Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.4 out of 5

59 reviews
97% willing to recommend

180 followers

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive cloud security, seamless integration, and advanced threat prevention capabilities, ensuring robust protection and enhanced network performance for organizations of all sizes.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella offers ease of deployment with cloud-based security, ideal for educational institutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced features suited for complex security needs, despite its setup complexity. Cost-effectiveness varies, with Cisco's pricing challenges outside the U.S.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access focuses on visibility and zero-trust, offering seamless integration with other Palo Alto products. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in robust threat prevention and unified security, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive protection and easier scalability.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, contrasting with Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, contrasting with Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for simplicity and zero-day protection, offering significant ROI. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange excels in security depth with CASB and advanced SSL inspection, providing great web filtering but with less straightforward configuration for SMEs.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is noted for its higher initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope excels in Cloud Access Security Broker capabilities, ideal for data compliance. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides strong Zero Trust Network Access, suiting secure remote access needs. Netskope's high ROI is balanced by Check Point’s advanced features offering substantial value for larger enterprises.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Report

Pricing

Netskope's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more competitive and budget-friendly setup pricing, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security features, making it suitable for secure remote access and private cloud deployment. In comparison, Cloudflare One excels with its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appealing to teams seeking easy deployment and scalability in public cloud infrastructures.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cloudflare One Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs that appeal to budget-conscious users, while Cloudflare One provides more premium setup options suitable for those looking for advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers extensive next-generation firewall capabilities with centralized management and a self-healing model for threat detection. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on zero trust network access and anti-phishing, ensuring data security and compliance.

Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report

Pricing

Cato SASE Cloud Platform has a moderate setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) features a lower setup cost, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment between the two security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

iboss

4.3 out of 5

iboss

4.3 out of 5

Iboss is valued for dynamic scaling, cloud-based security, and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-focused enterprises. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers extensive network protection and easy deployment, attracting companies prioritizing comprehensive security features and seamless integration despite higher costs.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. iboss Report

Pricing

iboss offers a budget-friendly setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a more comprehensive initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

iboss offers a budget-friendly setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a more comprehensive initial investment.

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN

4.1 out of 5

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN

4.1 out of 5

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN, recognized for network optimization, suits multinational deployments needing reliable connectivity. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE, with strong security features, is ideal for companies prioritizing sophisticated protection and access control. VeloCloud offers flexibility, while Check Point enhances network security.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report

Pricing

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN offers a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which reflects the more comprehensive initial investment required by the latter.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN offers a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which reflects the more comprehensive initial investment required by the latter.

FortiSASE

3.9 out of 5

FortiSASE

3.9 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE excels with features like Zero Trust Network Access and HTTPS decryption, providing comprehensive security and flexibility. In comparison, FortiSASE is simpler to deploy, valued for AI-based threat detection and leveraging Fortinet’s cloud infrastructure for enhanced tenant control.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. FortiSASE Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs compared to FortiSASE, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs compared to FortiSASE, which requires a higher initial investment.

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security

4.2 out of 5

Skyhigh Security excels in shadow IT identification, risk assessment, and compliance for cloud services. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers advanced threat prevention and secure access features, including Zero Trust Network Access, making it favorable for broader network security offerings.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Skyhigh Security Report

Pricing

Skyhigh Security has a higher setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE boasts a more budget-friendly initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Skyhigh Security has a higher setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE boasts a more budget-friendly initial setup.

Show 5 more products

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN