Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan comparison

Checkmarx and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.8. Checkmarx holds a 12.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.
Checkmarx One
Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 27,270 Views
  • 17,669 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Kiuwan
Read 23 Kiuwan reviews
  • 1,672 Views
  • 1,334 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Kiuwan are leading contenders in application security testing. Users indicate Checkmarx One holds an advantage in pricing and support satisfaction, while Kiuwan excels in feature offerings, making it appealing for feature-focused users.

Features: Checkmarx One excels in comprehensive security testing, seamless integration capabilities, and delivering detailed code analysis. Kiuwan is noted for providing intricate vulnerability reports, ease of configuration, and facilitating efficient remediation processes.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance performance speed, back-end robustness, and scanning optimization to deliver faster results. Kiuwan's documentation clarity, dashboard usability, and intuitive navigation could be improved for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers simple deployment options but should focus on quicker support response times. Kiuwan is praised for its smooth deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One's slightly higher setup costs are justified by its functionality. Kiuwan offers attractive pricing and ROI, due to its efficiency and lower initial costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Checkmarx One's support is generally rated positively for knowledgeability and quick responses, despite occasional delays and unresolved issues.
No sentiment score available
Kiuwan's customer service is praised for expertise, though some note delays and email-only ticket submissions as limitations.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Checkmarx One needs better accuracy, language support, integration, flexibility, UI customization, documentation, dynamic testing, and API security features.
Sentiment score
4.5
Kiuwan needs to improve integration, user interface, language support, report accuracy, technical support, and vulnerability report generation.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Checkmarx One is favored for its scalability and efficiency, though licensing and resource challenges are sometimes noted.
Sentiment score
6.6
Kiuwan offers robust scalability across environments, supporting various user demands efficiently, though larger analytics may impact budget.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.4
Checkmarx One is costly but valued for its robust security, despite complexity in setup and licensing options.
No sentiment score available
Kiuwan pricing is based on application size, with varying opinions on affordability, offering competitive value in the market.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Checkmarx One is stable for most, but large codebase handling can cause crashes, memory issues, and configuration dependence.
Sentiment score
8.4
Kiuwan is highly stable and reliable, with rare minor issues and strong user satisfaction supported by effective technical support.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Checkmarx One enhances secure coding with user-friendly interface, automation, and multi-language support, making it ideal for developers.
Sentiment score
8.1
Kiuwan integrates with Jenkins and JIRA, offering security scanning, lifecycle management, and user-friendly interface with actionable insights.
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Kiuwan
Ranking in Application Security Tools
19th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.9%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Mustufa Bhavnagarwala - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement
Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
See all answers
What do you like most about Kiuwan?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?
I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kiuwan?
Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One
Compared 49% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 13% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One
Compared 6% of the time
Coverity vs Checkmarx One Logo
Coverity vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
Snyk vs Checkmarx One Logo
Snyk vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan
Compared 54% of the time
Snyk vs Kiuwan Logo
Snyk vs Kiuwan
Compared 11% of the time
Veracode vs Kiuwan Logo
Veracode vs Kiuwan
Compared 10% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan
Compared 6% of the time
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan
Compared 4% of the time
More Kiuwan Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
November 2024
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
Buyer's Guide
Kiuwan
November 2024
Kiuwan reportDownload Kiuwan product report
 

Learn More

Checkmarx
Kiuwan
 

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan
October 2024
Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.