Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Intersight vs Nutanix Prism comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Users quickly achieved ROI with IBM Turbonomic by optimizing resources, reducing costs, and improving performance and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.7
Nutanix Prism enhances efficiency and cost savings by reducing manpower and maintenance needs, achieving rapid ROI within two years.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.8
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Intersight's customer service is accessible 24/7 and professional but inconsistent in complex issue resolution without specific contracts.
Sentiment score
8.5
Users praise Nutanix Prism's effective customer service, valuing knowledgeable support and proactive issue resolution despite minor improvement areas.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco Intersight is highly rated for scalability, enabling seamless scaling without maintenance; some organizations plan to increase usage.
Sentiment score
7.9
Nutanix Prism is highly scalable, easy to expand, often without downtime, though some cite capacity-related limitations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Intersight is mostly stable, but upgrades may cause issues; some versions are preferred for their reliability.
Sentiment score
8.5
Nutanix Prism is reliable and stable, handling heavy workloads with minimal issues and high user ratings despite minor initial bugs.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
Cisco Intersight users seek improved integration, hybrid cloud support, hyperscale capabilities, automation, and better usability for diverse infrastructures.
Nutanix Prism needs a more intuitive interface, better automation, improved integration, and enhanced support for user-friendliness and compatibility.
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
Cisco Intersight provides cost-effective, straightforward licensing with generally positive user feedback, requiring purchase for enhanced control features.
Nutanix Prism offers competitive pricing with robust features and ease of use, though higher than some alternatives.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
Cisco Intersight enhances manageability with seamless integrations, workflow automation, data visibility, and hybrid environment management via a centralized portal.
Nutanix Prism provides centralized management with an intuitive interface, offering upgrades, integration, automation, security, and scalability features.
Intersight offers a simple monitor feature, which can be integrated with other Cisco products, while still providing a solution with another brand.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (5th)
Cisco Intersight
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th)
Nutanix Prism
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Management Tools (2nd), Data Center Infrastructure Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Cloud Management
Virtualization Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
David Fartouk - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps know whether a solution is deployed correctly, but the automation capabilities are difficult to use
We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy the solution. It didn't give us much value. It wasn't that good. Intersight is a pretty complex solution. It can give you a lot of things, but nothing is simple. The usability must be better.
Arpan Rakshit - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduced our administration and rack space significantly, with everything in one box
Nutanix is a great product, but I won't say it is a data center product. If it could leverage or work with non-Nutanix infrastructure, it would be a total data center solution. Right now, with Prism Central, we can only manage Nutanix clusters. If we were able to manage the whole data center from the single pane of glass, it would be more helpful. I think that would help all customers. Also, Nutanix Flow for microsegmentation is limited right now to AHV clusters, meaning only Nutanix clusters. If it could integrate with all my infrastructure, I would have a pane of glass where I could manage my whole data center, including microsegmentation. They really need to extend its features beyond the Nutanix infrastructure. That is the one thing I would really like to see improvement on.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
41%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Computer Software Company
26%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?
Intersight can validate our environment.
What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware. There is also a need to inc...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?
The most common use case was the HyperFlex deployment in the past. However, with HyperFlex being discontinued, I now ...
What do you like most about Nutanix Prism?
Nutanix Prism offers web scaling, which facilitates easy scaling.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Prism?
The pricing is reasonable, approximately $400 to $500 per core.
What needs improvement with Nutanix Prism?
There is a need for more migration tools, especially for migrating a solution from non-Nutanix environments to a Nuta...
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
Intersight
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
EXMAR, RapidScale
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.