Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx One comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Checkmarx are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Checkmarx’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 34 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

323 Views
115 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

27,270 Views
17,669 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Check Point CloudGuard WAF compete in the security solutions segment. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have a slight edge due to its comprehensive feature set, though Checkmarx One stands out for its user experience and support.

Features: Checkmarx One offers seamless integration, detailed code analysis, and a user-friendly interface for enhancing security processes. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced threat prevention, real-time traffic analysis, and strong protection through extensive monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve vulnerability reporting accuracy, increase feature set depth, and enhance scalability for larger enterprises. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek better flexibility in configuration settings, enhanced reporting detail, and optimization of resource usage to meet growing demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is favored for straightforward deployment and responsive support, easing adoption. Check Point CloudGuard WAF's deployment is more complex, but users benefit from robust customer service, although it may require more technical expertise at setup.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is seen as cost-effective with lower setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious users and providing a satisfactory ROI. Check Point CloudGuard WAF has higher initial costs, but its extensive features justify the expense for many users who prioritize a long-term ROI despite the upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.9%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay

Founder at BlockMosiac

Mar 18, 2024

Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability

There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.

Read full review

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Feb 19, 2024

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis. Checkmarx dynamics code analysis improved our software security posture by showcasing vulnerabilities within the code and identifying or providing recommendations on how to improve The solution's user interface…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."

"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."

"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."

"The most valuable feature we have found in Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its rich logging capabilities."

"One of the best features of CloudGuard WAF is its user-friendly GUI dashboard."

"It offers high performance and improved productivity for users."

"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."

"It is a very scalable and stable solution."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are its integration with multiple SCM solutions and CICD tools, its ability to scale according to user licenses, and the quick scanning process."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile. If the code has dependencies or build errors, the scan fails. With Checkmarx, pre-compile scanning is seamless. This allows us to scan more code."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

More Checkmarx One pros

Cons

"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."

"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."

"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."

"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."

"CloudGuard could improve in areas such as ease of integration with Fortinet and reducing costs associated with deployment in cloud environments like Azure."

"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"I can't create a business case with multiple-factor authentication."

More Checkmarx One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not that expensive considering what it offers."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"It is reasonable as compared to the other solutions."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Security Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability. Although they provide 24/7 support, there are sometimes delays in delivering solutions. Advanced bot protection has recently been i...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 18% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 15% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 49% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

November 2024

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

November 2024

Download Checkmarx One product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Check Point Software Technologies

Checkmarx

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF (Web Application Firewall) is a cloud-native security solution designed to protect web applications and APIs from known and unknown threats. It employs contextual AI and machine learning to prevent zero-day attacks without relying on traditional signature-based detection methods, ensuring that applications remain secure even as new threats emerge.

CloudGuard WAF offers preemptive protection against vulnerabilities by using machine learning to identify and block zero-day threats like Log4Shell and Spring4Shell. It provides precise detection capabilities, minimizing the need for constant fine-tuning and reducing false positives. Designed for cloud-native environments, CloudGuard WAF integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, supporting automated deployment and configuration through infrastructure as code (IaC) or APIs.

Key Features of CloudGuard WAF:

ML-Based Threat Prevention: Stops application-layer attacks, including those listed in the OWASP Top 10, with minimal tuning and no reliance on signature updates.
API Discovery and Security: Identifies and secures APIs, preventing misuse and enforcing API schemas to protect against unauthorized access.
Bot and DDoS Prevention: Detects and mitigates automated attacks that can disrupt services or degrade customer experiences.
Intrusion Prevention (IPS): Provides protection against over 2,800 web-related CVEs using Check Point’s award-winning IPS technology.

Benefits of CloudGuard WAF:

Zero-Day Protection: Mitigates risks from newly discovered vulnerabilities without waiting for signature updates.
Reduced Operational Overhead: Eliminates the need for constant manual tuning and exception handling, simplifying security management.
Comprehensive API Security: Enhances control over your attack surface by discovering and securing all APIs, including shadow, rogue, and deprecated endpoints.
Fast and Easy Deployment: Deployable within minutes via WAF as a Service (WAFaaS), requiring only a one-time DNS configuration for immediate protection.

CloudGuard WAF is particularly suitable for organizations using modern, cloud-based architectures that require robust, automated security measures for both applications and APIs. Its capabilities are valuable for industries that handle sensitive data, such as finance or healthcare, where compliance and data protection are critical. Pricing and support are typically customized to the specific needs and scale of the deployment, with options for continuous updates and maintenance through Check Point's managed services.

CloudGuard WAF by Check Point provides advanced, AI-driven protection for web applications and APIs, offering automated, precise threat prevention and easy integration with cloud-native environments, ensuring robust security without the need for extensive manual configuration.

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

October 2024

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.