Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

Checkmarx and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Rapid7 is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmarx holds a 11.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

23,218 Views
15,254 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

933 Views
661 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Rapid7 AppSpider are prominent contenders in the application security testing domain. Checkmarx One appears to have the upper hand in terms of support and pricing, while Rapid7 AppSpider's compelling features provide strong advantages.

Features: Checkmarx One delivers comprehensive vulnerability reports, smooth CI/CD integration, and effective pricing structures. Rapid7 AppSpider offers advanced scanning capabilities, extensive technology stack coverage, and detailed scan results, making it an attractive option despite cost considerations.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One would benefit from a simplified learning curve for new users, more extensive documentation, and improved user guidance. Rapid7 AppSpider could improve its reporting capabilities, enhance scan speed, and streamline user interaction experiences to meet user demands better.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One provides cloud-based deployment flexibility and demonstrates a responsive customer support team. Rapid7 AppSpider is noted for straightforward deployment but has received mixed feedback on customer service quality, impacting user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is seen as a cost-effective solution, producing a positive ROI with manageable setup costs and efficient vulnerability management, offering budget-friendly options. Rapid7 AppSpider, while requiring a higher initial investment, justifies its cost with comprehensive feature sets that contribute to long-term security improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 11.5%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Andrei Bigdan

Executive Manager at B2B-Solutions LLC

Useful vulnerability reporting data, flexible, and simple implementation

I have had some stability problems but it could be the Microsoft Windows operating system. I found that closing other applications helps with stability. It is helpful to have as much memory as possible, such as eight gigabytes. The more pages being processed the more resources you need. I rate the stability of Rapid7 AppSpider a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile. If the code has dependencies or build errors, the scan fails. With Checkmarx, pre-compile scanning is seamless. This allows us to scan more code."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."

"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."

"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"The entire solution is interactive and has a point-and-click user experience, which makes it easy to find items or drill down on information. You don't need specialized skills to use the product."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."

"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."

"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."

"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"Integration could be better."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The price is pretty fair."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 AppSpider?

The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor. The price of the s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 46% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 49% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

February 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

February 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

No data available

AppSpider

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.