Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RiskIQ Illuminate vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared RiskIQ and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. RiskIQ is ranked #22 in ASM , and holds a 1.1% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #15 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.4, and holds a 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution.
RiskIQ Illuminate
Read 1 RiskIQ Illuminate review
  • 193 Views
  • 116 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 38 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 1,444 Views
  • 986 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between RiskIQ Illuminate and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Darktrace and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Attack Surface Management (ASM) Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 815,854 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

RiskIQ Illuminate
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Attack Surface Management (ASM) (22nd)
Trellix Network Detection a...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (15th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

RiskIQ Illuminate and Trellix Network Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. RiskIQ Illuminate is designed for Attack Surface Management (ASM) and holds a mindshare of 1.1%, down 4.7% compared to last year.
Trellix Network Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 5.1% mindshare, down 6.1% since last year.
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

SimonClark - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 4, 2021
Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well
Working for FortNet UK, we advised customers regarding their specific security challenges and would recommend RiskIQ when appropriate. We had numerous customers from industries such as retail, media, hospitality, aviation, and finance. Attack Surface Management provided our customers with…
Read full review
BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 4, 2024
Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one
The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."
"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."
"The server appliance is good."
"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution."
"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."
"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."
"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."
"We'd like the potential for better scaling."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"It is not a very secure product."
"Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization."
"The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless."
"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."
"Technical support could be improved."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
"The pricing is a little high."
"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
"The tool is a bit pricey."
"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less r...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
The solution's support needs to improve their support.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 20% of the time
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 16% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 6% of the time
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
October 2024
RiskIQ Illuminate reportDownload RiskIQ Illuminate product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Network Detection and Response
October 2024
Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

RiskIQ Digital Threat Management
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Learn More

RiskIQ
Video not available
Trellix
 

Overview

Threats are as vast as the internet. Defending your attack surface is a challenge of continuous change and global scale. RiskIQ Illuminate Internet Intelligence shows cyber threats relevant to your critical assets through connected digital relationships. It is the only security intelligence solution with tailored attack surface intelligence to uncover exposures, risks, and threats against your unique digital footprint, pinpointing what’s relevant to you—all in one place.

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign, Outbrain, The Economist Group, Rackspace, The Citizen Lab
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Buyer's Guide
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
October 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Darktrace and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.