Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.9% mindshare in NMA, compared to IBM’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.
HPE Intelligent Management ...
Read 7 HPE Intelligent Management Center reviews
  • 1,233 Views
  • 879 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
IBM Tivoli NetCool
Read 13 IBM Tivoli NetCool reviews
  • 647 Views
  • 183 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool and HPE Intelligent Management Center are competitive products in network management and monitoring. IBM Tivoli NetCool appears to have an advantage in terms of flexibility and customization options, but HPE Intelligent Management Center shows strength in integration capabilities, making it a comprehensive solution for organizations seeking robust performance monitoring.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool provides advanced event management and correlation features, allowing for detailed monitoring and real-time problem detection. Its adaptability for complex IT environments stands out. HPE Intelligent Management Center offers a unified platform with extensive network management capabilities and ease of integration with various network devices to enhance operational efficiency. The primary difference lies in IBM's focus on event management, while HPE emphasizes comprehensive network oversight.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool could enhance user interface intuitiveness, streamline integration with emerging technologies, and improve deployment processes. HPE Intelligent Management Center might benefit from expanding cross-vendor equipment support, increasing scalability for larger networks, and reducing setup complexities in multi-vendor environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli NetCool's deployment requires a tailored approach depending on the IT ecosystem, supported by strong technical customer service. HPE Intelligent Management Center benefits from a more straightforward and scalable deployment process that aligns well with diverse infrastructures while offering accessible customer support. The main distinction is IBM's need for personalized deployments versus HPE's streamlined approach.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool involves a higher setup cost due to its customizability, providing significant ROI for businesses needing detailed network insights. Conversely, HPE Intelligent Management Center offers a more cost-effective setup with a rapid return on investment, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget-friendly solutions. The difference highlights IBM's higher initial investment for extensive features against HPE's affordability and quick ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Intelligent Management ...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
8th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Tivoli NetCool
Ranking in Network Management Applications
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of HPE Intelligent Management Center is 5.9%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad_Faisal - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve seamless network and link monitoring with comprehensive device management
The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them. The really beneficial feature is the link monitoring. I had checked Check Point's product, however, my requirements are better fulfilled by IMC. The main feature is that IMC automatically configures the device for my use. I have over 200 features in my network, and IMC manages the complete environment. Automation is good, but I mainly use it for monitoring. I am too satisfied with this product.
Read full review
Petar Ganev - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed
There are problems with the latest security requirements because many things have changed in recent years, and now the security audits are very strict. And we need to switch to something else. We need to patch it constantly. Moreover, it is a very old tool and a little bit difficult to support. Otherwise, they work okay.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."
"The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use."
"The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them."
"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers."
"It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality."
"The feature I have found most valuable with NetCool is how it collaborates all the alarms, and then it does a predictive analysis, providing a consolidated alarm view and management."
"The tool is much easier to manage than running scripts and figuring out how many endpoints have been exceeded."
"The solution has very good integration capabilities."
"It's very easy to use."
"Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system."
"Tivoli NetCool allows us to grasp a lot of data that can be applied toward predictive analytics and auto-remediation."
"The tool had many built-in automation capabilities."
"The scalability of monitoring, the breadth of supported network components, the scale of the number of monitoring events, and the flexibility in customization make this a well-rounded product."
More IBM Tivoli NetCool pros
 

Cons

"I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall."
"One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."
"I would like to see additional modules included."
"HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow."
"The integration with other network devices needs improvement."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to see more AIOps, Artificial Intelligent Operations in the next release. IBM develops new features for Power BI or Cognos Analytics, which is good. As of now, we use Cognos Analytics, we are not using Power BI. They have the Insight concept but we don't like that."
"Customization and integration that you need to do to make the product fit your needs is very complex. It is not a product that somebody could easily pick up without any prior training or experience."
"Tivoli NetCool is based on a Linux platform, it would be beneficial if they moved it to Windows because not everyone is acquainted with Linux."
"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."
"UI is outdated, very old legacy."
"The solution is too expensive."
"Tivoli NetCool's has medium scalability - there are some problems with its replications not being mature."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
More IBM Tivoli NetCool cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is not at all cheap, but it's reasonable compared to SolarWinds."
"There are licensing costs and they are quite expensive."
"It costs around 100k for every ten servers, which is lower than similar products from other vendors."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"Customers are required to pay a licensing fee."
"The price of the product is too expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
14%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Intelligent Management Center?
One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE Intelligent Management Center?
I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall. This will be sorted out with the help of IMC, and now I have a modem dialing as per my needs.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HPE Intelligent Management Center?
I am using this solution for network monitoring, links monitoring, and complete monitoring of my infrastructure. I also deploy FortiVAF, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager as part of a complete securi...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the funct...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool?
The tool had many built-in automation capabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool?
The main challenge is its licensing model, which is very complicated.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 43% of the time
Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 29% of the time
Huawei eSight vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Huawei eSight vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 8% of the time
ExtremeCloud IQ vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
ExtremeCloud IQ vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 7% of the time
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 7% of the time
More HPE Intelligent Management Center Competitors
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 42% of the time
OpenText Network Node Manager i vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
OpenText Network Node Manager i vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 20% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool
Compared 17% of the time
More IBM Tivoli NetCool Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
April 2025
HPE Intelligent Management Center reportDownload HPE Intelligent Management Center product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli NetCool
April 2025
IBM Tivoli NetCool reportDownload IBM Tivoli NetCool product report
 

Also Known As

HPE IMC
Tivoli NetCool
 

Overview

HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

  • Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
  • Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services
  • Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.
  • Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
  • Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
  • Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
IBM Tivoli Netcool delivers near real-time, consolidated event management across business infrastructure, data centers, complex networks and IT domains. The software provides full management and automation to help you deliver continuous uptime of business services and applications.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)
Buyer's Guide
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool
April 2025
Free Report: HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.