Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Cisco and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 3.3% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Read 69 Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) reviews

2,367 Views
2,296 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Read 16 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews

1,376 Views
1,238 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and Cisco Secure IPS compete in cybersecurity, focusing on threat protection for network infrastructures. Trellix has an advantage in budget and support, while Cisco excels in features, providing greater value at a higher cost.

Features: Trellix provides advanced threat detection, infrastructure integration, and centralized management. Cisco offers real-time threat protection, network visibility, and flexibility. Cisco's capabilities deliver deeper security insights.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance its threat intelligence and analytics capabilities. It may also benefit from adding more real-time monitoring options. Meanwhile, Cisco could improve ease of deployment to streamline the installation process. It may also work on reducing complexity and enhancing user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support, ideal for quick setup. Cisco's deployment is resource-intensive but supported by extensive systems, beneficial for complex installations.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix provides cost-effective solutions with significant ROI through efficient resource use. Cisco's higher initial costs are offset by its advanced technology, delivering substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)	3.3%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System	2.9%
Other	93.8%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer373227

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Marketing strengths shine but regaining user trust needs significant effort

There are numerous things that could be improved about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) to get it back on track. Sollution for small branches: when we have to connect a lot very small branches (or sometimes only an ATM) we need something small, with LTE and with reasonable price. Cisco response is SDWAN but it is not always the case. Recently Cisco released some small firewalls but I have not tried them yet. Central management with FMC is a very good idea, but sometimes local management or monitoring is helpfull. With Cisco You have to decide: central or local. You cannot have both. Regarding usability, when you commit configuration on Cisco, it sometimes takes very long. Commits also take some time for the competition, but Cisco is definitely lagging behind the rest in this respect. Last but not least, for me as a professional is lack of CLI. With CLI, I can configure every firewall on the market except Cisco. CLI is very important in professional working, and IMHO it was an unwise decision by Cisco to remove it. Graphical interfaces are very nice, but when you've got thousands of objects in a big installation and have to configure many things, CLI is a much faster way to do it.

Read full review

Bhupesh-Sharma

Large account Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited

Has offered reliable threat protection and detailed network insights but could expand features beyond existing capabilities

The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs). They track and collect data from APTs, which allows them to track malicious files entering the environment. The system offers inline prevention and real-time automatic blocking of malicious packets before they reach the network. It integrates with the Trellix ecosystem and provides application visibility and control. The solution provides deep insight into network traffic, applications, and protocols for better information. All packets coming through the application are analyzed and reported. They share intelligence updates regularly to protect from different malicious files and sector-specific threats. It supports both on-premise and cloud environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has good intelligence. It does a great job at stopping threats."

"I would say it's a good product if you look at the primary functionality, which is intrusion prevention."

"It has increased our security posture and has contributed substantially to our security maturity by stopping threats."

"The solution is stable. This is one of the good things in Firepower. Especially if we use ESE with it."

"Its ease of use and its ability to block and allow ports in and out of our organization are the most valuable features. It works very well. It gives us all the information that we need."

"IPS is a valuable function, because they update the signatures all the time and it's very granular."

"This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen."

"We primarily use this solution as an application filter and for IPS."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pros

"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."

"The feature I found most valuable is the network threat analyzer in the security platform. It also integrates with GTI, or Global Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I just use the basic features."

"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."

"The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs)."

"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."

"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."

"It improved my security by stopping an attack to the signature base, or the behavior base."

"It works very well overall, and is excellent for enterprise-level businesses."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros

Cons

"The attack patterns and payloads go undetected in Cisco. We would like to see a new solution with more effective detection of attack patterns. There should be more data analyzing patterns as well which provides useful information."

"It is no longer scalable because it has gone end of life."

"This solution is not easily scaled."

"The GUI user interface could be improved and the login is not very user friendly."

"The solution requires better management. When it comes to central management capabilities, improvements can be made."

"I recommend it to other users, but I am concerned about stability, as the stability is not adequate."

"I'd like to see some cloud management."

"The price could be improved."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) cons

"In terms of high-security attacks, not all of them are developed. You cannot do a rule that includes all high severities."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"The technical support must be improved."

"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."

"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."

"The deployment was a little difficult, I did it myself."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The management component could be simplified."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive product, with the biggest cost being the license that keeps the service going."

"The cost of the license depends on the level of support that you have with Cisco."

"Cisco NGIPS is an expensive product."

"They are very expensive in some places and not reasonable at times for many customers. I have had customers choose another solution because of the high price."

"I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5."

"We get cut in price since we use other Cisco products. We have the whole bundle of Cisco solutions."

"It is highly priced but competitive regarding features and support services."

"Cisco products are not cheap and this solution is no different."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pricing and cost advice

"The tool is competitively priced."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?

I would rate the price for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) as high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?

I am aware that we are not measuring some metrics or tracking access through Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS). In my opinion, Cisco could improve the Web GUI for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS).

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco NGIPS?

Our main use case for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is in-line traffic control, and we are using IPS in an in-line mode.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Network Security Platform?

We do not use Trellix Intrusion Prevention System; rather, we sell the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System solution. The typical use case for our clients is to find out what vulnerable files exist....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Network Security Platform?

I have experience working with other tools, specifically Trellix solutions such as DLP, EDR, and MDR, as well as with other Imperva tools. My team has worked with Trellix Intrusion Prevention Syste...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 9% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Competitors

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 10% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

April 2026

Download Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

March 2026

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report

Download Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS

McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS

Overview

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) provides intrusion prevention, malware detection, and DDoS protection with modularity, third-party integration, and cloud capabilities, focusing on flexibility, automation, and real-time threat detection, while offering centralized management and ease of upgrading.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is designed to support network security through an open platform, delivering features such as anomaly detection and security intelligence. Users benefit from robust technical support, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking to protect their network infrastructures. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness, interface complexity, and integration with third-party tools. There is a demand for better reporting, sandboxing capabilities, and enhanced AI-driven threat detection and response times, especially for zero-day attacks. Pricing remains a concern due to high costs and licensing complexity.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure IPS?

Intrusion Prevention: Detect and block malicious activities across networks to maintain security.
Malware Detection: Identify and mitigate malicious software in real time.
DDoS Protection: Safeguard against distributed denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt operations.
Integration: Seamlessly connect with third-party tools for enhanced functionality.
Cloud Capabilities: Use cloud-based resources for scalable and flexible security solutions.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identify potential threats instantly to prevent exploitation.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Centralized management and hardware-free upgrading help reduce expenses.
Flexibility: Modular design and open platform ensure adaptability to changing needs.
Support: Access to expert technical assistance ensures smooth operations.
Scalability: Cloud deployment options offer enhanced scalability for growing demands.

Businesses deploy Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) in both on-premises and cloud environments, addressing needs like compliance audits and integration with platforms such as Cisco Talos and Umbrella. Its implementation strengthens perimeter security, enhances cybersecurity in enterprise and banking sectors, and ensures effective threat management for network defense.

Cisco

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola

Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

March 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.