Chef vs CircleCI comparison

Progress Software and CircleCI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Progress Software is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while CircleCI is ranked #14 with an average rating of 4.0. Progress Software holds a 0.5% mindshare in BA, compared to CircleCI’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of CircleCI users who would recommend it.

Chef

Read 19 Chef reviews

282 Views
172 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Read 5 CircleCI reviews

1,154 Views
1,041 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Chef

CircleCI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Chef and CircleCI are competing products in the DevOps space, focusing on automation and CI/CD. CircleCI appears to have the upper hand in CI/CD capabilities, while Chef excels in infrastructure management.

Features: Chef provides powerful configuration management to ensure consistent environments, robust automated policy enforcement, and seamless integration with third-party tools. CircleCI delivers easy integration with development tools, automated testing capabilities, and a streamlined CI/CD process.

Room for Improvement: Chef could improve deployment processes and rollback capabilities, enhance user interfaces, and provide more intuitive customization tools. CircleCI might enhance its infrastructure management features, expand native support for more complex use cases, and offer deeper integration options for diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CircleCI facilitates a rapid setup with its cloud-based deployment model and seamless integration with various development platforms, focusing support on enhancing continuous deployment workflows. Chef's deployment demands more extensive customization and initial expertise, with its customer service geared toward effective infrastructure automation support.

Pricing and ROI: Chef involves a higher setup cost due to deeper integration needs and a steeper learning curve, but it brings considerable ROI with advanced infrastructure management. CircleCI’s pricing is optimized for CI/CD, offering a competitive ROI through swift deployment and improved efficiencies, appealing especially to those prioritizing deployment speed and process agility.

To learn more, read our detailed Chef vs. CircleCI Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Chef vs. CircleCI

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Chef

Ranking in Build Automation

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (11th), Configuration Management (18th)

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

14th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Chef is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CircleCI is 3.2%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Aaron P

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy configuration management, optimization abilities, and complete infrastructure and application automation

In terms of improvement, Chef could get better by being more widely available, adapting to different needs, and providing better documentation. There is also an issue with shared resources like cookbooks lacking context, which could lead to problems when multiple companies use them. Chef should aim for wider availability, better flexibility, clearer documentation, and improved management of shared resources to prevent conflicts. Many companies are now moving to Ansible, so I would recommend better documentation, easier customer use, and simpler integration. I have concerns about the complexity of migrating to different servers and would prefer a simpler process.

Read full review

reviewer0972521

Chief Technology Officer at Kyberlife

Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage

We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and environment. That costs us credits. Support engineers do not thoroughly read and understand issues when emailing them. They reply to me with a totally different context about the problem. Just yesterday, my web applications failed to 'yarn build' after I downgraded the resource class from extr-large to large. I contacted support and got no reply. Billing is a mess. There is duplicate information in the bill downloaded from their website and when I asked for a consolidated bill, they just answered that they didn't have it. There is no transparency on how many billed minutes and credits I spent each day both on their website and the monthly bill which makes it difficult to understand when the monthly bill contains many refill item charges. It is difficult or impossible to track usage and burndown of my subscription and to gain total outstanding refill amounts on a daily basis. Their website doesn't provide sufficient information on credits allocated/calculated for my extra-large resource class.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You set it and forget it. You don't have to worry about the reliability or the deviations from any of the other configurations."

"It is a well thought out product which integrates well with what developers and customers are looking for."

"We have had less production issues since using Chef to automate our provisioning."

"The product is useful for automating processes."

"It has been very easy to tie it into our build and deploy automation for production release work, etc. All the Chef pieces more or less run themselves."

"Chef can be scaled as needed. The Chef server itself can scale but it depends on the available resources. You can upgrade specific resources to meet the demand. Similarly, with clients, you can add as many clients as you need. Again, this depends on the server resources. If the server has enough resources, it can handle the number of servers required to manage the infrastructure. Chef can be scaled to meet the needs of the infrastructure being managed."

"It streamlined our deployments and system configurations across the board rather than have us use multiple configurations or tools, basically a one stop shop."

"The solution is easy to use and learn, and it easily automates all the code and infrastructure."

