Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Users find ROI calculation challenging, but Check Point IPS offers valuable security, cost-saving, and quick financial returns.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Secure IPS improves threat detection, though setup costs impact ROI recognition, yet users acknowledge enhanced network protection.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Check Point IPS support gets mixed reviews, praising responsiveness but noting slow responses and knowledge gaps, especially on weekends.
Sentiment score
7.3
Cisco Secure IPS customer service is responsive and expert, though regional variability suggests room for improvement in initial response times.
Our technical teams have personal relationships with our account executives and direct support people.
Fortinet, on the other hand, offers quicker response times and same-day RMAs, which gives them an edge in customer service.
The response was fast, and they provided experts to solve our issues quickly.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Check Point IPS excels in scalability and flexibility, especially in cloud and hybrid environments, with some hardware limitations noted.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Secure IPS scales well for various organizations but faces hardware constraints and high costs affecting flexibility.
We have moved to a hyper-scale master environment, allowing us to scale by adding additional gateways to the clusters.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point IPS is highly stable, with minimal incidents and high reliability, earning user ratings of eight to ten.
Sentiment score
7.6
Cisco Secure IPS is generally stable and reliable, though some users report bugs and mixed feelings about its dependability.
Check Point IPS provides a very stable and reliable environment.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point IPS needs better detection, performance, user-friendliness, cloud integration, support, and updated documentation, with lower costs.
Cisco Secure IPS users desire better SIEM integration, user-friendliness, third-party tools support, and enhanced management with AI and cloud integration.
Incorporating AI capabilities would enhance its functionality.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point IPS is costly but offers value and savings through bundled licenses, benefiting enterprise buyers.
Cisco Secure IPS is costly but valued for strong security, with potential deals and discounts available through vendor negotiation.
Comparisons with Fortinet show that Check Point IPS is relatively more expensive, but we found it cheaper to retain it rather than switch.
It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscription costs.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point IPS offers real-time updates, seamless integration, and robust protection, ensuring comprehensive and customizable network security management.
Cisco Secure IPS offers robust threat detection, seamless integration, and adaptable security features for comprehensive and cost-effective network protection.
Check Point IPS is very useful in providing access control at the network level and preventing access from suspicious sources.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is quite powerful for threat detection and includes botnet detection.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Check Point IPS is 5.8%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 4.2%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Greg Tate - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules
Support is the biggest area for improvement. Check Point is responsive, however, their support agents seem to be very siloed in their ability and/or product knowledge. It takes time and escalation to get through most tickets as they are passed from one group to another and then back again. We are able to navigate our support issues with the aid of our account team, so I want to underscore that support is indeed responsive. However, the processes support techs have to follow seem to be the root cause of the support response issues.
Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga - PeerSpot reviewer
Effectively identifies malicious behavior while future automation and AI advancements hold potential
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) ( /products/cisco-secure-ips-ngips-reviews ) is quite powerful for threat detection and includes botnet detection. It effectively blocks unwanted software, hashes, and suspicious behaviors. The tool is easy to integrate with other IT security solutions due to similar protocols. The system offers effective threat detection features, although automation capabilities are not yet fully utilized.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point IPS?
The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point IPS?
The price could be lower. It's always better for an end user when prices are reduced. The cost makes it difficult to implement in smaller companies.
What needs improvement with Check Point IPS?
Currently, the solution is good for my needs, so I don't have any particular improvements to recommend. However, a reduction in price would always be welcome.
What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?
Cisco is one of the top brands known for cost-effectiveness, making it worth the money. It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscri...
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
In the future, I hope to see automation features like automatic blocking and rule creation. Additionally, incorporating AI capabilities would enhance its functionality.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.