Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and ThreatLocker Protect are competing products in the network security category. ThreatLocker Protect seems to have the upper hand due to its straightforward application control and pricing model, making it appealing for businesses seeking user-friendly solutions.
Features: Cisco Identity Services Engine offers comprehensive network access control, posture assessment, and profiling, providing valuable RADIUS support and TrustSec secure segmentation, ideal for large enterprise environments. On the other hand, ThreatLocker Protect offers robust application control capabilities, including allowlisting, ring-fencing, selective elevation, and applications control focusing on Zero Trust principles. Its effective training and support enhance its value proposition.
Room for Improvement: Cisco ISE users report challenges with complexity and initial setup, noting a steep learning curve, particularly in integrated deployment with third-party products. Enhanced documentation and user-friendly interfaces are important areas for improvement. Meanwhile, ThreatLocker Protect could benefit from user interface simplification and clearer notification systems, along with increased transparency in ticket handling and PSA system integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Identity Services Engine is mostly deployed in on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, supported strongly through Cisco's partner program despite its deployment complexity. ThreatLocker Protect offers more flexible deployment options across on-premises, private, and cloud environments. It receives praise for ease of integration and positive feedback for customer service and technical support regarding responsiveness and helpfulness.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco ISE comes with a complex and often costly licensing model, though users consider it worthwhile for the security and efficiencies it provides at enterprise levels. ThreatLocker Protect is noted for its relatively reasonable and transparent pricing model, offering scalability suited to business needs and acknowledging the ROI in efficiencies and improved security operations, while more pronounced than direct financial returns.
I rate the technical support as one out of ten.
It could be better, especially with response times.
They are very poor in asset classification and should focus on improving the preauthentication profiling, especially for NAC use cases.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Factors like architecture, business nature, and legal limitations such as GDPR affect it.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
Making large organizational costs significant.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
The stability of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is poor for certain use cases, like authentication.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is very good at device administration.
Cisco ISE is an all-in-one solution that streamlines security policy management and reduces operating costs. Cisco ISE delivers visibility and access control over users and devices across wired, wireless, and VPN connections.
Identity Services Engine enables enterprises to deliver secure network access to users and devices. It shares contextual data, such as threats and vulnerabilities, with integrated solutions from Cisco technology partners. You can see what is happening in your network, which applications are running, and more.
Features of Cisco ISE
Benefits of Cisco ISE
Cisco’s holistic approach to network access security has several advantages:
Support
You can get ISE as a physical or virtual appliance. Both deployments can create ISE clusters that create scale, redundancy, and requirements.
Licensing
Cisco ISE has four primary licences. Evaluation for up to 100 endpoints with full platform functionality. The higher tiers are Partner, Advantage and Essential.
Reviews from Real Users
"The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system. according to a PeerSpot user in Cyber Security at a manufacturing company.
Omar Z., Network & Security Engineer at an engineering company, feels that "The RADIUS Server holds the most value."
“Whether I deploy in China, the US, South Africa, or wherever, I can get all the capabilities. It allows me to directly integrate with 365, and from a communications point of view, that is a good capability," says Rammohan M., Senior Consultant at a tech services company.
Hassan A.,Technology Manager at Advanced Integrated Systems, says that "The most valuable feature is the integration with StealthWatch and DNA as one fabric."
ThreatLocker Protect offers zero-trust security, application whitelisting, and software control across endpoints. It blocks unauthorized software, manages application installations, and prevents malicious activity for enhanced cybersecurity.
ThreatLocker Protect enhances security by blocking unauthorized software and managing application installation across endpoints. Admins receive alerts for attempts to run unapproved applications, ensuring secure environments. Utilized by MSPs, MSSPs, and IT service providers, ThreatLocker Protect integrates into security stacks to improve access control and inventory management. While the solution provides remote management through a mobile app and offers comprehensive training and support, it requires improvements in training flexibility, policy update performance, the reporting system, and custom rule management for software developers.
What are the most important features?ThreatLocker Protect is commonly implemented across industries like healthcare, finance, education, and retail to maintain strict access controls, manage application installations, and ensure endpoint security. In healthcare, it prevents unauthorized software from compromising patient data. Financial institutions use ThreatLocker Protect to guard against unauthorized transactions and data breaches. Educational institutions rely on it to manage software access for staff and students, while retail businesses use it to secure point-of-sale systems and inventory management.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.