Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 7.9%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

EP
Mar 11, 2019
This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen
It detects attacks from malicious intrusions and malicious activity before they happen This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen. Signature rules from the Snort community around the world. I would like to see better integration with SIEMs.  Better rule…
VG
Sep 8, 2019
Excellent application control and vulnerability protection but it's a very expensive solution
The primary use is for application control and encryption The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features. The IPS can be improved on the solution.  The itineration, for example. Also, if additional features, like SD Wan, etc. can be added. This would be…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Cisco NGIPS is the centralized user interface. You have the ability to quickly push out configurations across your environment using the Cisco UI. It's a powerful capability of that solution."
"Good IPS and VirtualBox features."
"This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen."
"The Malware Detection, threat defense, sandboxing, VPN and mail security have all been valuable features of Cisco NGIPS."
"The security intelligence in the product is the best feature and give us all the information that we need in our network."
"The initial setup wasn't complex or complicated."
"The solution very effectively provides malware protection and signature-based anomaly detection."
"IPS is a valuable function, because they update the signatures all the time and it's very granular."
"For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."
"The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."
"Edge protection is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."
"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."
"I like the solution's interface."
 

Cons

"The price of Cisco NGIPS could improve."
"I would like to see Cisco NGIPS to include home office support in one single product."
"More flexibility with the dashboards is needed because some of them are not fully developed."
"I would like to see integration with monitoring tools such as Nagios or BMC."
"The solution requires better management. When it comes to central management capabilities, improvements can be made."
"The onboarding process could be made a little bit better."
"The only thing I think they may need to improve on a little bit is identifying software more correctly when you do network discovery."
"If there was a software-based solution for scaling up then it would be much better."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."
"The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."
"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."
"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are licensing fees depending on the features that you are using."
"There is a license required to use Cisco NGIPS and it can be a one or three-year license."
"The licensing can be billed annually or in multi-year contracts such as three, four, or five years."
"The weakness of Cisco Firepower is the cost. Some of the customers see it as very expensive."
"Cisco products are not cheap and this solution is no different."
"Cisco NGIPS is an expensive product."
"The price for additional throughput is the highest in the industry."
"I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5."
"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."
"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."
"It's not too expensive."
"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
"From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
"The pricing could be lower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
University
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
There are certain limitations that need to be addressed.
 

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.