Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs RiskIQ Illuminate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Mindshare comparison

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

KK
Aug 9, 2024
Secures emails and prevents security breaches
The setup was quite easy initially because you have many different options on how you want to set it up, like whether you want it to be able to monitor or intercept. Fine-tuning was needed because of the scaling needs. Sometimes, you get false positives, as with any product. The solution was deployed by two people. The solution can be deployed within a day. Firstly, we had a PoC where the vendor supplied us with the device, which we plugged into a passive mode. We checked how it works, what it protects, and what our other solutions do. When we bought the tool, we implemented it as an email gateway, so all the traffic goes through it, and now it blocks everything that it finds bad.
AH
Jun 4, 2024
Offers firewall protection to data centers along with DSD segregation and gateway monitoring
There are proxy or DNS issues with Palo Alto Networks WildFire. For instance, if there are more than 80 branches physically scattered across the globe, for an office in Sri Lanka if a user want's to browse, all the traffic gets reverted to the main office from where its managed. The solution should be locally accessible. The security implemented in our organization's data center today is necessary, but all the traffic using the solution should go directly to the local ISP of Sri Lanka rather than reverting to the head office location. The system uptime data is unavailable on Palo Alto Networks WildFire's dashboard. The solution's dashboard can also be improved. For instance, if our company management wants to check the system or network uptime for the last month, it cannot be presently checked using the solution. In our company, we have AI integrated into our SDN network, which provides advanced reports, not only with the root cause of issues but also with possible recommendations.
SimonClark - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 4, 2021
Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well
Working for FortNet UK, we advised customers regarding their specific security challenges and would recommend RiskIQ when appropriate. We had numerous customers from industries such as retail, media, hospitality, aviation, and finance. Attack Surface Management provided our customers with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services."
"It saves time with us trying to do the analysis. We use it to try to find out how something got into the network. We use it to stop something before it ever gets in."
"In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud."
"The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted."
"One of its characteristics that we liked the most was its analysis and emulation of activities in the emails since it manages to review them and inspect them if they have an infected attachment."
"Threat extraction can help us to remove malicious content from documents by converting them to PDF."
"It has caught some harmful attachments and downloads."
"When our workers are downloading software, SandBlast Cloud is useful to emulate the downloads that the workers are doing. Then, there are no threats coming into the company."
"The solution handles DSD segregation and monitors the gateways"
"The most valuable feature is the cloud-based protection against zero-day malware attacks."
"The analysis is very fast."
"A good tool for file scanning and email threat detection, especially when it comes to attachments and communications."
"Remote access is excellent."
"For example, if a security Intel threat talks about an IOC. We can then go to our MSP and say, "Is there a signature for this particular type of malware that just came out?" And if they'll say yes, then we'll say, "Okay. Does it apply to these firewalls? And have we seen any hits on it?" There's absolutely value in it."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"There are multiple features like management, intrusion prevention (IPS), URL filtering, anti-spam, and antivirus."
"The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."
 

Cons

"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."
"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."
"We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us."
"Check Point SandBlast Network can improve the integration with third-party vendors, such as EDR or CRM products. For example, IBM Curator."
"The response times were slower, and getting support personnel on the call was more difficult."
"Most of the time stability is okay, but sometimes, we're not able to contact the cloud. It won't last for long. The product could be faster."
"I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product."
"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."
"There are more specialized solutions that compete with Wildfire. Therefore, they need to work on their machine learning and AI to be more competitive."
"There are some formats that the solution cannot support ."
"When comparing this solution to others it is not as good overall."
"They can keep on doing more updates. As new malware and viruses are coming out, they can make sure that WildFire is up to date."
"It's not really their problem, it's a problem across the board. There will always be problems with interrupted traffic. We have to set it up where we're playing a middle man game where we're stripping it out, looking at it, and then putting it back together and sending it on its way. That requires CPU cycles. And there's some overhead with that."
"The threat intelligence that we receiving in the reporting was not as expected. We were expecting more. Additionally, we should be able to whitelist a specific file based on a variety of attributes."
"The system performance degrades after the solution has been deployed for some time. The data that it gives us becomes a little bit slow. When you try to get some data for troubleshooting, it seems like it's working hard to extract that data."
"The free version does not have real-time updates. It is slow."
"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."
"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
"We have seen ROI."
"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."
"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."
"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"The product's cost is high."
"WildFire is a little bit pricey. Sometimes it's difficult to sell it to customers at the current price."
"The solution is worth its price"
"The price is a bit higher than the other products such as TrendMicro, or FireEye."
"It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market."
"It depends on the features. Additional features cost additional money as well."
"There are different types of licenses."
"The pricing and licensing option should be categorized for various countries such as for Bangladesh."
"Pricing could be improved."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user206346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2015
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
11%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point SandBlast Network?
The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted.
What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?
The cost is a little bit high-end, and you need to get precise performance metrics in order to get the correct size. ...
How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?
The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one conside...
Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?
FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like...
How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?
When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advan...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
No data available
RiskIQ Digital Threat Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
DocuSign, Outbrain, The Economist Group, Rackspace, The Citizen Lab
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: September 2024.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.