Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Encryption (7th), Mobile Data Protection (4th)
McAfee Total Protection for...
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Security solutions, they serve different purposes. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is designed for Endpoint Encryption and holds a mindshare of 1.9%, up 1.5% compared to last year.
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 1.0% mindshare, down 1.8% since last year.
Endpoint Encryption
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.
VivekGupta7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup
There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."
"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."
"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."
"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."
"The most valuable feature is strong data leak prevention for data protection."
"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."
"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."
"The initial setup process was easy."
"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."
 

Cons

"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."
"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."
"There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected."
"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."
"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."
"The support from McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is good. However, if they provided 24 hours a day seven days a week support that would be a helpful addition."
"The initial setup is very complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"The price is high for this type of product."
"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."
"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Security Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Retailer
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.
What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the usern...
What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?
The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Kleberg Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: March 2025.
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.