Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Check Point IPS is 6.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 4.2%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Greg Tate - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules
Support is the biggest area for improvement. Check Point is responsive, however, their support agents seem to be very siloed in their ability and/or product knowledge. It takes time and escalation to get through most tickets as they are passed from one group to another and then back again. We are able to navigate our support issues with the aid of our account team, so I want to underscore that support is indeed responsive. However, the processes support techs have to follow seem to be the root cause of the support response issues.
YoussefBoukari - PeerSpot reviewer
Very effective for malware and signature-based anomalies but stability needs improvement
Our company uses the solution for data functions in banking. It is a backend solution in the server center.  We analyze traffic and adapt configurations or customize policies to the environment of the IPS itself.  The solution very effectively provides malware protection and signature-based…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The notifications are the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The integration of IPS with the firewall is quite efficient."
"The autonomous threat prevention is very easy to use. The APIs and SmartConsole tool also work well."
"IPS easily allows follow-up flags on recently updated patterns. If, in rare cases, a false positive does occur, it is quickly detected and an exception can be easily created."
"IPS can protect our organization with any old vulnerabilities or if any vulnerability detected minutes ago IPS can protect us as per our configured policy."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that the product's stability has been very good. The"
"What I like best about Check Point IPS is that it can prevent attacks. I also like that it has a log feature."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point IPS is the management of devices and policies."
"We use the solution for cybersecurity purposes. The tool helps us to identify anomalies that come from internal or external networks."
"Good IPS and VirtualBox features."
"The solution is very stable."
"The cost is the most valuable feature."
"I like the way the tool pushes the packets from the node level."
"We are satisfied with the technical support."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco NGIPS is the centralized user interface. You have the ability to quickly push out configurations across your environment using the Cisco UI. It's a powerful capability of that solution."
"This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen."
 

Cons

"This is an expensive solution, higher than other products on the market."
"I would like to have the possibility of adding features to this IPS solution in the future."
"Occasionally there are glitches and errors like false positives, which would be a nice area of this solution to improve upon."
"The hardware-based version of Check Point IPS could be more scalable. Right now, it's not scalable."
"Signature tuning should be more user-friendly in the tool because, as per my experience, signature tuning is tough in Check Point IPS."
"There is an issue with precision."
"The dashboard reports can be easier to generate and customize."
"A reduction in price would always be welcome."
"The CLI, the console line interface, of the FTD could be improved. It's very complex, so without a GUI, it doesn't work well. I would like it to be more simple."
"The solution would be better if it offered customers more integrations and more signatures."
"It is no longer scalable because it has gone end of life."
"Cisco NGIPS could improve its ability to do SSL inspections. Sometimes the ability to do SSL inspection is not scalable and you might not be able to get the installment required if you don't size the right hardware."
"Cisco NGIPS should work on its shortcomings related to the issues that stem from bugs and performance."
"Overall, it lacks user-friendliness. It could be easier to manage. I can train any customer using FortiGate or Palo Alto in a few days, but with Cisco, it takes much more time because the systems aren't easy to use."
"I would like to see integration with monitoring tools such as Nagios or BMC."
"The aspect of private party integration solutions could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company pays for the yearly licensing of Check Point IPS. It is a very expensive tool."
"The pricing model can be more competitive."
"The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
"Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
"It is a reasonably priced product."
"Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
"There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
"The price of this product should be reduced."
"We pay for the IPS license to use this solution."
"Cisco products are not cheap and this solution is no different."
"The price for additional throughput is the highest in the industry."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
"The weakness of Cisco Firepower is the cost. Some of the customers see it as very expensive."
"Pricing depends on negotiation with the vendor, although I can say that it is moderate."
"It is highly priced but competitive regarding features and support services."
"Cisco products are always expensive, but if you can afford the price then it's a great solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
University
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point IPS?
The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point IPS?
The price could be lower. It's always better for an end user when prices are reduced. The cost makes it difficult to implement in smaller companies.
What needs improvement with Check Point IPS?
Currently, the solution is good for my needs, so I don't have any particular improvements to recommend. However, a reduction in price would always be welcome.
What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
The dashboard is quite old compared to today's technology. We would like to see improvements in the dashboard features.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.