Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.3
Check Point CloudGuard WAF increased ROI by enhancing security, reducing costs, and improving productivity and efficiency for many companies.
Sentiment score
7.5
Checkmarx One enhances security, speeds delivery, reduces costs, and returns ROI within six months for some users.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Check Point CloudGuard WAF support is praised for expertise but criticized for delays and unresolved licensing issues.
Sentiment score
7.0
Checkmarx One provides generally positive support, but response delays and unresolved tickets challenge some users, despite skilled assistance.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's cloud-based, AI-driven design ensures effective scalability, adaptable licensing, and high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
7.1
Checkmarx One offers strong scalability, supports automation, and manages scan engines, though may face processing time and licensing cost constraints.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly praised for stability and reliability, though some users report minor licensing-related downtimes.
Sentiment score
7.2
Checkmarx One is generally stable, but users report occasional crashes and performance issues, varying stability ratings from 4-10.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost reduction, better customization, improved support, and streamlined configuration for enhanced user experience.
Checkmarx One requires enhancements in false positive reduction, language support, pricing, role management, UI, and support response time.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers premium-priced security with flexible licensing, justified by advanced features and strong performance.
Checkmarx One's pricing is costly but justified by its flexibility, competitive pricing, and enhanced security for enterprises.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides scalable security, seamless integration, and AI-driven features with low false positives and real-time threat analysis.
Checkmarx One offers advanced code analysis, seamless repository integration, and user-friendly features for efficient security testing and vulnerability management.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Application Security Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.1%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability
There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Security Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability. Although they provide 24/7 support, there are sometimes delays in delivering solutions. Advanced bot protection has recently been i...
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.