More Chef pros

"It's a stable product."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

Cons

"In the future, Chef could develop a docker container or docker images."

"Since we are heading to IoT, this product should consider anything related to this."

"Support and pricing for Chef could be improved."

"I would like them to add database specific items, configuration items, and migration tools. Not necessarily on the builder side or the actual setup of the system, but more of a migration package for your different database sets, such as MongoDB, your extenders, etc. I want to see how that would function with a transition out to AWS for Aurora services and any of the RDBMS packages."

"If they can improve their software to support Docker containers, it would be for the best."

"The solution could improve in managing role-based access. This would be helpful."

"It is an old technology."

"If only Chef were easier to use and code, it would be used much more widely by the community."

More Chef cons

"Billing is a mess."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Purchasing the solution from AWS Marketplace was a good experience. AWS's pricing is pretty in line with the product's regular pricing. Though instance-wise, AWS is not the cheapest in the market."

"We are using the free, open source version of the software, which we are happy with at this time."

"We are able to save in development time, deployment time, and it makes it easier to manage the environments."

"Chef is priced based on the number of nodes."

"The price per node is a little weird. It doesn't scale along with your organization. If you're truly utilizing Chef to its fullest, then the number of nodes which are being utilized in any particular day might scale or change based on your Auto Scaling groups. How do you keep track of that or audit it? Then, how do you appropriately license it? It's difficult."

"The price is always a problem. It is high. There is room for improvement. I do like purchasing on the AWS Marketplace, but I would like the ability to negotiate and have some flexibility in the pricing on it."

"I wasn't involved in the purchasing, but I am pretty sure that we are happy with the current pricing and licensing since it never comes up."

"When we're rolling out a new server, we're not using the AWS Marketplace AMI, we're using our own AMI, but we are paying them a licensing fee."

More Chef pricing and cost advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

18%

University

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Chef?

Chef is a great tool for an automation person who wants to do configuration management with infrastructure as a code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Chef?

Chef is priced based on the number of nodes.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Chef?

Chef does not support the containerized things of Chef products. In the future, Chef could develop a docker container or docker images.

See all answers

What do you like most about CircleCI?

The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly billing statement is almost unreadable and their online dashboard doesn't provide ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

See all answers

Comparisons

BigFix vs Chef

Compared 28% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Chef

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Chef

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Chef

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Chef

Compared 10% of the time

More Chef Competitors

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 24% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 21% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 16% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 11% of the time

Harness vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Chef

April 2025

Download Chef product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

April 2025

Download CircleCI product report

Overview

Chef, is the leader in DevOps, driving collaboration through code to automate infrastructure, security, compliance and applications. Chef provides a single path to production making it faster and safer to add value to applications and meet the demands of the customer. Deployed broadly in production by the Global 5000 and used by more than half of the Fortune 500, Chef develops 100 percent of its software as open source under the Apache 2.0 license with no restrictions on its use. Chef Enterprise Automation Stack™, a commercial distribution, is developed solely from that open source code and unifies security, compliance, infrastructure and application automation with observability. Chef provides an unequaled developer experience for the Coded Enterprise by enabling users to express infrastructure, security policies and the application lifecycle as code, modernizing development, packaging and delivery of any application to any platform. For more information, visit http://chef.io and follow @chef.

Progress Software

CircleCI is a leading platform for automating continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), valued for its capability to manage software updates efficiently. With an easy-to-configure system using YAML files and robust Docker support, CircleCI streamlines backend updates, frontend developments, and mobile app testing across devices. Its parallelism feature and insightful dashboard reduce processing times and improve workflow visibility, respectively, enhancing team collaboration and productivity while maintaining high-quality outputs across development stages.

CircleCI

Sample Customers

Facebook, Standard Bank, GE Capital, Nordstrom, Optum, Barclays, IGN, General Motors, Scholastic, Riot Games, NCR, Gap

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Chef vs. CircleCI

April 2025

Free Report: Chef vs. CircleCI

Find out what your peers are saying about Chef vs. CircleCI and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Chef vs. CircleCI report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.