Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Customer service for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is mixed, with both praise for effectiveness and criticism of response times.
Sentiment score
7.4
Checkmarx One's support is generally rated positively for knowledgeability and quick responses, despite occasional delays and unresolved issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost efficiency, improved support, better integration, enhanced UI, and extended trial for effective evaluation.
Sentiment score
4.7
Checkmarx One needs better accuracy, language support, integration, flexibility, UI customization, documentation, dynamic testing, and API security features.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers excellent scalability and seamless integration, though potential latency issues arise with larger user bases.
Sentiment score
7.3
Checkmarx One is favored for its scalability and efficiency, though licensing and resource challenges are sometimes noted.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.7
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is competitively priced with advanced features, but costs more than alternatives like FortiWeb and Azure WAF.
Sentiment score
6.4
Checkmarx One is costly but valued for its robust security, despite complexity in setup and licensing options.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is praised for stability and reliability, despite minor issues like license downtime and configuration challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Checkmarx One is stable for most, but large codebase handling can cause crashes, memory issues, and configuration dependence.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides scalable, high-performance security with automated threat detection, real-time monitoring, and seamless cloud integration.
Sentiment score
8.4
Checkmarx One enhances secure coding with user-friendly interface, automation, and multi-language support, making it ideal for developers.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Application Security Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability
There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Security Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability. Although they provide 24/7 support, there are sometimes delays in delivering solutions. Advanced bot protection has recently been i...
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.