Cisco and D-Link Ethernet Switches compete in the networking equipment category. Cisco seems to have the upper hand with robust features and enterprise-level versatility, while D-Link offers a more cost-effective solution with ease of use for smaller networks.
Features: Cisco Ethernet Switches are known for their power-saving design, CDP for efficient management, and robust security features like MACSec layer-2 encryption. They also support advanced QoS for prioritization and offer features like StackPower to enhance power availability. D-Link Switches are favored for their cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and straightforward configuration. They include features like plug-and-play capabilities and green technology for energy efficiency.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Switches could improve in user interface design, ease of configuration, and overall affordability. Their complex licensing and initial setup can be barriers for users. D-Link Switches would benefit from enhanced security features, scalability for larger networks, and reducing costs associated with their L2 models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco offers numerous deployment options such as hybrid cloud and on-premises but may require more technical expertise to set up. Their technical support is strong, albeit sometimes slow. D-Link focuses on straightforward on-premises deployment, with generally positive customer service and minimal technical support needed, making it ideal for less technical users.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco's pricing is on the higher end, reflecting its reliability and extensive feature set, possibly affecting ROI due to initial and ongoing costs. D-Link provides a cost-effective alternative, especially for small to medium businesses, with competitive pricing and no recurring license fees, contributing to a solid ROI without compromising essential functionalities.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.