Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i comparison

Cisco and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Cisco is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Cisco holds a 28.1% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Cisco DNA Center
Read 41 Cisco DNA Center reviews
  • 6,795 Views
  • 3,997 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Read 23 OpenText Network Node Manager i reviews
  • 457 Views
  • 249 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

OpenText Network Node Manager i and Cisco DNA Center are network management competitors. Cisco DNA Center is perceived as superior due to its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: OpenText Network Node Manager i is known for robust monitoring, extensive automation tools, and detailed network visualization. Cisco DNA Center shines with its AI-driven analytics, intuitive dashboard, and seamless integration with Cisco hardware.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Network Node Manager i could enhance its multi-vendor support, improve root cause analysis capabilities, and expand reporting options. Cisco DNA Center may benefit from simplifying its learning curve, refining its AI features for broader applications, and enhancing documentation to support new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a straightforward deployment model with responsive customer service. Cisco DNA Center has more documentation and a knowledgeable support team, although its comprehensive feature set presents a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Network Node Manager i is more budget-friendly with lower initial setup cost and stable performance, providing good ROI. Cisco DNA Center requires a higher initial investment but aims for significant long-term ROI through reduced operational costs and improved network efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco DNA Center
Ranking in Network Management Applications
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (15th), Network Automation (2nd)
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of Cisco DNA Center is 28.1%, up from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Node Manager i is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

AvrahamSonenthal - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently manages our wireless network and provides valuable monitoring features
The platform's biggest benefit has been in managing our wireless network. Having a single pane of glass to control all wireless controllers and access points and to monitor activity has been a significant advantage. We're a small federal agency with around 300 network devices, so automation is a minor focus. It's more relevant for larger networks. The main benefits we've seen are in inventory management and the potential for configuration automation. However, I recommend using the DNA Centre only for larger networks with over a thousand devices; otherwise, it may not be cost-effective. Before proceeding, ensure that your devices are compatible with DNA Center, as not all Cisco devices are supported. Also, investing in proper training is different from plug-and-play. I rate it an eight.
Read full review
Mirit Goldring-Boymshtain - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-implement product with a valuable map topology feature
The platform has a lot of interesting capabilities. Implementation is simplified, in contrast to some products like SolarWinds, where external assistance is often required for meet uploads. It is more inexpensive than other products in the market. In a specific customer implementation, the complex topology of the customer's network revealed a separate and closed segment at one of their sites. We could not understand the status of the broken network and devices. With the help of NNMi, we got a view of the issues. The product helps us reduce downtime and improve incident response time by offering remediation options. The tools run automatically, checking the network activities for different areas and time zones. It provides efficient documentation, interface, and integration features. I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of Cisco DNA Center are wireless assurance and visibility."
"The solution helps in user microsegmentation."
"Has a good processing feature with a high level of accuracy."
"I like the visibility, instant build, network, policies, and the ability to control access. I also like that you can visualize your whole network."
"The best feature of Cisco DNA Center is the visibility page, where you can see everything on the dashboard, and you don't have to be a technical person to view the issues."
"The monitoring is very valuable to me."
"Cisco VXLAN is a protocol that has been around for some time, but the practical implementation and operational capability of Cisco DNA Center bring it to life."
"I like that we can easily configure any new hardware. It's also easy to deploy and easy to troubleshoot."
More Cisco DNA Center pros
"A good enterprise-level solution."
"The platform has good stability."
"Most valuable function would have to the internal causal engine and its root cause analyzer which keep us updated on critical errors and incidents in our network environment."
"Real time network monitoring application: It is very stable, which provides quick root cause analysis (RCA) for any network faults."
"If you install one node on Network Node Manager and want to scale it up, it's pretty easy to create more nodes."
"You can utilize the main file from various vendors for integration."
"The best feature is the solution's entire credibility with all vendors."
"It is a scalable product."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i pros
 

