Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point CloudGuard WAF users experienced strong ROI through enhanced security, efficiency, reduced costs, and tool consolidation benefits.
Sentiment score
7.5
Checkmarx One enhances security, speeds delivery, reduces costs, and returns ROI within six months for some users.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point CloudGuard WAF support has mixed reviews, praised for expertise but criticized for slow response and limited availability.
Sentiment score
7.1
Checkmarx One provides generally positive support, but response delays and unresolved tickets challenge some users, despite skilled assistance.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
The customer service is very good.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly scalable, flexible in licensing, and praised for adaptable performance in diverse environments.
Sentiment score
7.1
Checkmarx One offers strong scalability, supports automation, and manages scan engines, though may face processing time and licensing cost constraints.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is stable, reliable, highly rated by users, with quick support resolution and minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.1
Checkmarx One is generally stable, but users report occasional crashes and performance issues, varying stability ratings from 4-10.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
We run some of the agents on our data centers and never had any issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost efficiency, extended trial, improved support, better UI, threat detection, and IPv6 integration.
Checkmarx One requires enhancements in false positive reduction, language support, pricing, role management, UI, and support response time.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Perhaps something between CloudGuard management and the virtual appliance on-site could be faster.
I cannot see many logs for our application that are posted under CloudGuard WAF, and sometimes I cannot identify the issues I have with CloudGuard.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced features and support but is seen as expensive by some smaller organizations.
Checkmarx One's pricing is costly but justified by its flexibility, competitive pricing, and enhanced security for enterprises.
Small organizations might not be able to afford the price.
The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past.
It is a really good price considering the functionalities of the product and the price of the license.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers scalable security, advanced threat detection, regulatory compliance support, and ease of use with customizable features.
Checkmarx One offers advanced code analysis, seamless repository integration, and user-friendly features for efficient security testing and vulnerability management.
With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side.
It reduced our false positive rate significantly - by 90%.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Application Security Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 11.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate
CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Security Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support. The price is fair for the features offered. For us, it is cost-effective compar...
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation. The ...
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.