GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #34. GitHub holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 102 GitHub reviews

12,463 Views
8,724 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

4,202 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Kiuwan are competitive in the software development and security analytics domain. GitHub strengthens its position with strong community support and extensive DevOps integrations, while Kiuwan's emphasis on security analytics and code quality management gives it an advantage with enterprises focused on security.

Features: GitHub offers robust version control, seamless collaboration features, and integrations with a wide range of third-party tools for enhanced remote work. Kiuwan distinguishes itself with its advanced code quality and security features, producing detailed analytical reports and efficiently integrating into DevOps workflows.

Room for Improvement: Users of GitHub wish for enhanced project management features, better handling of large files, and improved DevOps integration. Meanwhile, Kiuwan could expand its integration capabilities with development frameworks, accelerate rule updates, and develop a more contemporary user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is predominantly deployed in cloud settings, with users valuing its ease of use and community-driven support. Kiuwan is typically used in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments; users are generally satisfied with its technical support but sometimes encounter responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and various pricing models, appealing due to its open-source accessibility. Despite its advantageous pricing, enterprises may find license management cumbersome. Kiuwan is perceived as cost-effective, especially for its leading analytics capabilities, with pricing often based on analyzed lines of code, offering a solid ROI compared to some competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,817 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (2nd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 2.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	2.7%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	96.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Abdulmunafz Mct

Full Stack Developer at Sri Krishna Arts and Science

Daily workflows have become streamlined as I manage projects, learn from clones, and host sites

The thing that has frustrated me is sometimes when I push using a Git command, I need to force the push, which is the main thing. The setup is frustrating because GitHub could add a repository with pre-installed packages or something since I need to install packages in VS Code before pushing and maintain it in the codebase. Git packages need to be installed manually, and if that was already in a GitHub repository, that would be much better. GitHub packages can be installed previously for the project upon the project requirement, and that is the thing I wanted to add here. That would be good. According to governance and security, I recently heard about some security issues in GitHub. I think that could be centralized and should consider those security issues and clear them. The AI capabilities there include Copilot or something else. I recently heard about security issues, but I do not know about it clearly. However, if security has been more tightened, it will be better.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it, and the capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature, as you don't have to write all your code from scratch and can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"GitHub has many features, and it can be very good, such as having repositories, helping clear doubts through community answers and badges, and showcasing my metrics so potential employers can see my commits and activity."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"We are using GitHub for all of our repositories where we can store the code, collaborate with different developers, build, and create a pipeline."

More GitHub pros

"In our digital marketing efforts, our app is in continuous integration and having introduced this tool ensures we are always delivering safe code."

"We have had an improvement of 20% in our time to market and it significantly improved the quality of our code."

"I advise using Kiuwan because it's very straightforward and totally easy to understand."

"We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"This solution helps us to catch issues early on, and find problems that we never knew we had."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"The storage for this solution could be improved."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

More GitHub cons

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I have been using GitHub for free, and recently I got a free education offer, such as educational resources. I believe it is GitHub Pro or something similar. I have been using the educational offer...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

When we were using GitHub, sometimes within a month or two, GitHub is down for some time. Also, it is using SAML authentication, so when we restart our system, if there is an update on our laptop t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

My main use case for GitHub is as a source repository where I'm pushing our code there. Whatever the microservices or the services code we have, we are pushing there. We are running our build and s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 16% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

September 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

September 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a platform that enhances collaboration and version control among developers, utilizing robust integration tools and features suitable for distributed teams. Its capabilities cater to diverse coding and project workflows, supporting effective team contributions and project deployments.

GitHub efficiently manages code repositories, facilitating seamless collaboration in distributed environments. It incorporates features beneficial for continuous integration and continuous deployment with tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Recognized for its code-sharing, security, and branch management capabilities, GitHub serves as a versatile development hub. However, there's room for enhancement in project management, testing, and AI integration, with users expressing a need for better documentation, reporting, and enhanced user experience through improved automation and interface simplification.

What features make GitHub essential?

Version Control: Effective tracking of changes and management of code versions.
Collaborative Environment: Supports team-based collaborative projects across distributed locations.
GitHub Actions: Facilitates automation of workflows and seamless CI/CD integration.
Tool Integrations: Connects with platforms like Jenkins, Azure, Docker, and Jira.
Branch Management: Simplifies code maintenance and deployment processes.

What benefits should users consider?

Improved Team Productivity: Streamlines collaboration and project coordination.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks via GitHub Actions.
Enhanced Security Features: Provides advanced security measures for code safety.
Community Support: Access to extensive developer resources and community aid.
Versatile Usage Scenarios: Adapts to various development and DevOps environments.

GitHub is implemented widely in software development industries, supporting teams that require centralized platforms for code management. It is crucial for maintaining code integrity and facilitating developer communication. Industries rely on it for integrating tools essential for their CI/CD pipelines, accelerating project timelines, and organizing development tasks through collaborative workflows.

GitHub

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.