Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] comparison

"This product is widely available and the warranty is very good."

"The layer-2 switching is very fast."

"In terms of most valuable feature, I would say the user interface."

"Cisco switches have several valuable features like VLAN mapping. We seldom use that, but we find the security configurations helpful, like high availability with trading port channels and MAC filtering."

"Remote access is a valuable feature."

"Tech support has always been good."

"I know this solution for many years. I know the GUI and commands, and they are useful for me. I have all the functions that I want."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the performance of the product."

"Enterasys Ethernet Switches are stable."

"This is a big telco switch with six slots."

"Cisco has a lot of propriety protocols compared to other products, such as Arista Networks."

"In the case of an already existing network, we encounter technical issues related to following protocols."

"The solution should offer a method for user-based load balancing."

"The price could be improved by being reduced."

"The high price of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There is a need for improvement on the ordering and delivery side for Cisco Ethernet switches."

"The solution's reliability should be improved."

"The initial setup for on-prem versions is complex and requires a trained, certified engineer."

"Enterasys could provide better support, needs an improved user interface and improved performance."

"The initial setup could be made simpler."

"Its price is very high, but it is a good device. Cisco must work on its price. Other solutions provide a better price for similar functionalities."

"Price is a pain point for us. We've lost a lot of bids, and the reason has been that we majorly quoted Cisco devices. Some of our competitors quoted other devices like Ubiquity or Microchip. Some even quoted this Chinese product TP-Link, and they won the bid over us because we quoted Cisco. Meanwhile, the major reason why we quoted Cisco is reliability and stability from day one. They also last longer. The prices could be worked on so that they become more affordable. We had to deploy a city-wide WiFi network, and we were working in conjunction with Google. Because of the price, even Google recommended a product called Ruckus, so we used Ruckus over Cisco. Its price and license were the main reasons. You have to pay to renew the license every year. Even though you also renew the licenses for Ruckus, but they are much cheaper than Cisco. So, while I would recommend Cisco any time, the trouble remains with the pricing."

"Cisco now has more products that are priced for small businesses, so they do have some cheaper models."

"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be better."

"The pricing is reasonable so I rate it a six out of ten."

"Its price is a bit higher than other brands. Indian customers are price-conscious. They should improve its price."

"Customers have to pay for some of the L3 switches licenses, which are expensive."

"The solution has different prices depending on the features that you want to have."

"These switches are very expensive compared to those from other vendors."