Checkmarx One vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

Checkmarx and MathWorks are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while MathWorks is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.8. Checkmarx holds a 10.7% mindshare in AS, compared to MathWorks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of MathWorks users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

21,297 Views
14,284 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 6 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

1,615 Views
1,024 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Polyspace Code Prover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Polyspace Code Prover deliver robust solutions for software security and verification. Polyspace Code Prover slightly edges out in advanced static code analysis, though Checkmarx One is favored for affordability and support services.

Features: Checkmarx One integrates well and offers comprehensive security scanning, advantageous for DevOps teams. Polyspace Code Prover excels in sophisticated static analysis and proving code correctness without execution while also providing precise identification of coding flaws.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance its scanning speed and the navigation intuitiveness of its tools. Polyspace Code Prover could improve scalability and parallel processing capabilities. Checkmarx needs quicker scanning, contrasting with Polyspace's scalability needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One ensures straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, aiding smoother integration. Polyspace Code Prover demands more setup time, but offers responsive and knowledgeable support. Checkmarx offers seamless initial experiences, while Polyspace requires significant setup effort but maintains high support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is seen as budget-friendly, offering better pricing options for users seeking value. Polyspace Code Prover’s advanced features justify its higher setup costs, delivering long-term cost-effectiveness for thorough code analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.7%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pradeep Panchakarla

Functional Safety Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A reliable solution that provides excellent features and detects memory corruption

The run time analysis process must be improved. If we do not run with the main loop, it generates its own main and doesn’t allow developers to modify the execution sequences. The solution must provide more flexibility to the developers to manipulate the runtime analysis tools. The developer must be allowed to modify the main sequence. It will be very easy for them to test their use cases. Otherwise, Polyspace generates a random main file and executes all the functions randomly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The UI is user-friendly."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

"The outputs are very reliable."

Cons

"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."

"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."

"I can't create a business case with multiple-factor authentication."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"It is an expensive solution."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"We use the paid version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

39%

Computer Software Company

12%

Transportation Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation. It require support. There could be an issue with range propag...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 42% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Coverity vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 30% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 25% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 17% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 2% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

April 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

April 2025

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Polyspace Code Prover report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.