Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo

Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
175 followers
Post review

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella offers ease of deployment with cloud-based security, ideal for educational institutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced features suited for complex security needs, despite its setup complexity. Cost-effectiveness varies, with Cisco's pricing challenges outside the U.S.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Access focuses on visibility and zero-trust, offering seamless integration with other Palo Alto products. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in robust threat prevention and unified security, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive protection and easier scalability.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, contrasting with Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, contrasting with Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive security and ease of integration, appealing for smaller setups seeking responsive support and cost-effective deployment. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange attracts larger enterprises with advanced threat protection and scalability, justifying its higher cost and complexity.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cost-effective setup compared to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cost-effective setup compared to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, which has a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Netskope excels in Cloud Access Security Broker capabilities, ideal for data compliance. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides strong Zero Trust Network Access, suiting secure remote access needs. Netskope's high ROI is balanced by Check Point’s advanced features offering substantial value for larger enterprises.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Report
Netskope's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more competitive and budget-friendly setup pricing, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more competitive and budget-friendly setup pricing, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security features, making it suitable for secure remote access and private cloud deployment. In comparison, Cloudflare One excels with its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appealing to teams seeking easy deployment and scalability in public cloud infrastructures.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cloudflare One Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs that appeal to budget-conscious users, while Cloudflare One provides more premium setup options suitable for those looking for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs that appeal to budget-conscious users, while Cloudflare One provides more premium setup options suitable for those looking for advanced features.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.4 out of 5
Cato SASE Cloud excels with centralized security and always-on VPN, ideal for optimizing branch connectivity. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in zero-trust access and network integration, appealing to those seeking enhanced remote connection control and comprehensive threat prevention.
Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Cato SASE Cloud Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Cato SASE Cloud Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
4.1 out of 5
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN, recognized for network optimization, suits multinational deployments needing reliable connectivity. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE, with strong security features, is ideal for companies prioritizing sophisticated protection and access control. VeloCloud offers flexibility, while Check Point enhances network security.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN offers a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which reflects the more comprehensive initial investment required by the latter.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN offers a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which reflects the more comprehensive initial investment required by the latter.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.3 out of 5
Iboss is valued for dynamic scaling, cloud-based security, and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-focused enterprises. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers extensive network protection and easy deployment, attracting companies prioritizing comprehensive security features and seamless integration despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. iboss Report
iboss offers a budget-friendly setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a more comprehensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
iboss offers a budget-friendly setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a more comprehensive initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Skyhigh Security excels in shadow IT identification, risk assessment, and compliance for cloud services. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers advanced threat prevention and secure access features, including Zero Trust Network Access, making it favorable for broader network security offerings.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Skyhigh Security Report
Skyhigh Security has a higher setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE boasts a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Skyhigh Security has a higher setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE boasts a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Appgate SDP is valued for its robust security policies and micro-segmentation, appealing to cost-sensitive businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers an integrated cloud-friendly platform, making it attractive for larger enterprises needing versatility and extensive deployment and support options.
Download Appgate SDP vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Appgate SDP offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup is more complex and potentially costly.
View comparison
Pricing
Appgate SDP offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup is more complex and potentially costly.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels with features like Zero Trust Network Access and HTTPS decryption, providing comprehensive security and flexibility. In comparison, FortiSASE is simpler to deploy, valued for AI-based threat detection and leveraging Fortinet’s cloud infrastructure for enhanced tenant control.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. FortiSASE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs compared to FortiSASE, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs compared to FortiSASE, which requires a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in security integration with comprehensive features appealing to enterprises. In comparison, Twingate's zero-trust architecture offers deployment flexibility, catering to businesses seeking ease and scalability. Check Point offers robust long-term ROI, while Twingate provides fast implementation and affordability.
Check Point Harmony SASE setup costs are competitive and cater to various organizational sizes, whereas Twingate offers a straightforward setup with potentially lower initial cost implications.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE setup costs are competitive and cater to various organizational sizes, whereas Twingate offers a straightforward setup with potentially lower initial cost implications.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a broad feature set with secure web gateway and zero trust network access, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Axis Security provides robust application security and granular user control, appealing to those seeking specialized security solutions.
Download Axis Security vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower setup costs, while Axis Security incurs higher initial investments, highlighting a significant difference in initial affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower setup costs, while Axis Security incurs higher initial investments, highlighting a significant difference in initial affordability.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access excels in affordable pricing and customer support, attracting buyers with its zero-trust architecture and ease of setup. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE appeals to tech buyers with its comprehensive security features, offering advanced threat protection despite potentially higher costs.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access involves a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in pricing and ease of deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking straightforward implementation. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE impresses with advanced features like threat protection and analytics, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive security despite a complex deployment process.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Forcepoint ONE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers an affordable setup with straightforward implementation, while Forcepoint ONE presents higher initial costs. The setup cost is a significant factor distinguishing Check Point Harmony SASE from Forcepoint ONE.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers an affordable setup with straightforward implementation, while Forcepoint ONE presents higher initial costs. The setup cost is a significant factor distinguishing Check Point Harmony SASE from Forcepoint ONE.

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN