GitHub vs Kiuwan comparison

GitHub and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9, while Kiuwan is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,525 Views
1,124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,477 Views
1,177 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and Kiuwan compete in the software development and code management category. While GitHub leads in code management, collaboration, and ease of use, Kiuwan offers superior capabilities in code quality and security analysis.

Features: GitHub offers a robust version control system, enhances collaboration through an extensive community, and seamlessly integrates with CI/CD tools for effective pipeline management. Kiuwan specializes in enhancing code quality through detailed security vulnerability reporting and provides comprehensive integration capabilities for quick analysis and improved code security.

Room for Improvement: GitHub needs better integration with various tools, improved conflict resolution, and enhanced security features, especially for new libraries. Kiuwan should expand language support, simplify configuration processes, and improve the handling of false positives in code analysis while also modernizing its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers cloud deployment options including public, hybrid, and private clouds and has substantial community support, but its official customer service response is sometimes inconsistent. Kiuwan provides an on-premises deployment option and is praised for its technical support quality, but some users wish for quicker responses.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier and affordable paid plans that are accessible for organizations of all sizes, being perceived as a cost-effective option compared to competitors like Bitbucket. Kiuwan charges on a subscription basis by lines of code scanned, offering competitive pricing with notable ROI as users benefit from streamlined development processes facilitated by both platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is just easy to use."

"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

"The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

More GitHub pros

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."

"Github needs more storage."

"This solution could be improved by offering crowd sourced support where we could ask questions to other users."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

More GitHub cons

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Check with your account manager."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 54% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

February 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

February 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Kiuwan

January 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.