GitLab vs Kiuwan comparison

GitLab and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Kiuwan is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.8. GitLab holds a 3.0% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 82 GitLab reviews

3,648 Views
3,011 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,430 Views
1,094 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitLab

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and GitLab compete in the software market. Kiuwan excels in pricing and customer support, making it a preferred choice for value seekers. GitLab attracts users with its wide range of features, providing long-term benefits.

Features: Kiuwan offers robust code analysis, extensive security checks, and improved software quality. GitLab provides a comprehensive suite of DevOps tools, seamless integration into development pipelines, and versatility for large-scale projects.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Kiuwan could enhance its integration options, improve reporting functionalities, and adapt to modern demands. GitLab users indicate occasional performance lags, the need for simpler configurations, and optimization challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is known for easy deployment and responsive customer service. GitLab, although initially complex, offers comprehensive online resources to aid in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan's pricing is straightforward and cost-effective, promising quick ROI. GitLab has higher initial costs but delivers satisfactory ROI through its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Kiuwan

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 3.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers."

"They incorporate new features every September, and they have introduced their own code editor and AI features."

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."

"When a developer checks in code, it is automatically built and deployed, and automated test cases are also run. We have extensive integration with GitLab, which helps us with source code management. We run the static code analysis using SonarQube."

"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

"The solution is stable."

More GitLab pros

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"There was a problem with the build environment when we were looking at developing iOS applications. iOS build require Mac machines and there are no Mac machines provided by GitLab in their cloud. So to build for mobile iOS application, we needed to use our own Mac machine within our own infrastructure. If GitLab were to provide a feature such that an iOS application could also be built through GitLab directly, that would be great."

"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"The initial setup was quite challenging because it takes some time to understand how to pull out or push the code."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"The pricing has been substantially increased, which is a major concern."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."

"GitLab could add a plugin to integrate with Kubernetes stuff."

More GitLab cons

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"GitLab is cheap."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

26%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 29% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 54% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

March 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

March 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Kiuwan

March 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.