GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #29. GitHub holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,134 Views
2,480 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,016 Views
1,633 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,813 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.3%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	97.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

More GitHub pros

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

More GitHub cons

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

When discussing my use case, I don't know which vendors we are working with in that area, as it's not my area of responsibility right now. About six months ago, I was promoted to Software Developme...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 32% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

February 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

February 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

February 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.