Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while Rapid7 is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.5. Invicti holds a 3.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 31 Acunetix reviews

4,682 Views
3,745 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 13 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

983 Views
702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Rapid7 AppSpider are competing solutions in the web application security testing category. Rapid7 AppSpider appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features, although Acunetix is more favorable in pricing and support.

Features: Acunetix provides quick scanning, detailed vulnerability reports, and ease of integration. Rapid7 AppSpider offers dynamic scanning capabilities, seamless integration, and advanced vulnerability detection. Users favor Rapid7 AppSpider's features for their depth and effectiveness in identifying threats.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix can improve scan accuracy, enhance reporting formats, and refine user experience. Rapid7 AppSpider users highlight the need for more user-friendly navigation, better false positive handling, and improved customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Rapid7 AppSpider also provides easy deployment but has inconsistent customer service experiences, impacting client support.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has favorable pricing and lower initial setup costs, attracting budget-conscious buyers. Rapid7 AppSpider, despite being costlier, offers strong ROI with its superior features and comprehensive security functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Vulnerability Management (17th), DevSecOps (5th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 3.3%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Andrei Bigdan

Executive Manager at B2B-Solutions LLC

Useful vulnerability reporting data, flexible, and simple implementation

I have had some stability problems but it could be the Microsoft Windows operating system. I found that closing other applications helps with stability. It is helpful to have as much memory as possible, such as eight gigabytes. The more pages being processed the more resources you need. I rate the stability of Rapid7 AppSpider a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"The solution is highly stable."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

More Acunetix pros

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which is compliant with international standards."

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple. The product is stable if configured properly."

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

More Acunetix cons

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."

"Integration could be better."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 AppSpider?

The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor. The price of the s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 44% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

December 2024

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2024

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

AppSpider

Learn More

Invicti

Rapid7

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2024

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.