GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,615 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,613 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

GitHub and Kiuwan are competing products in the software development and security space. GitHub has the upper hand with its collaboration features and community engagement, while Kiuwan is preferred for its strong security capabilities.

Features: GitHub users value collaboration tools, repository management, and integrations with various CI/CD pipelines. Kiuwan users value extensive code security analysis, vulnerability detection, and compliance reporting.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users find the project management functionalities need improvement and some features are complex. Kiuwan users suggest better user experience and faster performance updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's cloud-based deployment is simple and quick, with generally positive customer service feedback. Kiuwan's deployment is also cloud-based but more intricate, providing strong support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub's pricing is flexible and scalable. Kiuwan's pricing is higher but justified by advanced security features, leading to a favorable ROI for security-focused users.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Anshul Anshul

Sr. Manager at Wipro Limited

Efficient and accurate scanning, and detailed analysis

In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further. Another issue I've encountered is that Kiuwan only looks at the version of components and doesn't take into account any workaround fixes that have been implemented at the code level. This can result in false positives being reported. Additionally, these issues are in the "insights" tab and not in the code base security aspect. Lastly, when muting findings that are false positives, there should be an option to see the only available at the code level rather than at the organization level because it can lead to missing vulnerabilities if they are muted at the org level. An additional feature that would be helpful is the ability to easily download reports from Kiuwan. Specifically, in the "insights" tab, we have been encountering an error when trying to download the PDF report. We are able to download the code-based security report, but not the insights report. This has been an ongoing issue for the past couple of months and would be beneficial if it could be resolved. My main recommendation would be to address the issues with downloading reports that we have been experiencing. Additionally, it would be helpful if Kiuwan could support a wider range of programming languages, as there are currently some that are not compatible with the tool. If the code of a particular application falls under the category which is not compatible with Kiuwan, then it will not be able to scan it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

"Our code is secure."

More GitHub pros

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"The merging features can be improved."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

More GitHub cons

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Check with your account manager."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 55% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2024

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

December 2024

Download Kiuwan product report

Learn More

GitHub

Kiuwan

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

December 2024

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.