGate needs to improve the protection, it did not prevent us from being attacked. Additionally, Fortinet FortiGate could provide more features for WAF devices. I should not have to purchase two solutions, it would be a benefit to combine these features into one solution."

"It should be more stable. There should be full integration within Fortinet products themselves as well as with other third-party products. Especially when you're not dealing with SIEM and the correlation of the security box, we want Fortinet to be able to share that information with as many other products as it can."

"Fortinet FortiGate could improve if it had a cloud-managed solution."

More Fortinet FortiGate cons

"With the incorporation of a lot of AI and machine learning, they can build some sort of a matrix for low-level threats or low-level things that require attention. There can be automation of those tasks so that we don't have to take more time and effort. There should be machine learning to eliminate level-one types of tasks."

"Check Point CloudGuard is not a feature-centric product because Check Point concentrates on security."

"There is room for improvement in addressing bugs and support issues."

"The cost is relatively high compared to the cost of other products in the market."

"Check Point Virtual Systems is a complete solution, but pricing can be better."

"Every good security product requires a company with many research departments and staff."

"We are at the place where we are looking at better integration with the management system. We use an MDS today, and it is self-deployed. We want to get to the Smart-1 Cloud, but we do not know what that looks like today because it does not support a multi-domain setup. Smart-1 should either be able to do multi-domain or there should be some form of taking a multi-domain environment and putting it in Smart-1."

"The user interface can be improved."

More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security cons

"When it comes to web filtering and application filtering, it does not contain enough signatures to determine all of the sites that need to be blocked."

"We use different workarounds and find different solutions for it, depending on the client's needs. We shouldn't have to, we should just be able to use the product as it comes with Cyberoam, rather than having to revert to other products."

"The product strategy of the manufacturer is strange. I don't understand what they are doing in that regard."

"In my experience the solution can be easier to configure with more documentation, we need more training."

"It is not a scalable product. This is because if you want to increase the capacity of the solution, then you have to change the device."

"The solution had a feature to import users from a CSV file. However, the latest version does not have that option."

"The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features."

"The configuration requires an expert to be set up, so it could be made simpler."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on the FortiGate model we are using, ranging from $3,000 to $20,000 US dollars."

"The price of Fortinet FortiGate when compared to other solutions is high. However, my knowledge of the price is from third parties and I am not sure how accurate it is. I typically work in the technical area of my organization."

"It was worth the money overall. It's good value."

"The price range is quite acceptable and normal."

"The price of FortiGate is comparable to that of most other firewall solutions and is more affordable than Cisco."

"I give the pricing a nine out of ten."

"Here in Brazil, we're going through difficult economic times and the tax on the dollar is high. All the solutions from minor competitors are growing in the market. The prices have come more competitive."

"The main reason we chose Fortinet FortiGate was that the price was better than the competition."

More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice

"The pricing and licensing have been good. We just had to do a license increase for our portion of it. We had that done within a couple of days. Given the fact that it's purely a software-based license, it ends up being even quicker than doing it for an on-prem firewall."

"We explored both pay-as-you-go and build-your-own-licensing models, and found both to be competitive."

"Pricing of CloudGuard is pretty fair when you have a single account. It's comparable with other cloud providers. But for our use case, it got really pricey when we had to deploy multiple CloudGuards on multiple accounts in different regions, because you can't have CloudGuard protecting multiple regions. That's the big thing."

"The licesning has some good features. For example, the scaling feature is free of charge, allowing multiple scale-ups and scale-downs over a two-week period, which is pretty good."

"It is not expensive."

"The product is too expensive."

"When customers compare it with Sophos or any other products, the price is on the higher side."

"The licensing model has since transitioned to a cluster-based variant."

More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security pricing and cost advice

"We just use the standard package."

"Cost-wise, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a good solution. Customers don't collapse upon hearing the price for it. My company pays for the license of Sophos Cyberoam UTM annually."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the least expensive, I rate the solution a five."

"The product's pricing is a challenge."

"The product has a very low price compared to other solutions."

"It is not cheap."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is high."

"Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a cost-efficient solution compared to other solutions."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

27%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Media Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?

When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage a...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?

From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know...

See all answers

What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?

As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

The tool's most valuable feature is its management console.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

CloudGuard is pretty expensive. Azure ends up being cheaper. They are fairly priced. It's not cheap. However, you def...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

The solution's future releases would benefit from incorporating more advanced machine learning capabilities for real-...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

The solution works perfectly without any users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

The solution has a reasonable price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Cyberoam UTM?

They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos XG vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 22% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 12% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 5% of the time

Meraki MX vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors

Azure Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Compared 14% of the time

VMware NSX vs Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Competitors

Netgate pfSense vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 14% of the time

OPNsense vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 12% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 9% of the time

SonicWall NSa vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Compared 8% of the time

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate

November 2024

Download Fortinet FortiGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

November 2024

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security report

Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Cyberoam UTM

October 2024

Download Sophos Cyberoam UTM product report

Also Known As

FortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGate

CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point vSEC, CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point Virtual Systems, Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

No data available

Learn More

Fortinet

Check Point Software Technologies

Sophos

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate enhances network security, prevents unauthorized access, and offers robust firewall protection. Valued features include advanced threat protection, reliable performance, and a user-friendly interface. It improves efficiency, streamlines processes, and boosts collaboration, providing valuable insights for informed decision-making and growth.

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is designed to secure cloud assets, offering robust firewall capabilities and protection for both internal and external traffic across AWS, Azure, and on-premises environments.

Enterprises rely on Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for comprehensive network protection, threat prevention, and compliance enforcement. Supporting virtual machines and hybrid environments, it delivers advanced security measures including intrusion prevention and application control. Key functions include firewall security, network segmentation, and cloud environment protection, ensuring businesses maintain a secure and compliant IT infrastructure.

What are the most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

Flexible Architecture: Adaptable to diverse cloud and on-premises environments.
UTM Capabilities: Unified Threat Management delivering multi-layered security.
Advanced Threat Prevention: Includes IPS, application control, and anti-malware.
Auto-scaling: Automatically adjusts capacity based on traffic and demand.
Comprehensive Threat Prevention: Protects against known and unknown threats.
Ease of Use: Streamlined deployment and management processes.
Integration with Cloud Platforms: Seamlessly works with AWS, Azure, and other clouds.
Centralized Management: Single-pane-of-glass visibility and control.
User Identity Awareness: Enhances security policies based on user identities.
Zero-touch Deployment: Simplifies initial setup and deployment.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

Email Protection: Shields email communications from threats.
Anti-malware: Guards against malicious software.
Single-pane-of-glass Visibility: Provides a unified view for better security management.
Scalability: Grows with the business needs.
Seamless Cloud Transition: Eases the move from on-premises to cloud environments.

In industries such as financial services, healthcare, retail, and education, Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is implemented to safeguard sensitive data, ensure compliance, and protect critical infrastructure. Companies in these sectors benefit from its advanced threat prevention and flexible deployment options, meeting their stringent security requirements while enabling secure digital transformation.

Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya

Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, Helvetica Insurance

Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM

October 2024

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM report.

See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.