Checkmarx One vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Checkmarx and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Tenable is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.5. Checkmarx holds a 11.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

24,681 Views
16,235 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 15 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,318 Views
1,805 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are notable web security solutions. Checkmarx One is viewed favorably for its pricing and support, while Tenable.io is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Checkmarx One offers effective vulnerability identification, seamless integration capabilities, and user-friendly navigation. Tenable.io provides extensive scanning options, detailed reporting, and broad compatibility with different platforms.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve reporting functionalities, reduce false positives, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Tenable.io needs to decrease scan times, improve accuracy, and streamline user experience complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One features straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Tenable.io has a robust deployment model but receives mixed reviews on customer service response time.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One's costs are seen as reasonable with a strong return on investment. Tenable.io, although initially more expensive, delivers value over time with its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 11.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"It is a stable product."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"The user interface is modern and nice to use."

"The UI is user-friendly."

"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

"It is fully automated."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"We can run only one project at a time."

More Checkmarx One cons

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is okay."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

We would like some additional features. Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments. Private clouds are becoming more common, and the integration lags with those compared to AWS, Azure, or ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. We deploy it for customers, and it's very easy to deploy. Some people are worried about the cost, but we try to sell it at a good rate, less than the o...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 47% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 32% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 13% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

February 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.