Cisco Meeting Server vs Pexip comparison

Cisco and Pexip are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Pexip is ranked #20. Cisco holds a 9.3% mindshare in VM, compared to Pexip’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cisco Meeting Server

Read 5 Cisco Meeting Server reviews

903 Views
714 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Pexip

Read 1 Pexip review

392 Views
233 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Cisco Meeting Server

Pexip

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Meeting Server and Pexip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meeting Server

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pexip

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

20th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco Meeting Server is 9.3%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pexip is 2.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Elrayes

Voice Network Engineer at Raya Integration

A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings

I use Cisco Meeting Server for conferences and video meetings, which are crucial for my company The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server. In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required. In the…

Read full review

reviewer1438284

Account Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features

The solution is too big, too vast to really wrap your head around everything. There are too many directions it can go in. There aren't too many negatives. It's been an overall positive experience. Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have. This would dictate the license capacity you need to buy. The product could offer better backgrounds, or the ability to change the background.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UI is user-friendly and very good overall."

"The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server."

"What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration."

"You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff."

"Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution."

"The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."

Cons

"Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session."

"In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions."

"This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier."

"A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app."

"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are billed yearly."

"Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category."

"Cisco Meeting Server has reasonable licensing costs."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Retailer

13%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Meeting Server?

Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meeting Server?

Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Meeting Server?

Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Webex vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 45% of the time

Zoom vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei Video Conferencing Platform vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 7% of the time

Skype for Business vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 6% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco Meeting Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Meeting Server Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

October 2024

Download Cisco Meeting Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

October 2024

Download Pexip product report

Also Known As

Acano

No data available

Learn More

Cisco

Pexip

Overview

Cisco Meeting Server brings premises-based video, audio, and web communication together to meet the collaboration needs of the modern workplace. It works with third-party devices, and provides an enjoyable and intuitive user experience. It also scales easily, and can be purchased using our all-in-one, user-based multiparty licensing offer.

Pexip simplifies video communication across borders, businesses and platforms.

High-quality video meetings
Reliable, high-performing video experience for both you and your guests. Every time.

Total interoperability
Connect all your video conferencing technology with a single solution. Support tools like Microsoft Teams, Google Hangouts Meet, or Skype for Business in the same workflow as meeting room systems and mobile, desktop, or web users.

Flexible deployments
A cloud-native platform provided as a service or deployed as a self-hosted solution either on-premises or in any cloud environment.

Sample Customers

Starz

PayPal, Nordea, Vodafone, Spotify, Intel

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.