GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #30. GitHub holds a 1.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 98 GitHub reviews

5,656 Views
3,563 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,646 Views
2,143 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,510 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (2nd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	1.6%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	97.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it, and the capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature, as you don't have to write all your code from scratch and can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

More GitHub pros

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"From the tool itself, the developer can run an analysis with the same quality, and with this tool, every developer has the opportunity to do an unlimited analysis."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The storage for this solution could be improved."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"I'd like GitHub to become a more user friendly solution."

"The merging features can be improved."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."

More GitHub cons

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"We faced a lot of problems with the initial setup and support gave us difficulties around the installation."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

University

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

When discussing my use case, I don't know which vendors we are working with in that area, as it's not my area of responsibility right now. About six months ago, I was promoted to Software Developme...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 21% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

April 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

April 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.