Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Cuckoo Sandbox comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Cuckoo are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Cuckoo is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.7. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to Cuckoo’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cuckoo users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 59 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

326 Views
160 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cuckoo Sandbox

Read 3 Cuckoo Sandbox reviews

2,289 Views
1,254 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Cuckoo Sandbox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and Cuckoo Sandbox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Anti-Malware Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (4th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)

Cuckoo Sandbox

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cuckoo Sandbox is 2.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer8099174

IT Help Support - Coop at DistillerSR

Secure access with an intuitive design and straightforward controls

In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options with a broader range of third-party tools would be beneficial for seamless compatibility with various existing systems. As for additional features in the next release, it would be great to see advanced threat detection and response capabilities integrated into the platform. This would further enhance security by proactively identifying and mitigating potential threats. Additionally, improved mobile device management features and more comprehensive user behavior analytics would be valuable additions to meet evolving cybersecurity needs.

Read full review

Adrián Rodriguez Garcia

Senior Threat Intelligence & Hunting Analyst/Consultant at Wise Security Global

Provides detailed behavior analysis while needing improvements in signature detection

I use Cuckoo Sandbox primarily for automated malware behavior analysis. Specifically, it helps me extract indicators of compromise (IOC) to add to different platforms in the security environment of my company Cuckoo can show me every behavior in a machine. For example, it shows all files…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Harmony SASE helps us to manage compliance by regulating the amount of access to each department and user. We control the relevant apps and websites, which can be accessed from company-owned devices. Harmony SASE uses its own threat intelligence data from the cloud for threat prevention, and detect and manage threats with their own threat intelligence data and SASE firewall features."

"It keeps us all accountable and ensures secure internet connections while we all work remotely."

"The ease of use not only translates to quick adoption rates - it also ensures that our employees remain compliant with our cybersecurity protocols, enhancing the overall security posture of our organization."

"Scaling Perimeter 81 was easy to do."

"Distributing the agent was very simple, allowing us to enforce security posture on our devices (i.e. S1, Disk-encryption, etc.)."

"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."

"Logging back into Perimeter 81 is relatively user-friendly as I just need to re-type my Windows credentials in to access the VPN."

"The solution offers ATP features and management features."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"Cuckoo Sandbox is very stable and reliable."

"The dynamic analysis feature in Cuckoo Sandbox is excellent compared to others."

"The scalability is an eight out of ten."

"Cuckoo Sandbox is very stable and reliable."

Cons

"Providing USB control in a Linux environment will give more control over data security."

"I have found that the log-in/out process takes quite some time."

"One of our challenges is ensuring the security of our cloud-based operations."

"Although the interface is user-friendly, further simplification and customization options tailored for non-technical users would benefit smaller firms without dedicated IT teams. Intuitive dashboards and guided setups can help in reducing the learning curve."

"They could improve on the available public documentation."

"While the product has been instrumental in enhancing security, continuous improvement is essential. Feedback from users and ongoing technological advancements should guide the refinement of these security measures."

"Sometimes, the product is very slow."

"The integration from a management perspective could be improved so that the management can, from an existing Check Point firewall, manage a Harmony firewall through one pane of glass."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"It lacks correlation with other types of information, such as explaining why a particular file was modified or identifying the specific process responsible."

"I want the command to be quicker."

"The only issue is with the installation, which requires some adjustments."

"Cuckoo Sandbox could improve its signature detection because it currently only shows simple file modifications and connections to different botnets."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."

"The product's pricing model accommodates diverse needs and deployment sizes."

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"We have to pay five to ten thousand dollars for this solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Educational Organization

13%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?

Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?

It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cuckoo Sandbox?

I don't know the price as I always use the free version of Cuckoo Sandbox.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cuckoo Sandbox?

The only issue is with the installation, which requires some adjustments. We need to check the OS level for compatibility. This can be challenging for those who are new to Cuckoo Sandbox.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cuckoo Sandbox?

We are using Cuckoo Sandbox ( /products/cuckoo-sandbox-reviews ) for phishing emails and malware analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 17% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 13% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 7% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

ANY.RUN vs Cuckoo Sandbox

Compared 35% of the time

VirusTotal vs Cuckoo Sandbox

Compared 24% of the time

VMRay vs Cuckoo Sandbox

Compared 11% of the time

Remnux vs Cuckoo Sandbox

Compared 11% of the time

Joe Sandbox Detect vs Cuckoo Sandbox

Compared 8% of the time

More Cuckoo Sandbox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

April 2025

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2025

Download Cuckoo Sandbox product report

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

No data available

Overview

Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based network security and software-defined perimeter (SDP) solution designed to provide secure access to resources in the cloud, data centers, and on-premises environments. It offers a unified platform for organizations to manage and secure their network infrastructure, regardless of the location or type of resources.

Perimeter 81 Benefits:

Easy to use
Flexible access policies
Strong encryption and authentication protocols
Scalable
Compatible with various devices and platforms

Perimeter 81 Features:

Secure Network Access: Perimeter 81 provides secure access to internal resources and cloud-based applications through its client applications and gateways.
Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP): SDP is a security framework that focuses on dynamically creating secure connections between users and resources on a need-to-know basis.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Perimeter 81 follows the Zero Trust security model, which assumes that no user or device can be inherently trusted.
Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Cloud Support: Perimeter 81 is designed to secure access to resources across multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments.
User and Device Management: The solution offers centralized user and device management capabilities, allowing administrators to define access policies, manage user roles, and enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for enhanced security.
Network Segmentation: Perimeter 81 enables organizations to segment their network resources, creating isolated environments based on logical groupings.
Centralized Management and Analytics: Perimeter 81 provides a centralized management console where administrators can configure and monitor their network security settings.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user, Frontend Developer at Limelight Networks, states that "We use some VPN solutions, and Perimeter 81 has the best user experience for desktop or mobile".

Daniel Goldfeld, Vice President of Customer Success at Mine - The All-in-One Privacy Suite, says that Perimeter 81 has "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions".

Another PeerSpot user, Accounts Payable Specialist at Simera, writes that "The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."

Check Point Software Technologies

Cuckoo Sandbox is an open-source malware analysis system that aids in detecting and analyzing malicious files and URLs. Its primary use case is to provide a secure environment for executing suspicious files or websites and generating detailed reports on their behavior.

The most valuable functionality of Cuckoo Sandbox is its ability to perform dynamic analysis, which involves monitoring the behavior of malware in a controlled environment. It employs various techniques such as system monitoring, network traffic analysis, and API call tracing to gather information about the malware's activities.

Cuckoo Sandbox helps organizations by providing them with actionable insights into potential threats. By running suspicious files or URLs in a controlled environment, it can identify and analyze malware that might otherwise go undetected. This helps organizations understand the behavior and capabilities of malware, enabling them to develop effective strategies for prevention, detection, and response.

Additionally, Cuckoo Sandbox generates comprehensive reports that include detailed information about the malware's actions, network communication, and system modifications. These reports aid in forensic investigations and provide valuable intelligence for threat-hunting and incident response teams.

Cuckoo

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox

February 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cuckoo Sandbox report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.