GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #28. GitHub holds a 1.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,655 Views
2,886 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,214 Views
1,815 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	1.5%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	97.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"The product has a good UI, it's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available, while the two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

"The most valuable feature is the source code management, it's very helpful and it's a great product."

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."

More GitHub pros

"We have had an improvement of 20% in our time to market and it significantly improved the quality of our code."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"The solution will measure your development team, give a KPI for the CISO, reduce the time it takes to find and correct coding errors, and more."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"We've found the way licensing is set up to be very challenging. Also, the LDAP sync capability falls over frequently due to the complexity of our LDAP domains."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

More GitHub cons

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"For mobile development, we are not too experienced, and it is not the perfect tool because the integration with certain products is very manual."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Check with your account manager."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

University

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	50

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

When discussing my use case, I don't know which vendors we are working with in that area, as it's not my area of responsibility right now. About six months ago, I was promoted to Software Developme...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 21% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

March 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

March 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

March 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.