GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kiuwan is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
2,247 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,546 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Kiuwan compete in code management and software analytics respectively. GitHub has the upper hand in community support and collaboration, while Kiuwan excels in security and detailed analysis.

Features: GitHub offers strong community support for open-source projects, efficient source code management, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. Kiuwan provides fast code scanning, detailed reporting, and thorough security vulnerability analysis.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance project management abilities, improve tool integration, and offer a more intuitive user experience for non-tech users. Kiuwan could improve technical support response times, extend support for additional development frameworks, and reduce false positives in scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub, being cloud-based, offers deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, benefiting from vast community support even with mixed direct customer service reviews. Kiuwan allows for both cloud-based and on-premises deployments, though its security focus may complicate setup. Users find Kiuwan's customer service supportive, often relying on its technical community.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides a free version and diverse licensing options, suitable for various organizational needs, particularly cost-effective for open-source projects, despite some complexity in its licensing model. Kiuwan offers competitive pricing based on code lines, delivering value especially for enterprises focusing on security and quality, both providing substantial ROI by enhancing productivity and reducing time to market.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"The solution can scale."

"We can make a private repository."

"GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and connection."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

More GitHub pros

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"Github needs more storage."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

More GitHub cons

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 51% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

July 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

July 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.