Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Tines comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Tines
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
33rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (20th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (42nd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

KannanPadmanabhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 13, 2023
Used for static comprehension testing and helps us detect vulnerabilities early
We mainly use this solution for static comprehension testing We use it for non-functional insight because it's a security vulnerability scanner. We can use Checkmarx for scanning anytime on our code base. We integrated that as part of our build-a-pipeline, and it helps us detect early. We have…
Del Tice - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 21, 2024
Automate daily tasks, phishing emails, ticket creation and IOC investigations
Support is pretty top-notch. If they identify an issue, they notify their customers. For instance, they monitor the tenants, and if a problem occurs, they send an email to inform you. They provide a lot of their support through Slack channels. Each customer has a dedicated channel where you can post questions or mention issues you’re facing. You’ll usually receive a response quickly. Recently, they’ve integrated AI into this process, so you often get useful suggestions within a minute. If needed, you can also request a human to take a look. Their response time is generally quick, although it might be slower at night since they aren’t available 24/7.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."
"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."
"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."
"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."
"One of the most valuable features is that it’s a low-code solution."
"The best thing is that it's no code, so it doesn't require coding knowledge."
"The tool was vendor-neutral."
 

Cons

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
"Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient."
"Tines was a little bit more expensive than Torq."
"They started implementing some AI, and their AI is isolated."
"Maybe Tines can add more features and demonstrations, like videos on how to use the features within the tool."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."
"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
"The solution is costly."
"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."
"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."
"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What needs improvement with Tines?
Maybe Tines can add more features and demonstrations, like videos on how to use the features within the tool. For example, when you click on a feature, it could show a video link explaining how to ...
What is your primary use case for Tines?
We use it for automations on the enterprise security aspect.
What advice do you have for others considering Tines?
If someone needs tasks performed daily that can be automated between different systems, and if there's a cybersecurity or SOC analyst team, they can also use it by creating various API calls, setti...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tines and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.