GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #30. GitHub holds a 1.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 98 GitHub reviews

5,656 Views
3,563 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,646 Views
2,143 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,468 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (2nd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	1.6%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	97.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has been stable for us."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

"The solution provides good customization and support."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

More GitHub pros

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I advise using Kiuwan because it's very straightforward and totally easy to understand."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"The technical support is very good, and we have received valid answers to our questions."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

"Another problem is installation."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"I am not so tied to Copilot, as I have been using Amp more in recent months."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

More GitHub cons

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

"For mobile development, we are not too experienced, and it is not the perfect tool because the integration with certain products is very manual."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically, but I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports because in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

University

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

When discussing my use case, I don't know which vendors we are working with in that area, as it's not my area of responsibility right now. About six months ago, I was promoted to Software Developme...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 21% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

April 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

April 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.