Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point IPS vs Splunk User Behavior Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk User Behavior Analytics
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Check Point IPS is 6.7%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk User Behavior Analytics is 2.3%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Greg Tate - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules
Support is the biggest area for improvement. Check Point is responsive, however, their support agents seem to be very siloed in their ability and/or product knowledge. It takes time and escalation to get through most tickets as they are passed from one group to another and then back again. We are able to navigate our support issues with the aid of our account team, so I want to underscore that support is indeed responsive. However, the processes support techs have to follow seem to be the root cause of the support response issues.
Hamada-Elewa - PeerSpot reviewer
Decreases the false positives but storage model complexity hampers efficiency
I recommend it to my customers, but I'm a salesman. I am not implementing it myself It decreases the false positives, so it will decrease the time consumed by the operation team to work on Splunk. The most effective one is the integration with other vendors. This is the most attractive one.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Check Point is one of the best security brands worldwide."
"Real-time protection has blocked most threats that could affect system operations."
"The Check Point IPS feature I find the most valuable is the firewall. It is great and easy to work with."
"Some of the features for views and visualization are already predefined as default files."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is that it protects us against hundreds of different attack vectors, like ransomware. The protection is always being triggered. People try to access websites that are categorized as malware, so when the users do a DNS request for the IP of those malware websites, the IPS Blade replaces the real IP of the website that is malware with a bogus IP. The user gets an IP that doesn't exist and when he tries to access, it won't work."
"User-friendly and easy to implement."
"Its event analysis and centralization features are very important for any organization."
"The solution's most valuable feature is Splunk queries, which allow us to query the logs and analyze the attack vectors."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The most valuable features are the indexing and powerful search features."
"Splunk is more user-friendly than some competing solutions we tried."
"The most valuable features are its data aggregation and the ability to automatically identify a number of threats, then suggest recommended actions upon them."
"The most effective one is the integration with other vendors."
"It's easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."
 

Cons

"From the product perspective, there have been instances where the signature download caused issues."
"Signature tuning should be more user-friendly in the tool because, as per my experience, signature tuning is tough in Check Point IPS."
"I hear from my admin that the firmware upgrade process is quite cumbersome."
"When entering, it always takes a long time to load."
"The installation documentation has room for improvement."
"There is no standalone IPS appliance available."
"Despite being a blade, this is expensive."
"The solution’s deployment could be easier."
"It would be good if the solution had an analytics tool that allowed us to analyze the data without writing specific queries."
"There are occasional bugs."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
"The correlation engine should have persistent and definable rules."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product should be reduced."
"You can pay for Check Point IPS yearly, or you can go with a three-year license. There's no extra cost apart from the standard licensing fee."
"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is very cheap and ten means it is very expensive. The product is expensive."
"My company pays for the yearly licensing of Check Point IPS. It is a very expensive tool."
"The pricing is quite reasonable."
"I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
"Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
"There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
"The licensing costs is around 10,000 dollars."
"I am not aware of the price, but it is expensive."
"Pricing varies based on the packages you choose and the volume of your usage."
"There are additional costs associated with the integrator."
"I hope we can increase the free license to be more than 5 gig a day. This would help people who want to introduce a POC or a demo license for the solution."
"My biggest complaint is the way they do pricing... You can never know the pricing for next year. Every single time you adjust to something new, the price goes up. It's impossible to truly budget for it. It goes up constantly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point IPS?
The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point IPS?
The price could be lower. It's always better for an end user when prices are reduced. The cost makes it difficult to implement in smaller companies.
What needs improvement with Check Point IPS?
Currently, the solution is good for my needs, so I don't have any particular improvements to recommend. However, a reduction in price would always be welcome.
What do you like most about Splunk User Behavior Analytics?
The solution's most valuable feature is Splunk queries, which allow us to query the logs and analyze the attack vectors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk User Behavior Analytics?
It's too expensive. If you need observability, you will pay for the whole package of observability. But if you need anything in security, you will pay for the whole package, then you can select the...
What needs improvement with Splunk User Behavior Analytics?
Enhancing the storage model that they are using is necessary. It's too much. The number of VMs, the total number of VMs, is overwhelming. The system is stable, but for the storage issues requiring ...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
Caspida, Splunk UBA
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.