Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and F5 are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.9, while F5 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to F5’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

F5 Advanced WAF and Check Point CloudGuard WAF compete in the web application firewall market. While F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive features, its higher cost may deter smaller enterprises, making Check Point CloudGuard a more cost-effective option with easy integration for cloud environments.

Features: F5 Advanced WAF provides anti-bot protection, DDoS mitigation, and IP intelligence, which contribute to its robust security framework ideal for enterprise-level deployments. Check Point CloudGuard WAF focuses on API security, intrusion prevention, and AI-enhanced threat detection, making it suitable for cloud-native environments and known for its seamless API integration.

Room for Improvement: F5 Advanced WAF could improve in user interface design and report generation for better user experience and integration. The complexity of setup and pricing is also challenging for users. Check Point CloudGuard users have noted lag in administrative interfaces and insufficient documentation, suggesting areas for streamlined support and improved user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 Advanced WAF is commonly used in on-premises and hybrid environments but can be complex without expertise. While the technical support is sound, some users experience delays. Check Point CloudGuard is preferred for cloud environments, praised for easy deployment and robust API integration, though support times can vary.

Pricing and ROI: The higher pricing of F5 Advanced WAF limits accessibility for smaller companies, though its comprehensive security features deliver a high ROI for those who can afford it. Check Point CloudGuard offers more competitive pricing, appealing to a broader range of budgets, and provides good ROI through integration with existing cloud infrastructure at a fraction of the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,824 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

Cloudflare WAF offers quick ROI, crucial protection for e-commerce, saves bandwidth, and balances cost with valuable free features.

Sentiment score

6.4

Check Point CloudGuard WAF users report 70-90% ROI, citing improved security, cost efficiency, and enhanced organizational operations.

Sentiment score

7.6

F5 Advanced WAF boosts ROI by enhancing security, reducing overhead, and protecting assets in sectors like finance and banking.

My experience with the pricing or licensing of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is that many features can be accessed for free, so the pricing is definitely reasonable.

Herb Angle

Owner at Hga consulting

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Time savings in daily operations come from the automatic learning and signature update reducing the need for constant manual rule management, allowing the security and network teams to spend significantly less time handling false positive application-related escalations.

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

Subscription models offer clearer ROI due to a more competitive pricing scheme.

reviewer2641242

Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The amount of attacks it protects against is immense, more than F5 Advanced WAF itself costs.

Kkc Casey

Security Solutions Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

Cloudflare WAF support is mixed; responsive for some, but Indian customers face call availability and administrative issues.

Sentiment score

6.2

Mixed feedback on Check Point CloudGuard WAF support highlights efficiency and knowledge but suggests improvements in responsiveness and weekend coverage.

Sentiment score

6.9

F5 Advanced WAF's support is professional and helpful, though response times vary based on service level and issue priority.

I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to contact them.

Herb Angle

Owner at Hga consulting

The technical support of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between five and seven at maximum.

Avinash Udawant

IT Manager at Amla Commerce

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Both response time and availability need to be improved.

Pawan Thakur

Project Manager at IBM

If there is a bug, the support is usually understanding and resolves issues.

RoiNahari

CEO at CyberApp

I have interacted with F5's support, and while I have no major complaints, they could improve.

reviewer2641242

Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers impressive scalability and automated management, but additional features may incur costs for smaller organizations.

Sentiment score

7.1

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers excellent scalability and adaptability, ideal for diverse workloads across multi-cloud environments.

Sentiment score

7.5

F5 Advanced WAF is adaptable, scalable, and supports diverse business needs with robust load balancing and cloud capabilities.

The scalability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between 8 to 9, as it depends upon the use cases and what exactly the client needs.

Avinash Udawant

IT Manager at Amla Commerce

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

I can run it in HA mode or even divide the traffic volume to the number of instances that I have based on their resource sizing.

Kkc Casey

Security Solutions Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is praised for stability, high performance, effective protection, daily use, and minimal downtime.

Sentiment score

8.0

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly stable, dependable, with minimal disruptions, ensuring consistent operations and enhanced user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

8.4

F5 Advanced WAF is praised for its stability and reliability, handling substantial workloads effectively with minimal bugs.

The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10.

Avinash Udawant

IT Manager at Amla Commerce

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

F5 Advanced WAF has been very reliable and consistent for us; in our on-premise enterprise setup, it has been stable and predictable in day-to-day operations without any unexpected crashes or WAF-related downtime in production.

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

F5 Advanced WAF is pretty stable.

Kkc Casey

Security Solutions Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Room For Improvement

Cloudflare WAF needs feature enhancements, better usability, improved support, advanced DDoS protection, and solutions for latency and alerts.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs better cost efficiency, usability, support, configurations, AI security, reporting, integration, and language options.

F5 Advanced WAF needs a user-friendly interface, better integration, competitive pricing, and improved automation, scalability, and documentation.

The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available.

reviewer2012637

Network Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

I think they're doing a good job with DNS and as support for any domains that I create or that my clients create, it's mandatory for me to ensure they have Cloudflare as their DNS provider.

Herb Angle

Owner at Hga consulting

And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network.

Dean Barisic

CTO at PlayNirvana

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Deployment training for F5 Advanced WAF is lacking and restricts growth by being inaccessible and costly for partners.

reviewer2641242

Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Overall, these are not blockers, merely enhancement opportunities, and once tuned, F5 Advanced WAF is very stable and reliable; improving usability, reporting, and onboarding would make it even more effective for larger environments.

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

There is excellent clarity in the LTM and the WAF.

Pawan Thakur

Project Manager at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Setup Cost

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers affordable, flexible pricing with no upfront costs, noted for competitiveness and included support services.

CloudGuard WAF pricing is competitive with advanced features, though licensing can be complex; many find it worthwhile.

F5 Advanced WAF's high cost is justified by its robust features, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive protection.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Licensing is capacity-driven, so you need careful planning based on traffic volume and use cases, and adding features such as Bot Protection impacts costs; once licensing is clear and sized correctly, there are no surprises.

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

Subscription models have competitive pricing, while perpetual licenses involve an upfront higher cost.

reviewer2641242

Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The price is affordable and satisfactory.

RoiNahari

CEO at CyberApp

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Valuable Features

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall provides comprehensive security features, easy setup, scalability, and competitive pricing with praised performance and stability.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers scalable, AI-driven security with efficient integration, monitoring, and automated management for diverse IT environments.

F5 Advanced WAF excels in detection, customization, and reporting, providing comprehensive web application security and user-friendly operation.

The custom rules and the geo-redundant geographical rule feature, which allows me to implement geographical rules for customers, add significant value.

reviewer2012637

Network Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The best features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall are multiple, including the WAF, rate limiter, and bot attack protection.

Avinash Udawant

IT Manager at Amla Commerce

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools add a layer that we're able to visualize and see before it actually hits the local firewall.

Herb Angle

Owner at Hga consulting

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Amministratore Della Sicurezza Di Rete at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

The Advanced Attack Signature database is very strong and regularly updated, effectively blocking SQL injections, cross-site scripting, command injections, and file inclusion attacks while allowing selective enabling or disabling of signatures to avoid blocking genuine traffic.

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

The perpetual license, despite an initial higher cost, lacks transparency regarding support expiration.

reviewer2641242

Global Channel Alliances Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It contains the logic of both negative and positive security combined.

RoiNahari

CEO at CyberApp

For more quotes and insights, download the F5 Advanced WAF report

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is 5.4%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 2.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 7.1%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 Advanced WAF	7.1%
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall	5.4%
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	2.6%
Other	84.9%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Dean Barisic

CTO at PlayNirvana

Advanced security reporting has protected high-traffic betting platforms from constant attacks

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we have a dedicated IT team for that, and I'm not involved with Cloudflare much anymore. But if I were to compare them to F5, I would like to see more features that F5 offers. F5 has an option to bring the whole infrastructure, the whole WAF and all their packages, Bot Management, and everything else on your infrastructure. You need to install certain services from their side, and then you can choose if you would like requests to hit your servers immediately or if requests need to be proxied through F5 backbone. That would be a nice addition because we have 90% of the traffic as legit traffic coming from whitelisted servers. If it comes from whitelisted servers, I don't need to go every request through the backbone; I could easily just IP whitelist everything. Then I could maybe have Bot Management on my infrastructure that drastically reduces the price of Cloudflare. I would like to see Push CDN more improved in the next release of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network. From our perspective, if we have a listener that listens for stock updates, I would just need to have one processor that pushes those updates to the Cloudflare API, and then Cloudflare would broadcast that message to all listeners. Cloudflare will check the order of the message, and if you, as a customer, are not connected or have some kind of network issue, when you reconnect, you will receive the latest state and missing updates.

Read full review

KrishnakumarM

CISO at Pink Solutions

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

Application security has protected critical banking services while policy learning minimizes false blocks

F5 Advanced WAF performs well overall, but I have noticed some points that could enhance the solution. Initially, policy tuning could be simpler, as while the learning engine is powerful, initial tuning still requires experienced engineers, which can be challenging for new teams due to the complexity of options and parameters. A more guided and simple tuning workflow would help reduce the learning curve. Additionally, tighter native integration with SIEM or SOAR tools would simplify correlation and investigations for security teams, although log exports are available. Overall, these are not blockers, merely enhancement opportunities, and once tuned, F5 Advanced WAF is very stable and reliable; improving usability, reporting, and onboarding would make it even more effective for larger environments.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

I don't see room for improvement to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. One thing I don't know much about because we...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

We are using Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools with their Zero Trust, so e...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The setup cost was taken with the head of the department, who handled the pricing and everything.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point could improve or add more flexibility when it comes to migrating to different sites. Multi-tenancy is an ...

See all answers

What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?

It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the r...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

The pricing for F5 Advanced WAF is a bit higher, but not that high. I would say for a good amount of revenue-generati...

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

On the features I wish existed, Big-IP Advanced WAF is primarily an on-premises solution and in that solution, there ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 6% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 25% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Radware Cloud WAF Service vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 3% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

March 2026

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

March 2026

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF

March 2026

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Cloudflare

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

F5 Advanced WAF is a web application security solution for financial and government sectors, e-commerce, and public-facing websites. It offers protection against various attacks, including botnets, web scraping, and foreign entities. The solution can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud and is often used with other security tools. Its most valuable features include DDoS and DNS attack protection, SSL uploading, anomaly detection, and the ability to input custom rules.

F5 Advanced WAF has helped organizations to expose more services to the public while providing an extra layer of protection, preventing revenue loss, and securing connectivity.

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

Orange España, Paschoalotto

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF

March 2026

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.