Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Node Manager i comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IBM Tivoli NetCool
Read 13 IBM Tivoli NetCool reviews
  • 773 Views
  • 226 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Read 23 OpenText Network Node Manager i reviews
  • 530 Views
  • 282 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli NetCool and OpenText Network Node Manager i based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool
Ranking in Network Management Applications
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Node Manager i is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications
 

Q&A Highlights

DK
Dec 23, 2014
Which Network Management System is better, IBM Netcool or HP Node Manager?
We had Netcool for a few years and we droped it in favor of CA Spectrum. Overall deployment of Netcool was considered a failure. Even What's Up Gold was better as a transition solution to CA. Unfortunately I cannot recommend Spectrum either because it's a hardware resources hog and it performs slow. Also the cost of Spectrum is per network interface polled and Support costs a fortune.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

Petar Ganev - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed
There are problems with the latest security requirements because many things have changed in recent years, and now the security audits are very strict. And we need to switch to something else. We need to patch it constantly. Moreover, it is a very old tool and a little bit difficult to support. Otherwise, they work okay.
Read full review
Mirit Goldring-Boymshtain - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-implement product with a valuable map topology feature
The platform has a lot of interesting capabilities. Implementation is simplified, in contrast to some products like SolarWinds, where external assistance is often required for meet uploads. It is more inexpensive than other products in the market. In a specific customer implementation, the complex topology of the customer's network revealed a separate and closed segment at one of their sites. We could not understand the status of the broken network and devices. With the help of NNMi, we got a view of the issues. The product helps us reduce downtime and improve incident response time by offering remediation options. The tools run automatically, checking the network activities for different areas and time zones. It provides efficient documentation, interface, and integration features. I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool is much easier to manage than running scripts and figuring out how many endpoints have been exceeded."
"NetCool has a huge database that can collect and process about one million alarms a day."
"It's very easy to use."
"Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system."
"The scalability of monitoring, the breadth of supported network components, the scale of the number of monitoring events, and the flexibility in customization make this a well-rounded product."
"The feature I have found most valuable with NetCool is how it collaborates all the alarms, and then it does a predictive analysis, providing a consolidated alarm view and management."
"Tivoli NetCool allows us to grasp a lot of data that can be applied toward predictive analytics and auto-remediation."
"Support is one of the best aspects of this solution. NetCool is a good product that has good flexibility. There are a lot of documents available online which is one of the best features of IBM Tivoli Suite. Whenever an issue happens, rather than going to technical support, if you find the exact issue in Google, you can get tech notes for that particular issue."
More IBM Tivoli NetCool pros
"You can utilize the main file from various vendors for integration."
"Most valuable function would have to the internal causal engine and its root cause analyzer which keep us updated on critical errors and incidents in our network environment."
"The platform has good stability."
"Our monitoring and network teams of less than 100 people use this solution. The availability and fault monitoring are good."
"It is stable for fault and availability."
"It's quite a mature solution."
"It gives us a good overview of what's happening in our networks and the devices in the networks."
"Topology creation is the most valuable feature."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i pros
 

Cons

"UI is outdated, very old legacy."
"The solution is too expensive."
"Tivoli NetCool is based on a Linux platform, it would be beneficial if they moved it to Windows because not everyone is acquainted with Linux."
"The solution does not have any AI capabilities."
"Tivoli NetCool's has medium scalability - there are some problems with its replications not being mature."
"Customization and integration that you need to do to make the product fit your needs is very complex. It is not a product that somebody could easily pick up without any prior training or experience."
"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to see more AIOps, Artificial Intelligent Operations in the next release. IBM develops new features for Power BI or Cognos Analytics, which is good. As of now, we use Cognos Analytics, we are not using Power BI. They have the Insight concept but we don't like that."
More IBM Tivoli NetCool cons
"They should add AI options in the product's next release."
"When I open a ticket, usually they respond very late. Some of the people I negotiate with seem undertrained."
"As the technologies evolve, also these solutions or the monitoring tools should evolve to cover the progress in technology, including capabilities related to monitoring of virtualized devices today, as the DNS is on the table in this way."
"The solution should integrate with NAC servers."
"Reporting. Even though this is available in separate software (iSPI) there is potential in making the reporting more SLA-aware and more intuitive."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not the best when it comes to drilling down for more visibility, especially regarding traffic."
"The deployment architecture and installation part needs improvement."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not powered to drill down for traffic visibility."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"It costs around 100k for every ten servers, which is lower than similar products from other vendors."
"Customers are required to pay a licensing fee."
"The price of the product is too expensive."
"The solution is priced mid-range compared to the competition."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It is more inexpensive than other products in the market."
"I wasn't involved in the pricing, but I think it's quite expensive."
"It's an expensive solution."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

DK
Dec 23, 2014
Dec 23, 2014
Which Network Management System is better, IBM Netcool or HP Node Manager?
We had Netcool for a few years and we droped it in favor of CA Spectrum. Overall deployment of Netcool was considered a failure. Even What's Up Gold was better as a transition solution to CA. Unfortunately I cannot recommend Spectrum either because it's a hardware resources hog and it performs slow. Also the cost of Spectrum is per network interface polled and Support costs a fortune.
2 out of 7 answers
it_user167895 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2014
If you have not heared from SevOne and have been in contact with them. Please do, It will save you a lot of money and you will be the champ forever. You can compare it as riding a bike (you have to paddle) versus a solar driven car that works If you do so, send me a credit for buying a cake. That will do for me :) THX, Ronald Jansen
Read full answer
it_user76911 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2014
Based on my experience I would suggest you for Entuity - EYE which got perfect features required for a Network monitoring tool requirement. Feature like In-Depth Real time monitoring, Flows, Network Maps, Inventory Management, Event Management, easy to integrate.
Read full answer
See all 7 answers
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the funct...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool?
The tool had many built-in automation capabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool?
The main challenge is its licensing model, which is very complicated.
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
The platform has good stability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
They should add AI options in the product's next release.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
We use the product monitoring network infrastructure, interfaces, and devices.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 49% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 19% of the time
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 18% of the time
More IBM Tivoli NetCool Competitors
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 42% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 27% of the time
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 20% of the time
More OpenText Network Node Manager i Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli NetCool
November 2024
IBM Tivoli NetCool reportDownload IBM Tivoli NetCool product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Network Node Manager i
November 2024
OpenText Network Node Manager i reportDownload OpenText Network Node Manager i product report
 

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool
Micro Focus Network Node Manager, Network Node Manager, HPE Network Node Manager
 

Learn More

IBM
Video not available
OpenText
 

Overview

IBM Tivoli Netcool delivers near real-time, consolidated event management across business infrastructure, data centers, complex networks and IT domains. The software provides full management and automation to help you deliver continuous uptime of business services and applications.
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) delivers powerful capabilities enabling NOCs to manage modern networks. NNMi Smart Plug-ins expand NNMi into specialized environments, helping your team reduce time to resolve issues. NNMi is a core component of Network Operations Management.
 

Sample Customers

Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)
IPC, Exelon, VivaCom, 
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
October 2024
Free Report: IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.