GitHub and Kiuwan are competing products in the software development and security space. GitHub has the upper hand with its collaboration features and community engagement, while Kiuwan is preferred for its strong security capabilities.
Features: GitHub users value collaboration tools, repository management, and integrations with various CI/CD pipelines. Kiuwan users value extensive code security analysis, vulnerability detection, and compliance reporting.
Room for Improvement: GitHub users find the project management functionalities need improvement and some features are complex. Kiuwan users suggest better user experience and faster performance updates.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's cloud-based deployment is simple and quick, with generally positive customer service feedback. Kiuwan's deployment is also cloud-based but more intricate, providing strong support.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub's pricing is flexible and scalable. Kiuwan's pricing is higher but justified by advanced security features, leading to a favorable ROI for security-focused users.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.