Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Logo

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pros and cons

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5
136 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is valued for its modular design which allows easy upgrades or additions without requiring new hardware.
It provides comprehensive protection features such as application filtering, IPS, DDoS protection, and malware detection.
Its integration with Cisco's broader security portfolio enhances its effectiveness and provides extensive support and documentation to aid implementation.
The IPS functionality is updated regularly, ensuring granular and up-to-date threat detection and prevention capabilities.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) offers robust cybersecurity features that help in real-time threat detection and improving network security posture.

CONS

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is very expensive.
The logging isn't as good as previous solutions like Cisco ASA.
Customers face many bugs and stability issues.
The integration with other products could be improved.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)'s high price is an area of concern.
 

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Pros review quotes

GT
Sep 8, 2022
The top features of Cisco NGIPS, which have been working very well, include stateful inspection and the access list-based security configuration. But from my perspective, the best part of Cisco NGIPS is the licensing process, which is very easy and straightforward. It's essentially copy-paste licensing.
it_user1367703 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2020
Ir's signature-based. We are also using the anomaly baseline formation, where it links the network, then anything that goes away from the norm is also flagged. Those are the two most valuable features.
reviewer1261278 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 21, 2020
The solution gives us a lot of visibility into our security.
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1083318 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 7, 2019
Cisco is number one in the technical support. It's good technical support and this is actually a problem when we do the recruitment for some other products. Other products you are on hold forever and the support might be not the best compared to Cisco.
IR
Nov 11, 2020
The main advantages to Cisco are the scale, the integration, the training, and the possibility of finding somebody to work with.
reviewer1738320 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 14, 2021
I like Firepower's automation, and the security intelligence is a powerful feature.
RK
Feb 24, 2021
Its ease of use and its ability to block and allow ports in and out of our organization are the most valuable features. It works very well. It gives us all the information that we need.
TT
Dec 23, 2021
You can do zero-day prevention and detection. It's quite useful.
reviewer1133913 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2020
I think their fingerprints are good in terms of how they whitelist and blacklist.
reviewer2348394 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 26, 2024
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
 

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Cons review quotes

GT
Sep 8, 2022
The feedback from some of our customers is that they weren't interested in Cisco because it was too complicated to deploy, especially in cloud-related areas.
it_user1367703 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2020
It has room for improvement when it comes to integrating machine learning and AI into it where even if you don't have a baseline that is of length for anomaly detection, it could do more like an AI style machine learning. It learns on its own.
reviewer1261278 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 21, 2020
The solution requires better management. When it comes to central management capabilities, improvements can be made.
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1083318 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 7, 2019
The file trajectory, the trace in contamination files, could be improved.
IR
Nov 11, 2020
I think that some initiation scripts might be helpful because they would make the configuration easier and more user-friendly for customers.
reviewer1738320 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 14, 2021
Our customers are still facing many bugs on the system. It has matured noticeably, but we are still facing multiple stability issues on Firepower. There are more than 80 or 90 bugs for each release node. It's a considerable number of bugs.
RK
Feb 24, 2021
We don't like its licensing model. It has separate licensing for all the features. For instance, to get URL filtering, you need to buy another license. Every feature set seems to require another license. Unless you purchase them all upfront, you find some surprises and realize that you can't do that because you need another license. Its logging isn't quite as good as it used to be in our previous solution. We used to have Cisco ASA, and we could view the logs a lot easier than NGIPS (also known as Firepower). We saw real-time logging, but we don't see that as much in Firepower.
TT
Dec 23, 2021
I'd like to see some cloud management. Cisco maybe already has it, however, my company doesn't use it as cloud management.
reviewer1133913 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2020
The only thing I think they may need to improve on a little bit is identifying software more correctly when you do network discovery.
reviewer2348394 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 26, 2024
The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.