Cons

"There should be an option for automation of template deployment by using the stored data. It is not easy to save configuration information for lots of devices without using other tools. There should be a tighter, better repository of information that can be merged with the templates."
"When it comes to deploying wireless fields, integrating defaults into the DNS interface can be challenging."
"The solution's technical support is an area with which my company's clients have a problem. Cisco doesn't provide good technical support unless a user has a big account that Cisco wants to retain."
"What could be improved is the licensing cost of Cisco DNA Center. It's a little bit expensive."
"They can improve the network visibility. Licensing and its maintenance are also needed."
"An area that needs improvement is the integration with other vendors."
"The solution’s security side could be improved."
"We encountered issues with their response times, which had a big impact on our workflow."
More Cisco DNA Center cons
"The deployment architecture and installation part needs improvement."
"The dashboards are not customizable and it's not user-friendly."
"Only to improve the GUI."
"When I open a ticket, usually they respond very late. Some of the people I negotiate with seem undertrained."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not the best when it comes to drilling down for more visibility, especially regarding traffic."
"They should add AI options in the product's next release."
"We had some issues with some of the features, some modules are not meeting expectations."
"The way the solution currently works means I'm not able to customize my own reports."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's a very expensive tool."
"The solution is a little bit expensive but depends a lot on the customer's usage. If you use it in the right place, you can easily pay for it."
"I rate the product's pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."
"The partnership price is notably high, but it ultimately depends on the chosen business model."
"The licensing cost for Cisco DNA Center is not more than that of other solutions."
"We have a three-year license with them."
"The product is very costly."
"It is an expensive solution."
More Cisco DNA Center pricing and cost advice
"The solution is priced mid-range compared to the competition."
"It is more inexpensive than other products in the market."
"I wasn't involved in the pricing, but I think it's quite expensive."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It's an expensive solution."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco DNA Center?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it gives some kind of ease in operations, especially since our company is moving from CLI to GUI-based configuration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco DNA Center?
The cost is very high.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco DNA Center?
The system is working fine for me currently.
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
The platform has good stability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
They should add AI options in the product's next release.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
We use the product monitoring network infrastructure, interfaces, and devices.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco DNA Center Logo
Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco DNA Center
Compared 8% of the time
Meraki Dashboard vs Cisco DNA Center Logo
Meraki Dashboard vs Cisco DNA Center
Compared 7% of the time
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs Cisco DNA Center Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs Cisco DNA Center
Compared 7% of the time
Cisco Catalyst Center vs Cisco DNA Center Logo
Cisco Catalyst Center vs Cisco DNA Center
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiManager vs Cisco DNA Center Logo
Fortinet FortiManager vs Cisco DNA Center
Compared 6% of the time
More Cisco DNA Center Competitors
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 28% of the time
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 24% of the time
Fortinet FortiManager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
Fortinet FortiManager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 18% of the time
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 13% of the time
More OpenText Network Node Manager i Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco DNA Center
February 2025
Cisco DNA Center reportDownload Cisco DNA Center product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Network Node Manager i
February 2025
OpenText Network Node Manager i reportDownload OpenText Network Node Manager i product report
 

Also Known As

DNA Center
Micro Focus Network Node Manager, Network Node Manager, HPE Network Node Manager
 

Overview

Cisco DNA Center offers a comprehensive platform for network automation and management, providing detailed analytics, enhanced security, and streamlined operations for both wired and wireless networks.

Cisco DNA Center integrates with Cisco infrastructure to deliver efficient network automation and management, helping organizations improve network visibility, security, and control. It supports AI-driven analytics and automated workflows to enhance operational efficiency and reduce errors. Challenges include compatibility with third-party systems, steep learning curve, and complex deployment. Its interface facilitates centralized control, vital for troubleshooting, policy management, and configuration management, with support for zero-touch provisioning and SD-Access.

What are the key features of Cisco DNA Center?
  • Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights into network health with AI-driven analytics.
  • Centralized Security: Integrates with ISE for comprehensive security management.
  • Automated Device Management: Simplifies device provisioning and configuration transfers.
  • Wi-Fi Analytics: Offers deep insights into wireless network performance.
  • Zero-Touch Provisioning: Streamlines new device deployments with minimal human intervention.
  • Scalable Segmentation: Efficiently segments network traffic ensuring security and performance.
What benefits should users consider?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces potential errors and streamlines workflow.
  • Enhanced Security: Integration with Cisco ISE bolsters security capabilities.
  • Network Visibility: Comprehensive dashboards and analysis tools enhance monitoring.
  • Troubleshooting: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying and resolving issues swiftly.

In sectors such as healthcare, finance, and retail, Cisco DNA Center is utilized for its ability to enhance security and compliance, manage large-scale networks, and provide detailed analytics for better operational decision-making. Its support for location tracking and policy automation ensures efficient network management across diverse environments.

Cisco
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) delivers powerful capabilities enabling NOCs to manage modern networks. NNMi Smart Plug-ins expand NNMi into specialized environments, helping your team reduce time to resolve issues. NNMi is a core component of Network Operations Management.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IPC, Exelon, VivaCom, 
Buyer's Guide
Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
January 2025
Free Report: Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco DNA Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.