Top 10 Kiuwan Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

23 reviews
93% willing to recommend

168 followers

Top Kiuwan Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kiuwan based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kiuwan Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kiuwan, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube offers extensive language support and integration capabilities, ideal for customization and community involvement. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in rapid scanning and vulnerability analysis, suitable for teams prioritizing security. SonarQube's open-source model is cost-effective, while Kiuwan provides detailed insights for code improvement.

Download Kiuwan vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report

Pricing

SonarQube Server requires significant initial setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more accessible setup with potentially lower expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

SonarQube Server requires significant initial setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more accessible setup with potentially lower expenses.

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

Kiuwan offers attractive pricing and easy deployment with robust code analysis and security features. In comparison, GitLab's higher cost delivers richer capabilities, including CI/CD integration and full DevOps lifecycle management, appealing to teams seeking comprehensive functionality despite more complex deployment.

Download GitLab vs. Kiuwan Report

Pricing

Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.

View comparison

Pricing

Kiuwan requires a substantial setup cost investment, while GitLab offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a clear cost advantage.

Snyk

4.1 out of 5

Snyk

4.1 out of 5

Snyk is a user-friendly security solution that enables users to safely develop and use open source code. Users can create automatic scans that allow them to keep a close eye on their code and prevent bad actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. This enables users to find and remove vulnerabilities soon after they appear.

Download Kiuwan vs. Snyk Report

Pricing

We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon

You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it.

View comparison

Pricing

We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon

You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it.

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One offers extensive integrations and multi-language support. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in vulnerability insights and intuitive configuration, appealing to detailed security needs. Checkmarx One attracts with competitive pricing, while Kiuwan provides value through comprehensive insights despite higher costs.

Download Checkmarx One vs. Kiuwan Report

Pricing

Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Checkmarx One has a high upfront setup cost, while Kiuwan offers a more affordable initial setup. This pricing difference may influence budget-conscious users.

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode, known for robust analytics integration, appeals to those seeking seamless workflow integration. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts users desiring extensive rule customization. Veracode's intuitive deployment aids quick setup, while Kiuwan's cost-effectiveness offers detailed security insights, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers.

Download Kiuwan vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode's setup cost is typically higher yet offers robust enterprise-level features, while Kiuwan presents a more budget-friendly option with costs that align well with small to medium-sized businesses, emphasizing flexibility and ease of initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Mend.io

4.2 out of 5

Kiuwan excels in pricing and customer support, appealing for its thorough code analysis and seamless integration efforts. In comparison, Mend.io's enhanced vulnerability detection and extensive tech support cater to those valuing a versatile solution, justifying its higher cost through robust features and solid ROI.

Download Kiuwan vs. Mend.io Report

Pricing

Kiuwan has a more cost-effective setup cost compared to Mend.io, providing an attractive initial investment. On the other hand, Mend.io offers a higher setup cost, potentially indicating a more comprehensive upfront service or feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortify on Demand

4.0 out of 5

Fortify on Demand

4.0 out of 5

Fortify on Demand excels with broad adaptability and comprehensive analysis, appealing to those needing extensive language support and reliable integration. In comparison, Kiuwan attracts tech buyers prioritizing detailed insights and strong compliance features, despite its complex setup and slower integration.

Download Fortify on Demand vs. Kiuwan Report

Pricing

Fortify on Demand incurs significant setup costs, making it potentially more expensive initially, while Kiuwan offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortify on Demand incurs significant setup costs, making it potentially more expensive initially, while Kiuwan offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan excels in comprehensive vulnerability detection with flexible deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers efficient integration and affordability, making it ideal for diverse programming environments. HCL may suit organizations prioritizing support, while Kiuwan appeals with cost-effective integration capabilities.

Download HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report

Pricing

HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.

View comparison

Pricing

Qualys Web Application Scanning

3.9 out of 5

Qualys Web Application Scanning

3.9 out of 5

Qualys Web Application Scanning is noted for its efficient deployment, favorable pricing, and strong support, making it ideal for vulnerability management and seamless integration needs. In comparison, Kiuwan appeals with a comprehensive feature set for those prioritizing extensive code analysis and security compliance.

Download Kiuwan vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report

Pricing

Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs a setup cost that can be higher, focusing on comprehensive security features, while Kiuwan presents a comparatively lower setup expense, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with moderate initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

GitHub focuses on collaborative development with strong code management and branching strategies, ideal for teamwork. In comparison, Kiuwan excels in code quality and security analysis, making it suitable for detailed risk assessments. GitHub emphasizes cloud deployment, while Kiuwan offers flexible infrastructure options.

Download GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report

Pricing

GitHub's setup cost is user-friendly, focusing on accessibility, while Kiuwan's setup requires a higher investment, reflecting its enterprise-grade features.

View comparison

Pricing

GitHub's setup cost is user-friendly, focusing on accessibility, while Kiuwan's setup requires a higher investment, reflecting its enterprise-grade features.

Related categories

Application Security Tools

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Software Development Analytics