Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Customer service for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is mixed, with both praise for effectiveness and criticism of response times.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost efficiency, improved support, better integration, enhanced UI, and extended trial for effective evaluation.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers excellent scalability and seamless integration, though potential latency issues arise with larger user bases.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.7
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is competitively priced with advanced features, but costs more than alternatives like FortiWeb and Azure WAF.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is praised for stability and reliability, despite minor issues like license downtime and configuration challenges.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides scalable, high-performance security with automated threat detection, real-time monitoring, and seamless cloud integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th)
Microsoft Azure Application...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
2nd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability
There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.
Sami - PeerSpot reviewer
High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure
The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly. There isn't a standardized process for blocking IPs. IPs need to be blocked individually, whether one or one hundred. A normal scenario would be to copy and paste multiple IPs at the same time but the solution does not offer this option. Updating takes a long time and is up to the WAF. In most cases, we prepare scripts to handle these updates.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Security Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability. Although they provide 24/7 support, there are sometimes delays in delivering solutions. Advanced bot protection has recently been i...
What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.